The article constructs children’s rights as a social institution relevant to the multifunctional nature of the contemporary child. In line with the interpretivist approach, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is viewed as a soft law, which requires the pluralization of practices towards international regulations. The juxtaposition of two key approaches to the UNCRC, the double status of the child and the dilemma of public versus private, frames the investigation of the current issues in Russia and Belarus through the discourses operating around children’s rights. The comparison highlights the common shortcomings and the peculiarities, clarifying the possible strategies for refining the implementation of children’s rights in post-Soviet countries.
AstoyantsM. (2006) ‘Politicheskiy diskurs o sirotstve v sovetskiy i postsovetskiy period: sotsial’naya integratsiya ili sotsial’noe iskluchenie?’ [Political Discourse of Orphanhood during Soviet and Post-Soviet Periods: Social Integration and Social Exclusion?], Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noi politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies] 4(4): 475–501.
5.
Beck-GernsheimE. (1998) ‘On the Way to a Post-familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities’, Theory, Culture & Society15(3–4): 53–70.
6.
BurmanE. (1996) ‘Local, Global or Globalized? Child Development and International Child Legislation’, Childhood1(3): 45–66.
7.
ChernikevichA. (2008) ‘About Criminal Behaviour among Minors’, in Children and Abuse, pp. 44–51. Minsk: Ministry of Social Affairs.
8.
Civic Chamber of Russian Federation (2009) ‘About the Situation around Gleb Ageyev’, the transcript of special session of the Commission on citizens’ security and interaction with law enforcement and judicial bodies, Moscow.
9.
EmondR. (2003) ‘Putting the Care into Residential Care: The Role of Young People’, Journal of Social Work3(3): 321–37.
FARE (Federal Agency Russian Education) (2009) ‘Data about Education Centres for Children Out of Parental Care’, Forma No. D-13, Federal State Statistic Observation, Moscow.
12.
ForsbergH.VagliA. (2006) ‘The Social Construction of Emotions in Child Protection Case-talk’, Qualitative Social Work5(1): 9–31.
13.
GruževskisB.SvarinskaitR.ŽaltauskasM.MatskevichS. (2011) ‘Poverty Eradication Measures and the Role of Civil Society: Comparative Analysis of Lithuania and Belarus’, Non-governmental Organizations’ Information and Support Centre, Vilnius.
14.
JamesA. (2011) ‘To Be (Come) or Not to Be (Come): Understanding Children’s Citizenship’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science633(1): 167–79.
15.
KehilyM.J. (ed.) (2009) Introduction to Childhood Studies. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
16.
KellyC. (2007) Children’s World: Growing Up in Russia, 1890–1991. Hartford, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
KellyM.JonesS.WilsonV.LewisP. (2012) ‘How Children’s Rights are Constructed in Family Care: A Review of the Literature’, Journal of Child Health Care16(2): 190–205.
18.
KlinB. (2009) ‘Stay Boy to Corner and Shut Mother in Prison’, available online at: http://izvestia.ru/news/347328 (accessed 26 May 2013).
19.
LeeN. (1996) ‘The Challenge of Childhood: Distributions of Childhood’s Ambiguity in Adult Institutions’, Childhood11(6): 455–74.
20.
LeeN. (2005) Childhood and Human Value: Development, Separation and Separability. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
MaurasM. (2011) ‘Public Policies and Child Rights: Entering the Third Decade of the Convention on the Rights of the Child’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences633(1): 52–65.
National Statistical Committee (2011) Annual Report. Minsk, Belarus: NSC.
25.
NybomJ. (2005) ‘Visibility and ‘‘Child View’ in the Assessment Process of Social Work: Cross-national Comparisons’, International Journal of Social Welfare14(4): 315–25.
26.
PecherskayaN. (2012) ‘Mifologiya roditel’stva: analiz diskursivnogo proizvodstva ideal’noi sem’I’ [Mythology of Parenthood: Analysis of Discourse Construction of Ideal Family], Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noi politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies] 10(3): 323–42.
27.
PutinV. (2013) ‘Address to the Russian Congress of Parents’, available online at: http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/4973 (accessed 26 May 2013).
28.
ReynaertD.Bouverne-de-BieM.VandeveldeS. (2009) ‘Review of Children’s Rights Literature since the Adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’, Childhood16(4): 518–34.
29.
RIA Novosti (2011) ‘Moscow Court Reduces Jail Term to 5 from 13 Years For Russian Convicted Of Pedophilia’, available online at: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20111129/169146654.html (accessed 26 May 2013).
30.
SchmidtV. (2010) ‘Taking Ideas and Discourses Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism’, European Political Science Review2(1): 1–25.
31.
SchmidtV.RasellM. (forthcoming) ‘‘‘Rescue Our Children’’: Discourses of Mental Disability in Russian Campaigns to Reform Residential Care’, Childhood and Society.
ShmidtV. (2012) ‘Orphan Care in Russia: Cause for Dismantling the Down Staircase’, in BaileyJ.D. (ed.) Orphan Care: A Comparative View, pp. 83–100. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
34.
StarovoytovI. (2010) ‘The Implementation of Gender Policy in Belarus’, The Report of the International Conference Women Rights and Balanced Policy Regarding Family, Employment and Gender Equality: Presence and Perspectives, available online at: http://gender-route.org/articles/sex_gender_practice/realizaciya_gendernoj_politiki_v_rb/ (accessed 26 May 2013).
35.
StrandellH. (2009) ‘New Childhood Space and the Question of Difference’, in WintersbergerH.AlanenL.OlkT.QvortrupH. (eds) Childhood, Generational Order and the Welfare State: Exploring Children’s Social and Economic Welfare, Volume 1 of COST A19: Children’s Welfare, pp. 45–57. Odense: University of Southern Denmark Press.
36.
SuttonA. (1980) ‘Backward Children in the USSR: An Unfamiliar Approach to a Familiar Problem’, in BrineJ.PerrieM.SuttonA. (eds) Home, School and Leisure in the Soviet Union, pp. 160–91. London: George Allen and Unwin.
37.
TeplovaT. (2007) ‘Welfare State Transformation, Childcare, and Women’s Work in Russia’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society14(3): 284–322.
38.
United Nations (2002) ‘Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Belarus’, UN Doc. CRC/C/15/Add. 180, 13June.
39.
VanhuysseP. (ed.) (2009) Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
WihstutzA. (2011) ‘Working Vulnerability: Agency of Caring Children and Children’s Rights’, Childhood18(4): 447–59.
42.
WildfireJ.BarthR.GreenR. (2007) ‘Reunification of Children from Foster Care at 18 Months: Findings from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being’, in HaskinsR.WulczynF.WebbM.B. (eds) Child Protection: Using Research to Improve Policy and Practice, pp. 155–70. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
43.
ZolotorA.PutkaM. (2010) ‘Bans against Corporal Punishment: A Systematic Review of the Laws, Changes in Attitudes and Behaviours’, Child Abuse Review19(4): 229–47.
