This article examines the challenges that superdiversity and complexity pose for social workers. Taking an ethnographic approach, we focus on the ‘knowledge-in-action’ of social workers in a small service organization in Belgium in order to access their experiences of being professionals in superdiverse contexts. The reflections of the social workers reveal the prominence of three inter-related issues: the social vulnerability of clients, the tensions that arise in coping with differences between personal and professional frameworks and identities, and the discontinuity that challenges the professional self-confidence of social workers. The findings raise important questions for the professional identity of social work.
AnisM. (2005) ‘Talking about Culture in Social Work Encounters: Immigrant Families and Child Welfare in Finland’, European Journal of Social Work8(1): 3–19.
2.
BetancourtJ.GreenA.CarilloE. (2002) Cultural Competence in Health Care: Emerging Frameworks and Practical Approaches. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
3.
BlommaertJ. (2013) Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
4.
BoccagniP. (2014) ‘(Super)Diversity and the Migration–Social Work Nexus: A New Lens on the Field of Access and Inclusion?’, Ethnic and Racial Studies. Epub ahead of print 14November. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980291.
5.
BulcaenC.BlommaertJ. (1999) ‘De constructie van ‘klassieke gevallen’: Case management in de interculturele hulpverlening’, in GlastraF. (ed.) Organisaties en diversiteit: Naar een contextuele benadering van intercultureel management, pp. 139–58. Utrecht: Lemma.
6.
ChauR.C. (2011) ‘The Diversity Based Approach to Culturally Sensitive Practices’, International Social Work54(1): 21–33.
7.
DalrympleJ.BurkeB. (1995) Anti-oppressive Practice: Social Care and the Law. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8.
DansoR. (2007) ‘Emancipating and Empowering De-valued Skilled Immigrants: What Hope Does Anti-oppressive Social Work Practice Offer?’, British Journal of Social Work39(3): 539–55.
9.
DevoreW.SchlesingerE.G. (1999) Ethnic-sensitive Social Work Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
DominelliL. (2002) Anti-oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
DominelliL. (2012) ‘Anti-oppressive Practice’, in GrayM.MidgleyJ.WebbS.A. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Work, pp. 328–40. London: SAGE.
12.
EriksenT.H. (2007) ‘Complexity in Social and Cultural Integration: Some Analytical Dimensions’, Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 1055–69.
13.
FloerschJ. (2004) ‘A Method for Investigating Practitioner Use of Theory in Practice’, Qualitative Social Work3(2): 161–77.
14.
FloerschJ.LonghoferJ.SuskewiczJ. (2014) ‘The Use of Ethnography in Social Work Research’, Qualitative Social Work13(1): 3–7.
15.
FookJ. (2002) ‘Theorizing from Practice: Towards an Inclusive Approach for Social Work Research’, Qualitative Social Work1(1): 79–95.
16.
GarranA.M.Werkmeister RozasL. (2013) ‘Cultural Competence Revisited’, Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work22(2): 97–111.
17.
GredigD.MarshJ.C. (2010) ‘Improving Intervention and Practice’, in ShawI.Briar-LawsonK.OrmeJ.RuckdeschelR. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research, pp. 64–78. London: SAGE.
18.
HarrisonG.TurnerR. (2011) ‘Being a “Culturally Competent” Social Worker: Making Sense of a Murky Concept in Practice’, British Journal of Social Work41: 333–50.
19.
JohnsonY.M.MunchS. (2009) ‘Fundamental Contradictions in Cultural Competence’, Social Work54(3): 220–31.
20.
JönssonJ.H. (2014) ‘Local Reactions to Global Problems: Undocumented Immigrants and Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work44(Suppl. 1): i35–52.
21.
KhanP.DominelliL. (2000) ‘The Impact of Globalization on Social Work in the UK’, European Journal of Social Work3(2): 95–108.
22.
LairdS. (2008) Anti-oppressive Social Work: A Guide for Developing Cultural Competence. London: SAGE.
23.
ListerR. (2004) Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
LumD. (2011) Culturally Competent Practice: A Framework for Understanding Diverse Groups and Justice Issues. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
25.
MeissnerF. (2014) ‘Migration in Migration-related Diversity? The Nexus between Superdiversity and Migration Studies’, Ethnic and Racial Studies. Epub ahead of print 24October. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2015.970209.
26.
MorgaineK.Capous-DesyllasM. (2015) Anti-oppressive Social Work Practice: Putting Theory into Action. London: SAGE.
27.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995) The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
OttosdottirG.EvansR. (2014) ‘Ethics of Care in Supporting Disabled Forced Migrants: Interactions with Professionals and Ethical Dilemmas in Health and Social Care in the South-East of England’, British Journal of Social Work44(Suppl. 1): i53–69.
29.
ParrottL. (2009) ‘Constructive Marginality: Conflicts and Dilemmas in Cultural Competence and Anti-oppressive Practice’, Social Work Education: The International Journal28(6): 617–30.
30.
PayneM. (2005) ‘Anti-discrimination and Cultural and Ethnic Sensitivity’, in PayneM. (ed.) Modern Social Work Theory, pp. 373–402. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
PayneM. (2008) What Is Professional Social Work?Bristol: Policy Press.
32.
PhillimoreJ. (2014) ‘Delivering Maternity Services in an Era of Superdiversity: The Challenges of Novelty and Newness’, Ethnic and Racial Studies. Epub ahead of print 20November. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980288.
33.
PinderhughesE. (1989) Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Power: The Key to Efficacy. New York: Free Press.
34.
PolanyiM. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
Roer-StrierD. (2005) ‘Human Development Education for Student Social Workers in Multicultural Societies’, Social Work Education24(3): 311–26.
36.
SchlesingerE.DevoreW. (1995) ‘Ethnic-sensitive Practice’, in EdwardsR.L. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Social Work, 19th edn.Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers, pp. 902–908.
37.
SchönD.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
38.
SensoyÖDiAngeloR. (2012) Is Everyone Really Equal? An Introduction to Key Concepts in Social Justice Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
SundarP.SylvestreJ.BassiA. (2012) ‘Diversity and Social Work Practice’, in GrayM.MidgleyJ.WebbS.A. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Work, pp. 355–71. London: SAGE.
ValtonenK. (2008) Social Work and Migration: Immigrant and Refugee Settlement and Integration. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
43.
Van der HaarM. (2007) ‘Ma(r)king Differences in Dutch Social Work: Professional Discourse and Ways of Relating to Clients in Context’, PhD Thesis, Dutch University Press, Amsterdam.
44.
Van EwijkH. (2010) European Social Policy and Social Work: Citizenship-based Social Work. Abingdon: Routledge.
45.
Van EwijkH. (2014) Omgaan met sociale complexiteit: Professionals in het sociale domein. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij SWP.
46.
Van RobaeysB.DriessensK. (2011) Gekleurde armoede en hulpverlening: Sociaal werkers en cliënten aan het woord. Leuven: LannooCampus.
47.
Van RobaeysB.VrankenJ.MartinielloM. (2007) De kleur van armoede: Armoede bij personen van buitenlandse herkomst. Leuven: Acco.
48.
VegaW.LopezS. (2001) ‘Priority Issues in Latino Mental Health Services Research’, Mental Health Services Research3(4): 189–200.
49.
VertovecS. (2006) ‘The Emergence of Super-diversity in Britain’, Working Paper no. 25. Oxford: COMPAS, University of Oxford.
50.
VertovecS. (2007) ‘Super-diversity and Its Implications’, Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 1024–54.
51.
VertovecS. (2014) ‘Reading “Super-diversity”’. In AndersonB.KeithM. (Eds.). Migration: The Compas Anthology. Oxford: COMPAS.
52.
VertovecS. (ed.) (2015) Diversities Old and New: Migration and Socio-spatial Patterns in New York, Singapore and Johannesburg. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
