Objective: This study focused on interrelationships among supervisor attachment, supervisory working alliance, and supervision-related affect, plus the moderating effect of a field instructor training. Method: The researchers employed a pretest–posttest follow-up design of 100 randomly assigned field instructors and 64 students in two universities, using linear growth models to estimate relations among variables concurrently and over time. Result: Positive associations existed between attachment anxiety and negative affect among field instructors and between positive affect and supervisory alliance for all participants. Results suggested the training might have allowed field instructors to separate initial impressions of the alliance from change in positive affect over the year. Conclusion: This study underscores the need for research on field instructor training models and attachment styles in supervision.
AinsworthM. D. S. (1985). Attachments across the life span. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61, 792–812.
2.
AinsworthM.BleharM.WatersE.WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AllenJ. (2012). Commentary on “Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry”: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Psychiatry: Biological and interpersonal processes, 75, 32–39.
4.
BennettS.DealK. H. (2010). Implications of attachment theory for social work education. In BennettS.NelsonJ. (Eds.). Adult attachment in clinical social work: Practice, research, and policy (pp. 253–265). New York: Springer Publishing.
5.
BennettS.DealK. (2012). Supervision training: What we know and what we need to know. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82(2-3), 195–215.
6.
BennettS.MohrJ.BrintzenhofeSzocK.SaksL. (2008). General and supervision-specific attachment styles: Relations to student perceptions of social work field supervisors. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(2), 75–94.
7.
BennettS.SaksL. (2006). A conceptual application of attachment theory and research to the social work student-field instructor supervisory relationship. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(3), 157–169.
8.
BordinE. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42.
9.
BorelliJ. (2006). The importance of emotion regulation in understanding attachment and intersubjectivity: A comment on Lyons-Ruth. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26, 622–630.
10.
BowlbyJ. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2, Separation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
12.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
BowlingN. A.HendricksE. A.WagnerS. H. (2008). Positive and negative affectivity and facet satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business & Psychology, 23, 115–125.
14.
CozzarelliC.HoekstraS.BylsmaW. (2000). General versus specific mental models of attachment: Are they associated with different outcomes?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 605–618.
15.
CrawfordJ. R.HenryJ. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties, and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265.
16.
DealK.BennettS.MohrJ.HwangJ. (2011). Effects of field instructor training on student competencies and the supervisory alliance. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(6), 712–726.
17.
DicksonJ. M.MoberlyN. J.MarshallY.ReillyJ. (2011). Attachment style and its relation to working alliance in the supervision of British clinical psychology trainees. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 322–330.
18.
EllisonM. I. (1994). Critical field instructor behaviors: Student and field instructor views. Arete, 18, 12–20.
19.
FitchJ. C.PistoleM. C.GunnJ. E. (2010). The bonds of development: An attachment-caregiving model of supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 29, 20–34.
20.
FortuneA. E.AbramsonJ. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11, 95–110.
21.
FortuneA. E.McCarthyM.AbramsonJ. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111–124.
GentzlerA.KernsK. (2006). Adult attachment and memory of emotional reactions to negative and positive events. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 20–42.
24.
GriffinD.BartholomewK. (1994). Models of the self and other: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.
25.
HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233.
26.
KadushinA. (1992). What’s wrong, what’s right with social work supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 10, 3–19.
27.
KurdekL. A. (2002). On being insecure about the assessment of attachment styles. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 19, 811–834.
28.
KnightC. (1996). A study of MSW and BSW students’ perceptions of their field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 399–414.
29.
KnightC. (2000). Engaging the student in the field instructor relationship: BSW and MSW students’ views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20, 173–201.
30.
KnightC. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students’ views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379.
31.
KooleS.RothermundK. (2011). ‘I feel better but I don’t know why’: The psychology of implicit emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 389–399.
32.
LopezF. G.MauricioA. M.GormleyB.SimkoT.BurgerE. (2001). Adult attachment orientations and college student distress: The mediating role of problem coping styles. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 459–464.
33.
Lyons-RuthK. (2006). The interface between attachment and intersubjectivity: Perspective from the longitudinal study of disorganized attachment. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26, 595–616.
34.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
MikulincerM.ShaverP.PeregD. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation & Emotion, 6, 77–102.
36.
NagelkerkeN.FidlerV.BersenM.BorgorffM. (2000). Estimating treatment effects in randomized clinical trials in the presence of non-compliance. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1849–1864.
37.
Neswald-McCalipR. (1995). Development of the secure counselor: Case examples supporting Pistole & Watkins’s (1995) discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 18–27.
38.
PeughJ. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112.
39.
PierceT.LydonJ. (2001). Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 613–631.
40.
PistoleC.WatkinsE. (1995). Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 457–478.
41.
Renfro-MichelE.SheperisC. J. (2009). The relationship between counseling supervisee attachment orientation and perceived bond with supervisor. Clinical Supervisor, 28, 141–154.
42.
RiggsS. A.BretzK. M. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 558–566.
43.
SafranJ.MuranC. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44.
SchoreJ. R.SchoreA. N. (2008) Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 9–20.
45.
SiegelD. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
SladeA. (2008). The implications of attachment theory and research for adult psychotherapy: Research and clinical perspectives. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 762–782). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
48.
TargetM. (2006). The interface between attachment and intersubjectivity: Another contribution from Karlyn Lyons-Ruth. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26, 617–621.
49.
TraceyT. J.KokotovicA. M. (1989). Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1, 207–210.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
52.
WhiteV. E.QueenerJ. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42, 203–218.
