Workfare has become a dominant social welfare approach in dealing with unemployment in various cities around the world. Recent social security reforms for lone mothers on benefits in Hong Kong are examples of the application of workfare in practice. This article argues that workfare strategy based on an outdated industrial-productivist conception of work contributes to the marginalization and undervaluation of work performed by disadvantaged groups. A reconceptualization of work will help to open up new alternatives in social work practice.
AbramovitzM. (2006) ‘Welfare Reform in the United States: Gender, Race and Class Matter’, Critical Social Policy26(2): 336–64.
2.
BowringF. (1999) ‘Job Scarcity: The Perverted Form of a Potential Blessing’, Sociology33(1): 69–84.
3.
Census and Statistics Department (2009) Women and Men in Hong Kong: Key Statistics 2009 Edition. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
4.
ChanC.K. (2011) ‘Hong Kong: Workfare in the World’s Freest Economy’, International Journal of Social Welfare20(1): 22–32.
5.
ChanK.W. (2008) ‘Deconstructing the Asian Welfare Model: Social Equality Matters’, Journal of Asian Public Policy1(3): 302–12.
6.
ChanK.W.LeeJ. (2010) ‘Rethinking the Social Development Approach in the Context of East Asian Social Welfare’, China Journal of Social Work3(1): 19–33.
7.
ChanR.K.H. (2006) ‘Community Economic Development: Applications and Limitations in Hong Kong’, International Social Work49(4): 483–93.
8.
DeanH. (2003) ‘Re-conceptualising Welfare-to-Work for People with Multiple Problems and Needs’, Journal of Social Policy32(3): 441–59.
9.
DominelliL. (2002) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
EvansP.M. (2007) ‘(Not) Taking Account of Precarious Employment: Workfare Politics and Lone Mothers in Ontario and the UK’, Social Policy and Administration41(1): 29–49.
11.
FinchJ.GrovesD. (eds) (1983) A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12.
FitzpatrickT. (2002) ‘In Search of a Welfare Democracy’, Social Policy and Society1(1): 11–20.
13.
GardinerJ. (2000) ‘Domestic Labour Revisited: A Feminist Critique of Marxist Economics’, in HimmelweitS. (ed.) Inside the Household: From Labour to Care, pp. 80–101. London: Macmillan.
14.
Gibson-GrahamJ.K. (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
GiddensA. (2000) The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
16.
GorzA. (1999) Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage-Based Society. Cambridge, Oxford and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
17.
GrintK. (1998) The Sociology of Work: An Introduction, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
HimmelweitS. (ed.) (2000) Inside the Household: From Labour to Care. London: Macmillan.
19.
HoA.P.Y.ChanK.T. (2010) ‘The Social Impact of Work-integration Social Enterprise in Hong Kong’, International Social Work53(1): 33–45.
KempA.A.JenkinsP.BiehlM. (1996) ‘Reconceptualizing Women’s Work: A Focus on the Domestic and Eligibility Work of Women on Welfare’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare23(3): 69–89.
22.
KnijnT.MartinC.MillarJ. (2007) ‘Activation as a Common Framework for Social Policies towards Lone Parents’, Social Policy and Administration41(6): 638–52.
LevitasR. (2001) ‘Against Work: A Utopian Incursion into Social Policy’, Critical Social Policy21(4): 449–65.
25.
ListerR. (2006) ‘Children (but not Women) First: New Labour, Child Welfare and Gender’, Critical Social Policy26(2): 315–35.
26.
MackintoshM. (2000) ‘The Contingent Household: Gender Relations and the Economics of Unpaid Labour’, in HimmelweitS. (ed.) Inside the Household: From Labour to Care, pp. 120–42. London: Macmillan.
27.
McCrateE.SmithJ. (1998) ‘When Work Doesn’t Work: The Failure of Current Welfare Reform’, Gender and Society12(1): 61–80.
28.
MillarJ. (2006) ‘Better-off in Work? Work, Security and Welfare for Lone Mothers’, in GlendinningC.KempP. (eds) Cash and Care, pp. 171–86. Bristol: Policy Press.
29.
MillarJ.RowlingsonK. (eds) (2001) Lone Parents, Employment and Social Policy: Cross-national Comparisons. Bristol: Policy Press.
30.
Ming Pao (2005) ‘Hong Kong University Professor Calls for a Change in the Culture of Dependency’, Ming Pao, 10May, A10 (in Chinese).
31.
MorseN.C.WeissR.S. (1955) ‘The Function and Meaning of Work and the Job’, American Sociological Review20(2): 191–8.
32.
MullalyB. (2002) Challenging Oppression: A Critical Social Work Approach. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
33.
OakleyA. (1974) The Sociology of Housework. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
34.
PillingerJ. (2000) ‘Redefining Work and Welfare in Europe: New Perspectives on Work, Welfare and Time’, in LewisG.GewirtzS.ClarkeJ. (eds) Rethinking Social Policy, pp. 323–36. London: SAGE.
35.
PollackS.CaragataL. (2010) ‘Contestation and Accommodation: Constructions of Lone Mothers’ Subjectivity through Workfare Discourse and Practice’, Affilia25(3): 264–77.
36.
PowellF. (2001) ‘Multiculturalism, Feminism and Anti-oppressive Practice’, in The Politics of Social Work, pp. 142–56. London: SAGE.
37.
PowellM. (2000) ‘New Labour and the Third Way in the British Welfare State: A New and Distinctive Approach?’, Critical Social Policy20(1): 39–60.
38.
RakeK. (2001) ‘Gender and New Labour’s Social Policies’, Journal of Social Policy30(2): 209–31.
39.
RojekC. (2002) ‘Civil Labour, Leisure and Post-work Society’, Society and Leisure25(1): 21–35.
40.
RuberyJ.SmithM.FaganC.GrimshawD. (1998) Women and European Employment. London: Routledge.
41.
Social Security Concern Group (2007) Research Report on the Impact of New Dawn Project on Lone Parent Social Security Recipients. Hong Kong: Social Security Concern Group (in Chinese).
42.
Social Welfare Department (1998) Support for Self Reliance: Report on Review of the Comprehensive Social Security Assistance Scheme. Hong Kong: Social Welfare Department.
43.
Social Welfare Department (2005) The Intensive Employment Assistance Projects under the New Dawn Project (NDIEAPs): Important Notes to Applicant Organization. Hong Kong: Social Welfare Department.
