This article compares features of the redistributive, developmental and productivist models of social policy. Using East Asian welfare systems as examples, it illustrates the application of the productivist and developmental models, and describes the contextual factors influencing these models. It argues that each model is an outgrowth of a particular social, economic and political context. When the context changes, the choice of model will also change, as shown in the recent development of redistributive policies in the East Asian region.
AdemaW.FronP.LadaiqueM (2011) Is the European Welfare State Really More Expensive? Indicators on Social Spending, 1980–2012; and a Manual to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX). Paris: OECD.
2.
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (1999) Key Indicators of Developing Asian and Pacific Countries. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
3.
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2012) Key Indicators of Developing Asian and Pacific Countries. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
4.
Census and Statistics Department (2007) Thematic Report: Household Income Distribution in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
5.
ChanR.K.H. (1996) Welfare in Newly-industrialized Society: The Construction of Welfare State in Hong Kong. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6.
ChanC.K.NgokK. (eds) (2011) Welfare Reform in East Asia: Towards Workfare?London: Routledge.
7.
ChanK.W.LeeJ. (2010) ‘Rethinking the Social Development Approach in the Context of East Asian Social Welfare’, China Journal of Social Work3(1): 19–33.
8.
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (2008) The Survey of Family Income and Expenditure. Taipei: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.
9.
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (2011) The Survey of Family Income and Expenditure. Taipei: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.
10.
DixonJ.KimH.S. (eds) (1985) Social Welfare in Asia. London: Croom Helm.
11.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
GoodinR.E. (2001) ‘Work and Welfare: Towards a Post-productivist Welfare Regime’, British Journal of Political Science31(1): 13–39.
13.
GoughI. (2004) ‘East Asia: The Limits of Productivist Regimes’, in GoughI.WoodG. (eds) Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, pp. 169–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
HollidayI. (2000) ‘Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia’, Political Studies48(4): 706–23.
15.
HollidayI. (2005) ‘East Asia Social Policy in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Farewell to Productivism’, Policy and Politics33(1): 145–62.
16.
HortS.E.O.KuhnleS. (2000) ‘The Coming of East and Southeast Asian Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy10(2): 162–84.
17.
HuangC.C.KuY.W. (2011) ‘Effectiveness of Social Welfare Programmes in East Asia: A Case Study of Taiwan’, Social Policy & Administration45(7): 733–51.
18.
HudsonJ.KühnerS. (2009) ‘Towards Productive Welfare? A Comparative Analysis of 23 OECD Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy19(1): 34–46.
19.
JacobsD. (2000) ‘Low Public Expenditure on Social Welfare: Do East Asian Countries Have a Secret’, International Journal of Social Welfare9(1): 2–16.
20.
JeonJ.G. (1995) ‘Exploring the Three Varieties of East Asia’s State-guided Development Model’, Studies in Comparative International Development30(3): 70–88.
21.
KimM.S. (2008) ‘Why are Welfare States Changing Differently in East Asia?’, at 66th MPSA Annual National Conference, Chicago, IL, 3–6April.
22.
KonoM. (2005) ‘The Welfare Regime in Japan’, in WalkerA.WongC.K. (eds) East Asian Welfare Regime in Transition, pp. 114–44. Bristol: Policy Press.
23.
KwonH.J. (2009) ‘The Reform of the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia’, International Journal of Social Welfare18(Supplement): 12–21.
24.
LeeY.J.KuY.W. (2007) ‘East Asian Welfare Regimes: Testing the Hypothesis of the Developmental Welfare State’, Social Policy & Administration41(2): 197–212.
25.
MidgleyJ. (1995) Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. London: SAGE.
26.
MidgleyJ.SherradenM. (2000) ‘The Social Development Perspective in Social Policy’, in MidgleyJ.TracyM.B.LivermoreM. (eds) The Handbook of Social Policy, pp. 435–46. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
MidgleyJ.TangK.L. (2001) ‘Introduction: Social Policy, Economic Growth and Developmental Welfare’, International Journal of Social Welfare10(4): 244–52.
28.
MkandawireT. (2006) Lessons from the UNRISD Research Projects on Social Policy. New York: UN Economic and Social Council.
29.
MuttonB. (2004) ‘Community Participation: A Bottom Up Approach’, Health Issues81: 19–21.
30.
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2011) The Cost of Social Security in Japan Fiscal Year, 2009. Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
31.
OlaniyanD.A.OkemakindeT. (2008) ‘Human Capital Theory: Implications for Educational Development’, European Journal of Scientific Research24(2): 157–62.
32.
ParkC.JungD. (2009) ‘Making Sense of the Asian Welfare Regimes with the Western Typology’, Korean Journal of Sociology43(3): 57–85.
33.
PiersonC. (1991) Beyond the Welfare State? – The New Political Economy of Welfare. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
RameshM. (1995) ‘Social Security in South Korea and Singapore: Explaining the Differences’, Social Policy & Administration29(3): 228–40.
35.
RoseR.ShiratoriR. (1986) Social Welfare: East and West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
SherradenM. (1988) ‘Rethinking Social Welfare: Toward Assets’, Social Policy18(3): 37–43.
37.
SherradenM. (2005) ‘Asset-building Policy and Programs for the Poor’, in ShapiroT.M.WolffE.N. (eds) Assets for the Poor: Benefits and Mechanisms of Spreading Asset Ownership, pp. 302–23. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
38.
TangK.L. (2000) Social Development in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
39.
TaylorG. (2007) Ideology and Welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
Taylor-GoobyP.DaleJ. (1981) Social Theory and Social Welfare. London: Edward Arnold.
41.
TitmussR.M. (1974) Social Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
42.
WildingP. (2008) ‘Is the East Asian Welfare Model Still Productive’, Journal of Asian Public Policy1(1): 18–31.
43.
WongC.K.WalkerA. (eds) (2005) East Asian Welfare Regimes: From Confucianism to Globalisation. Bristol: Policy Press.
