This descriptive, cross-sectional study administered a questionnaire to 616 Syrian refuges, evaluating the participants’ sociodemographic characteristics and their views on the processes associated with social acceptance and cultural and social accommodation. The problems encountered among Syrian refuges after migration included expensive housing costs, language problems, difficulties making a living and education problems. Various problems were identified among subgroups, associated with working life and cultural differences. However, according to this study, Syrian refugees believed that the processes of social acceptance and the social accommodation of refugees by local populations had begun.
Alvarez-HernandezL.R.ChoiY.J. (2017) ‘Reconceptualizing Culture in Social Work Practice and Education: A Dialectic and Uniqueness Awareness Approach’, Journal of Social Work Education53(3): 384–98.
4.
Atasü-TopcuoğluR. (2019) ‘Syrian Refugee Entrepreneurship in Turkey: Integration and the Use of Immigrant Capital in the Informal Economy’, Social Inclusion7(4): 200–10.
5.
BalážR.ČemováL. (2020) ‘The Mainstreaming of Integration Governance and Social Work in the Local Integration of Immigrants’, Czech & Slovak Social Work/Sociální práce/Sociálna práca19(1): 94–109.
6.
BiçerN. (2017) ‘The Views of Syrian Refugees Migrating to Turkey on the Turkish Language and Culture: Kilis Case’, Journal of Education and Training Studies5(3): 97–109.
ÇetinM. (2019) ‘Effects of Religious Participation on Social Inclusion and Existential Well-Being Levels of Muslim Refugees and Immigrants in Turkey’, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion29(2): 64–76.
9.
CifciE.G.GökerM.KardesT.Y. (2016) ‘Perceptions of Social Support and Future Expectations among Young Adult Syrian Immigrants’, Journal of Sociology4(2): 92–7.
10.
DemirO.Ö. (2015) Göç Politikaları, Toplumsal Kaygılar ve Suriyeli Mülteciler. Ankara: Global Politika ve Strateji Yayını (in Turkish).
11.
DimitrovaD.V.Ozdora-AksakE.Connolly-AhernC. (2018) ‘On the Border of the Syrian Refugee Crisis: Views from Two Different Cultural Perspectives’, American Behavioral Scientist62(4): 532–46.
12.
ErcoskunB. (2015) ‘Suriyeli mültecilerin Türkiye’ye sosyokültürel ve sosyoekonomik etkileri’, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University, Istanbul (in Turkish).
13.
ErdoganM.M. (2014) ‘Türkiye’deki Suriyeliler: toplumsal kabul ve uyum araştırması’, Göç ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Merkezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara (in Turkish). Available online at: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/46184 (accessed 10 March 2019).
14.
GencD.ÖzdemirkıranM. (2015) ‘Local Perceptions on Syrian Migration to Turkey: A Case Study of Istanbul Neighborhoods’, in 3rd Turkish Migration Conference (eds SekerG.TilbeA.OkmenM., et al.), Prague, 25–27 June, pp. 24–7. Frankfurt: Central and Eastern European Online Library.
15.
Higher Education Information Management System (2016–2017) ‘Universities with the Most Syrian Students’. Available online at: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ (accessed 10 March 2019).
16.
KarkınV.YazıcıO. (2015) ‘Syrian Arab Spring Reflection and Turkey Refuge Refugees (Gaziantep Sample)’, Education and Society in the 21st Century4(12): 201–13.
KayaM. (2015) ‘A Visit to the Neighbour: Living in Turkey from the Perspective of Refugee Associations Established by Syrian Refugees’, The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies39: 263–79.
19.
KocaB.T. (2016) ‘Syrian Refugees in Turkey: From “Guests” to “Enemies”?’, New Perspectives on Turkey54: 55–75.
20.
Koser AkcaparS.SimsekD. (2018) ‘The Politics of Syrian Refugees in Turkey: A Question of Inclusion and Exclusion through Citizenship’, Social Inclusion6(1): 176–87.
21.
LiC.JiangS. (2018) ‘Social Exclusion, Sense of School Belonging and Mental Health of Migrant Children in China: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis’, Children and Youth Services Review89: 6–12.
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Interior Directorate General of Migration Management (2019) ‘Number of Syrians in Turkey’. Available online at: https://multeciler.org.tr/turkiyedeki-suriyeli-sayisi/ (accessed 3 March 2019).
24.
RunesuE. (2016) ‘An Overview of Military Social Work: The Case of Zimbabwe’, African Journal of Social Work6(1): 14–21.
25.
SamD.L. (2006) ‘Acculturation: Conceptual Background and Core Components’, in SamD.L.BerryJ.W. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology, 2nd edn, pp. 11–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SeidelF.A.JamesS. (2019) ‘Unaccompanied Refugee Minors in Sweden: Challenges in Residential Care and the Role of Professional Social Work’, Residential Treatment for Children & Youth36(2): 83–101.
27.
SezginA.A.YolcuT. (2016) ‘Social Cohesion and Social Acceptance Process of Incoming International Students’, Humanitas4(7): 417–36.
28.
ŞimşekD. (2018) ‘Transnational Activities of Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Hindering or Supporting Integration’, International Migration57(2): 268–82.
29.
SmeekesA.VerkuytenM.CelebiE.AcartürkC.OnkunS. (2017) ‘Social Identity Continuity and Mental Health among Syrian Refugees in Turkey’, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology52(10): 1317–24.
30.
TarmanB.GürelD. (2017) ‘Awareness of Social Studies Teacher Candidates on Refugees in Turkey’, The Journal of Social Studies Research41(3): 183–93.
31.
TuncA.Ş. (2015) ‘Refugee Behaviour and Its Social Effects: An Assessment of Syrians in Turkey’, Turkish Journal of TESAM Academy2(2): 29–63.
YazıcıogluY.ErdoganS. (2004) SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık (in Turkish).
34.
YıldırımalpS.İslamogluE.İyemC. (2017) ‘Suriyeli sığınmacıların toplumsal kabul ve uyum sürecine ilişkin bir araştırma’, Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi2: 107–26 (in Turkish).
35.
YıldızA.UzgörenE. (2016) ‘Limits to Temporary Protection: Non-Camp Syrian Refugees in Izmir, Turkey’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies16(2): 195–211.
