The experiences of diverse people present challenges and opportunities for knowledge production. The knowledge base undergirding social work has been found to be dominated by Anglo-American cultural values assumed to be universally applicable. The relevant texts on social work knowledge were examined. The analysis revealed that culture is the cornerstone of any society’s response to social problems, that the hegemony of Eurocentric paradigms remain intact, that there is complicity with the coloniality of power in knowledge production resulting in epistemic injustice, and that decolonisation and indigenisation are critical imperatives towards the achievement of global cognitive justice. A contrapuntal epistemology of social work is recommended.
AlatasS.F. (2006) Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi: SAGE.
2.
AsanteM.K. (2006) ‘A Discourse on Black Studies: Liberating the Study of African People in the Western Academy’, Journal of Black Studies36(5): 646–62.
3.
AskelandG.A.PayneM. (2006) ‘Social Work Education’s Cultural Hegemony’, International Social Work49(6): 731–43.
4.
AtalY. (1981) ‘The Call for Indigenisation’, International Social Science Journal33(1): 189–97.
5.
Bar-OnA.A. (1998) ‘Social Work in “Rainbow” Nations: Observations of a Troubled Relationship’, Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk34(2): 150–62.
6.
BoroujerdiM. (2002) ‘Subduing Globalization: “The Challenge of the Indigenization Movement”’, in GrantR.ShortJ.R. (eds) Globalisation and the Margins, pp. 39–49. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BrydonK. (2011) ‘Promoting Diversity or Confirming Hegemony? In Search of New Insights for Social Work’, International Social Work55(2): 155–67.
8.
CoatesJ. (2003) Ecology and Social Work: Towards a New Paradigm. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Press.
9.
ConnellR. (2011) Confronting Equality: Gender, Knowledge and Global Change. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
10.
ConnellR. (2014) Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application, Planning Theory13(2): 210–223.
11.
CossomJ. (1990) ‘Increasing Relevance and Authentication in Social Work Curricula by Writing and Teaching from Indigenous Cases’, paper presented at the 25th International Congress of the International Association of Schools of Social Work, Lima, Peru, 15–20 August 1990.
12.
GrahamM. (2007) ‘Knowledge Representation in Social Work Education: Inclusion of Marginalised Perspectives’, International Journal of Humanities3(10): 9–14.
13.
GrahamM.J. (1999) ‘The African-centered Worldview: Toward a Paradigm for Social Work’, Journal of Black Studies29(2): 252–67.
14.
GrayM. (2005) ‘Dilemmas of International Social Work: Paradoxical Processes in Indigenization, Imperialism and Universalism’, International Journal of Social Welfare14(2): 230–7.
15.
GrayM. (2010) ‘Indigenization in a Globalizing World: A Response to Yunong and Xiong (2008)’, International Social Work53(1): 115–127.
16.
GrayM.AllegrittiI. (2002) ‘Cross-cultural Practice and the Indigenization of African Social Work’, Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk33(4): 324–35.
17.
GrayM.FookJ. (2004) ‘The Quest for a Universal Social Work: Some Issues and Implications’, Social Work Education23(5): 625–44.
18.
GrayM.CoatesJ.Yellow-BirdM. (eds) (2008) Indigenous Social Work around the World: Towards Culturally Relevant Education and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
19.
GrayM.CoatesJ.Yellow-BirdM. (2014) ‘The Enduring Relevance of Indigenization in African Social Work: A Critical Reflection on ASWEA’s legacy’, Ethics and Social Welfare8(2): 101–16.
20.
HaugE. (2005) ‘Critical Reflections on the Emerging Discourse of International Social Work’, International Social Work48(2): 126–35.
21.
HealyL. (2001) International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World. New York: Oxford University Press.
IfeJ. (2000) ‘Local and Global Practice: Relocating Social Work as a Human Rights Profession in the New Global Order’, European Journal of Social Work4(1): 5–15.
24.
KjellgrenB. (2003) ‘The Predicament of Indigenization: Constructions and Methodological Consequences of Otherness in Chinese Ethnography’, Taiwan Journal of Anthropology1(1): 147–78.
25.
LaenuiP.
(B.Hayden)
(2007) ‘Welcome Remarks’, paper presented at the Indigenous Voices in Social Work: Not Lost in Translation conference, Oahu, HI, 5 June 2007.
26.
LeeM.GreeneG. (1999) ‘A Social Constructivist Framework for Integrating Cross-cultural Issues in Teaching Clinical Social Work’, Journal of Social Work Education35(1): 21–37.
27.
LorenzW. (2008) ‘Paradigms and Politics: Understanding Methods Paradigms in an Historical Context’, British Journal of Social Work28: 625–44.
28.
Maldonado-TorresN. (2007) ‘On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept’, Cultural Studies21(2–3): 240–70.
29.
MangalisoM. (2001) ‘Building Competitive Advantage from Ubuntu: Management Lessons from South Africa’ Academy of Management Perspective15(3): 23–33.
30.
MidgleyJ. (1981) Professional Imperialism: Social Work in the Third World. London: Heinemann.
31.
MidgleyJ. (2001) ‘The Critical Perspective in Social Development’, Social Development Issues23(1): 42–50.
32.
MidgleyJ. (2008) ‘Promoting Reciprocal International Social Work Exchanges: Professional Imperialism Revisited’, in GrayM.CoatesJ.Yellow BirdM. (eds) Indigenous Social Work around the World: Towards Culturally Relevant Education and Practice, pp. 31–45. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
33.
MupendziswaR. (1992) ‘Africa at the Crossroads: Major Challenges for Social Work Education and Practice Towards the Year 2000’, Journal of Social Development in Africa7(2): 19–38.
34.
NimnagaddaJ.BalgopalP.R. (2000) ‘Indigenisation of Social Work Knowledge: An Exploration of the Process’, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work10(2): 4–18.
35.
Osei-HwedieK. (1993) ‘The Challenge of Social Work in Africa: Starting the Indigenisation Process’, Journal of Social Development in Africa8(1): 19–30.
36.
PellebonD.A. (2007) ‘An Analysis of Afrocentricity as Theory for Social Work Practice’, Advances in Social Work8(1): 169–83.
37.
QuijanoA. (2000) ‘Colonialidad del Poder y Clasificación Social’, Journal of World-Systems Research6(2): 342–86.
38.
RankopoM.Osei-HwedieK. (2011) ‘Globalization and Culturally Relevant Social Work: African Perspectives on Indigenization’, International Social Work54(1): 137–47.
39.
Reyes CruzM. (2008) ‘What If I Just Cite Graciela? Working toward Decolonizing Knowledge through a Critical Ethnography’, Qualitative Inquiry14(4): 651–8.
40.
SantosB.D.S. (2014) Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
41.
SchieleJ. (1997) ‘The Contour and Meaning of Afrocentric Social Work’, Journal of Black Studies27(6): 800–19.
42.
SchmidJ.PatelL. (2014) ‘The Interaction of Local and International Child Welfare Agendas: A South African Case’, International Social Work44(4): 1–10.
43.
SewpaulV. (2006) ‘Global Standards: Promise and Pitfalls for Re-inscribing Social Work in Civil Society’, International Journal of Social Welfare14: 210–7.
44.
SewpaulV.HolscherD. (2004) Social Work in Times of Neoliberalism: A Post-modern Discourse. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.
45.
SherrM.E. (2006) ‘The Afrocentric Paradigm’, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment13(3): 1–17.
SmithL. (2008) ‘South African Social Work Education: Critical Imperatives for Social Change in the Post-Apartheid and Post-colonial Context’, International Social Work51(3): 371–83.
48.
TlostanovaM.MignoloW. (2009) Global Coloniality and the Decolonial Option. Kult 6 – Special Issue Epistemologies of Transformation: The Latin American Decolonial Option and its Ramifications. Roskilde: Department of Culture and Identity, Roskilde University.
49.
TsangA.YanM.SheraW. (2000) ‘Negotiating Multiple Agenda in International Social Work: The Case of China–Canada Collaborative Project (in Social Work and Globalisation)’, Canadian Social Work2(1): 147–61.
50.
TurnerD.D. (2002) ‘An Oral History: Molefi Kente Asante’, Journal of Black Studies32(6): 711–34.
51.
YangR. (2005) ‘Internationalisation, Indigenisation and Educational Research in China’, Australian Journal of Education49(1): 66–88.
52.
YipK.S. (2006) ‘Indigenization of Social Work: An International Perspective and Conceptualization’, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development16(1): 43–55.
53.
YunongH.XiongZ. (2012) ‘Further Discussion of Indigenization in Social Work: A Response to Gray and Coates’, International Social Work55(1): 40–52.
