This article reflects upon an international collaboration between supervision experts from South Africa, Hong Kong and New Zealand with the Singapore Association of Social Workers. This collaboration was focused on developing the supervision of supervisory practice. An overview of social work supervision in Singapore is discussed, followed by the process of developing the programme content, delivering training and providing consultation on creating a curriculum. The outcomes include supervision guidelines, curriculum development and further cross-national collaborations. The article concludes by discussing the learning from this international collaboration.
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) (2009) ANZASW Supervision Policy. Wellington, New Zealand: ANZASW.
2.
Australian Association of Social Workers (2014) Supervision Standards. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Association of Social Workers. Available at: www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/6027 (accessed 11 February 2023).
3.
BarrM (2019) Singapore: A Modern History. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
4.
BeddoeLKarvinen-NiinikoskiSRuchG, et al. (2015) Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. The British Journal of Social Work46(6): 1568–1586.
5.
BoltonKBothaW (2017) English as a medium of instruction in Singapore higher education. In: Fenton SmithBHumphreysPWalkinshawI (eds) English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia Pacific: From Policy to Pedagogy. Cham: Springer, pp. 133–152.
6.
BordersLD (2022) Extending conversations: Expanding and enhancing our understanding of clinical supervision – across disciplines and countries. The Clinical Supervisor41(1): 1–5.
7.
BradleyGEngelbrechtLKHöjerS (2010) Supervision: A force for change? Three stories told. International Social Work53: 773–790.
8.
British Association of Social Workers (2011) BASW/CoSW England research on supervision in social work, with particular reference to supervision practice in multi-disciplinary teams. British Association of Social Workers. Available at: https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_13955-1_0.pdf
9.
EllisMVDouceLA (1994) Group supervision of novice clinical supervisors: Eight recurring issues. Journal of Counseling & Development72(5): 520–525.
10.
EngelbrechtLK (2019) Towards authentic supervision of social workers in South Africa. The Clinical Supervisor38(2): 301–325.
11.
EngelbrechtLK (2021) Supervision of social workers within a social development paradigm: A South African perspective. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 51–63.
12.
EngelbrechtLKSpolanderGMartinL, et al. (2016) Reflections on a process model for international research collaboration in social work. International Social Work59(4): 438–451.
13.
FalenderCGoodyearRDuanC, et al. (2021) Lens on international clinical supervision: Lessons learned from a cross-national comparison of supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy51(3): 181–189.
14.
Gómez-PoyatoMJAguilar-LatorreAMartínez-PecharrománMM, et al. (2020) Flipped classroom and role-playing as active learning methods in the social work degree: Randomized experimental study. Social Work Education39(7): 879–892.
15.
HinesAMCohenETranTD, et al. (2010) The development of social work in Vietnam: The role of international collaboration. Social Work Education29(8): 910–922.
16.
KhosaPEngelbrechtLK (2021) Developing professional supervision policies, standards and practices. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 592–606.
17.
LongCM (2020) Welcome Address by Ms Long Chey May, President of Singapore Association of Social Workers at the Awards Presentation Ceremony for Outstanding Social Worker Award and Promising Social Worker Award 2020. Singapore: Singapore Association of Social Workers.
National Research Council (2001) Preparing for an Aging World. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
20.
NgAKTTsuiMSLeungC (2021) Social work supervision in Hong Kong. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 75–89.
21.
NgKT (2016) Exploring the professional supervisory dyad working alliance in children and family integrated services in Hong Kong. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. Available at: https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/bitstream/200/8727/1/b29254760.pdf (accessed 11 February 2023).
22.
O’DonoghueK (2010) Towards the construction of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand: A study of the perspectives of social work practitioners and supervisors. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10179/1535 (accessed 14 August 2024).
23.
O’DonoghueK (2019a) Registered social workers who are supervisors: A national survey. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work31(3): 97–115.
24.
O’DonoghueK (2019b) The supervision of registered social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand: A national survey. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work31(3): 58–77.
25.
O’DonoghueK (2019c) Supervision of supervision – training the trainers workshop in Singapore, workbook (Unpublished manuscript), Massey University, New Zealand.
26.
O’DonoghueK (2021) The evolution of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 101–111.
27.
O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (2021) Introduction: Supervision in social work. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. xx–xxvi.
28.
O’DonoghueKTsuiMS (2015) Social work supervision research (1970–2010): The way we were and the way ahead. The British Journal of Social Work45(2): 616–633.
29.
O’DonoghueKWongYJPTsuiMS (2018) Constructing an evidence-informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work21(3): 348–358.
30.
OrnellasAEngelbrechtLK (2021) Effective supervision and organizational culture. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 560–570.
31.
OwR (1999) Social work in a multicultural context. International Social Work42(1): 7–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/002087289904200102 (accessed 11 February 2023).
32.
OwR (2014) Social work in Singapore. In: AspalterC (ed.) Social Work in East Asia. London: Routledge, pp. 123–138.
33.
PattersonF (2019) Supervising the supervisors: What support do first-line supervisors need to be more effective in their supervisory role?Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work31(3): 46–57.
34.
SengBKSubramaniamMChungYJ, et al. (2021) Resilience and stress in frontline social workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Asian Social Work and Policy Review15: 234–243.
35.
SewpaulVHenricksonM (2019) The (r)evolution and decolonization of social work ethics: The global social work statement of ethical principles. International Social Work62(6): 1469–1481.
36.
SewpaulVJonesD (2004) Global standards for social work education and training. Social Work Education23(5): 493–513.
37.
ShulmanL (2006) The clinical supervisor-practitioner working alliance. The Clinical Supervisor24(1–2): 23–47.
38.
ShulmanL (2010) Interactional Supervision (3rd edn). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers Press.
39.
ShulmanL (2021) Interactional supervision: Shifting the guiding paradigm. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 443–451.
SinghGHawkinsLWhymarkG (2007) An integrated model of collaborative knowledge building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects3: 85–105.
Social Work Accreditation and Advisory Board (SWAAB) (2021b) Social work supervision: Riding the waves and rethinking social work supervision. In: Proceedings from the Social Work Supervision Seminar: Riding the Wave, Singapore, 8–9July.
StahlG (2000) A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In: FishmanBO’Connor-DivelbissS (eds) Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 70–77. Available at: http://websites.umich.edu/~icls/proceedings/pdf/Stahl.pdf (accessed 11 February 2023).
49.
TruellR (2020) The next global agenda, creating a vision we can all get behind. International Social Work63(1): 113–115.
50.
TsuiMSO’DonoghueKNgKT (2014) Cultural competent and diversity-sensitive clinical supervision. In: WatkinsCEJrMilneDL (eds) The Wiley International Handbook of Clinical Supervision. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 239–254.
51.
WongJELLeoYSTanCC (2020) COVID-19 in Singapore – Current experience: Critical global issues that require attention and action. JAMA323(13): 1243–1244.
52.
WongPYJ (2021) Social work supervision in Singapore: Historical development and the way forward. In: O’DonoghueKEngelbrechtLK (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge, pp. 64–74.
53.
WongPYJWongKLGhohC, et al. (2022) Supervision of supervisory practice: From idea to practice. International Social Work66(6): 1918–1931.
