The approval of the 2014 joint Global Definition of Social Work required that international social work associations review the associated ethical principles of social work. The Global Social Work Statement of Ethical Principles (GSWSEP) was approved by international social work bodies in Dublin in July 2018. While the previous Statement of Ethics emphasized liberal humanist values common in the European–North American axis, the GSWSEP recognizes the global nature of the social work profession and locates human dignity at the core of social work ethics. The GSWSEP problematizes the core principles of social work, and responds to calls to decolonize social work in the context of the increasing regulation of social work.
AddamsJ. (1902) Democracy and Social Ethics. London: Macmillan.
2.
AlthusserL. (1971) ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’, in AlthuserL. (ed.) Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, pp. 127–88. London: New Left Books.
3.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2011) ‘Generating Research Questions through Problematization’, Academy of Management Review36: 247–71.
4.
BacchiC. (2012) ‘Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible’, Open Journal of Political Science2(1): 1–8.
5.
BanksS. (1998) ‘Professional Ethics in Social Work – What Future?’, British Journal of Social Work28: 213–31.
6.
BanksS. (2001) Ethics and Values in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
BaumanZ.TesterK. (2001) Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Oxford: Polity Press.
9.
BeauchampT.ChildressJ. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
BismanC. (2004) ‘Social Work Values: The Moral Core of the Profession’, British Journal of Social Work34(1): 109–23.
11.
BourdieuP. (1996) The State and Nobility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
ColeP. (2017) ‘An Indigenous Research Narrative: Ethics and Protocols Over Time and Space’, Qualitative Inquiry23(5): 343–51.
13.
CongressE.P.LynnM. (1997) ‘Social Group Work in the Community: Navigating the Slippery Slope of Ethical Dilemmas’, Social Work With Groups20(3): 61–74.
14.
De VriesR.RottL. (2011) ‘Bioethics as Missionary Work: The Export of Western Ethics to Developing Countries’, in MyserC. (ed.) Bioethics around the Globe, pp. 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Department of Social Development & South African Council for Social Service Professions (2012) Supervision Framework for the Social Work Profession. Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
16.
DoelM. (2016) Rights and Wrongs in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
DruggeA.L. (2016) ‘How Can We Do It Right? Ethical Uncertainty in Swedish Sami Research’, Journal of Academic Ethics14(4): 263–79.
18.
EjazF.K. (1991) ‘Self-Determination: Lessons to be Learned from Social Work Practice in India’, British Journal of Social Work21(2): 127–42.
19.
EnglebrechtL. (2013) ‘Social Work Supervision Policies and Frameworks: Playing Notes or Making Music?’, Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk49(4): 456–68.
20.
FederE.K. (2014) Making Sense of Intersex: Changing Ethical Perspectives in Biomedicine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
21.
FranklinD.L. (1986) ‘Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice’, Social Service Review60(4): 504–21.
22.
General Social Care Council (GSCC) (2002) Codes of Practice for Social Care Workers and Their Employers. London: GSCC.
23.
GoddenN.J. (2017) ‘The Love Ethic: A Radical Theory for Social Work Practice’, Australian Social Work70(4): 405–16.
24.
GoneJ.P. (2017) ‘“It Felt Like Violence”: Indigenous Knowledge Traditions and the Postcolonial Ethics of Academic Inquiry and Community Engagement’, American Journal of Community Psychology 60(3–4): 353–60.
25.
HealyL. (2001) International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
HealyL.KamyaH. (2014) ‘Ethics and International Discourse in Social Work: The Case of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Legislation’, Ethics and Social Welfare8(2): 151–9.
27.
HenricksonM.FouchéC. (2017) Vulnerability and Marginality in Human Services. Surrey: Routledge.
28.
HugmanR.BowlesW. (2012) ‘Social Work Values, Ethics and Professional Regulation’, in LyonsK.HokenstadT.PawarM.HueglerN.HallN. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of International Social Work, pp. 150–62. London: SAGE.
LetsekaM. (2014) ‘Ubuntu and Justice as Fairness’, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences5(9): 544–51.
34.
LevinasE. (1985) Ethics and Infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
35.
MetzT. (2014) ‘Harmonizing Global Ethics in the Future: A Proposal to Add South and East to West’, Journal of Global Ethics10(2): 146–55.
36.
MillerS.C. (2017) ‘Reconsidering Dignity Relationally’, Ethics and Social Welfare11(2): 108–21.
37.
Morton NinomiyaM.E.PollockN.J. (2017) ‘Reconciling Community-Based Indigenous Research and Academic Practices: Knowing Principles is Not Always Enough’, Social Science & Medicine172: 28–36.
38.
NobleC.HenricksonM. (2014) ‘Towards Identifying a Philosophical Basis for Social Work’, in NobleC.StraussH.LittlechildB. (eds) Global Social Work: Crossing Borders, Blurring Boundaries, pp. 3–14. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
39.
OpokuR. (2016) Gendered Violence: Patterns and Causes of Women-to-Women Violence in the Lake Zone Regions of Tanzania, East Africa (Social Work). Tampere: University of Tampere.
40.
PolmanL. (2010) The Crisis Caravan: What’s Wrong with Humanitarian Aid?New York: Henry Holt.
41.
ReamerF.G. (1995) Social Work Values and Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
42.
ReamerF.G.NimmagaddaJ. (2017) ‘Social Work Ethics in India: A Call for the Development of Indigenized Ethical Standards’, International Social Work60(1): 182–95.
43.
SenA. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
SewpaulV. (2010) ‘Professionalism, Postmodern Ethics and Global Standards for Social Work Education and Training’, Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk46(3): 253–62.
45.
SewpaulV. (2013) ‘Inscribed in Our Blood: Confronting and Challenging the Ideology of Sexism and Racism’, Affilia28(2): 116–25.
46.
SewpaulV. (2015) ‘Politics with Soul: Social Work and the Legacy of Nelson Mandela’, International Social Work59(6): 697–708.
47.
SewpaulV. (2016) ‘The West and the Rest Divide: Culture, Human Rights and Social Work’, Journal of Human Rights and Social Work1: 30–39.
48.
SewpaulV.HölscherD. (2004) Social Work in Times of Neoliberalism: A Postmodern Discourse. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
49.
SinhaP. (2017) ‘Listening Ethically to Indigenous Children: Experiences from India’, International Journal of Inclusive Education21(3): 272–85.
50.
South African Council for Social Service Professions (2007) Policy Guidelines for Course of Conduct, Code of Ethics and the Rules for Social Workers. Pretoria: South African Council of Social Service Professions.
51.
WateneK. (2016) ‘Valuing Nature: Māori Philosophy and the Capability Approach’, Oxford Development Studies44(3): 287–96.
52.
WebbS.A. (2006) Social Work in a Risk Society: Social and Political Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
