International service learning (ISL) programs seek to facilitate community inclusion, but such participation can prove elusive. For technical projects, such ventures can undermine local leadership, generate mistrust in communities, and even create an aversion to technological solutions. In this article, we document how social work and engineering students collaborated to bring clean water to rural Guatemala, and demonstrate how we employed social work principles to address the myriad issues encountered in the project. We contend that the inclusion of a social work perspective, with its emphasis on relationships, can help mitigate some of the challenges ISL projects tend to encounter.
AbbottE. (1931) Social Welfare and Professional Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AmadeiB.WallaceW.A. (2009) ‘Engineering for Humanitarian Development’, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine28(4): 6–15.
3.
BerryN.S. (2013) Unsafe Motherhood: Mayan Maternal Mortality and Subjectivity in Post-war Guatemala. New York: Berghahn Books.
4.
BorgJ.P.ZitomerD.H. (2008) ‘Dual-team Model for International Service Learning in Engineering: Remote Solar Water Pumping in Guatemala’, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice134(2): 178–85.
5.
BornsteinD.DavisS. (2010) Social Entrepreneurship: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BringleR.G.HatcherJ.A.JonesS.G. (eds) (2011) International Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Research. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
7.
ByarsP.WoodrowM.Antizar-LadislaoB. (2009) ‘Integrated Method in International Development for Water Solutions Using the Rights-based Approach’, Water Science and Technology60(10): 2713–20.
8.
CoersN.RodriguezM.T.RobertsT.G.EmersonH.C.BarrickR.K. (2012) ‘Examining the Student Impacts of Three International Capstone Experiences’, NACTA Journal56(2): 55–62.
9.
CottamM.L. (1994) Images and Intervention: U.S. Policies in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10.
CrabtreeR.D. (2008) ‘Theoretical Foundations for International Service Learning’, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning15(1): 18–36.
11.
DeeleyS.J. (2010) ‘Service-learning: Thinking Outside the Box’, Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 43–53.
12.
EngstromD.W.OkamuraA. (2007) ‘A Nation of Immigrants: A Call for a Specialization in Immigrant Well-being’, Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work16(3–4): 103–11.
13.
FiskeJ. (1993) Power Plays, Power Works. London: Verso.
14.
FriedmanT.L. (2000) The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Random House, Inc.
15.
GittermanA.GermainC.B. (2008) The Life Model of Social Work Practice: Advances in Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
GragnolatiM.MariniA. (2003) ‘Health and Poverty in Guatemala’, Working Paper No. 2966. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17.
GuestJ.S.SkeriosS.J.BarnardJ.L.BeckM.B.DaiggerG.T.HilgerH.MacphersonL. (2009) ‘A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater’, Environmental Science & Technology43(16): 6126–30.
LynchH.F. (2012) ‘The Rights and Wrongs of Intentional Exposure Research: Contextualising the Guatemala STD Inoculation Study’, Journal of Medical Ethics38(8): 513–15.
Maguire-JackK.NegashT. (2015) ‘Barriers in Access to Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs for Families Involved with Child Protective Services’, Journal of Child Custody12(2): 152–74.
23.
Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social (MSPAS), Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2009) Vencuesta nacional de salud materno infantil 2008–2009. Guatemala: MSPAS.
24.
MontgomeryM.A.ElimelechM. (2007) ‘Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries: Including Health in the Equation’, Environmental Science & Technology41(1): 17–24.
25.
National Association of Social Workers (NASW) (2008) Code of Ethics. Washington, DC: NASW.
26.
NgaiT.K.FennerR.A. (2014) ‘Designing Program Implementation Strategies to Increase the Adoption and Use of Biosand Water Filters in Rural India’, Water Alternatives7(2): 320–41.
27.
NovogratzJ. (2009) The Blue Sweater: Bridging the Gap Between Rich and Poor in an Interconnected World. New York: Rodale.
28.
ParlettM.HamiltonD. (1976) ‘Evaluation as Illumination: A New Approach to the Study of Innovative Programmes’, in GlassG. (ed.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp.140–157.
29.
PorterM.MonardK. (2001) ‘Ayni in the Global Village: Building Relationships of Reciprocity through International Service-learning’, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning8(1): 5–17.
30.
RichmondM. (1917) Social Diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
RohloffP.DiazA.K.DasguptaS. (2011) ‘“Beyond Development”: A Critical Appraisal of the Emergence of Small Health Care Non-governmental Organizations in Rural Guatemala’, Human Organization70(4): 427–37.
32.
SchuttR.K. (2011) Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
SobseyM.D.StauberC.E.CasanovaL.M.BrownJ.M.ElliottM.A. (2008) ‘Point of Use Household Drinking Water Filtration: A Practical, Effective Solution for Providing Sustained Access to Safe Drinking Water in the Developing World’, Environmental Science Technology42(12): 4261–7.
35.
StakeR.E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
StauberC.E.PrintyE.R.McCartyF.A.LiangK.R.SobseyM.D. (2011) ‘Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Plastic Biosand Water Filter in Cambodia’, Environmental Science & Technology46(2): 722–8.
37.
StaudtM. (1999) ‘Barriers and Facilitators to Use of Services following Intensive Family Preservation Services’, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research26(1): 39–49.
38.
SwordW. (2003) ‘Prenatal Care Use among Women of Low Income: A Matter of “Taking Care of Self”’, Qualitative Health Research13(3): 319–32.
39.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2010) Guatemala: Hacia un Estado para el desarrollo humano. Guatemala: UNDP.
