Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In recent years, the financial sustainability of local authorities has been recognised as a concept of crucial importance in ensuring that public services may continue to be delivered to future generations. Although many European countries have implemented programmes to enhance their financial sustainability, local authorities are characterised by differing administrative traditions and achieve diverse outcomes in response to the reforms made. Taking a comparative approach, the present study identifies institutional, macroeconomic and microeconomic factors that might influence local authorities’ financial sustainability in England and Spain in order to determine and explain similarities and differences in the drivers and risk factors for financial sustainability in local authorities’ provision of public services.

Points for practitioners

This article is based on three major theories (agency theory, neo-institutional theory and stakeholder theory) related to the institutional, macroeconomic and microeconomic factors determining financial sustainability and aims to identify these factors comparing different contexts (English and Spanish contexts). This identification of factors that influence municipal financial sustainability could clarify what policymakers might have done to prevent the crisis, what they should do to prevent similar failures in the future and how the long-term provision of public services may be ensured.

Keywords

financial sustainability intergenerational equity local authorities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

(2015) Vertical consolidation and financial sustainability: Evidence from English local government. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33(6): 1518–1545.

Bies

(2010) Evolution of nonprofit self-regulation in Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, DOI: 10.1177/0899764010371852.

Blazy R, Chopard B, Nigam N (2013) Building legal indexes to explain recovery rates: An analysis of the French and English bankruptcy codes. Journal of Banking & Finance 37: 1936–1959.

Brundtland

(1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: ‘Our Common Future’ (ed. WCED). United Nations.

Carpenter

Feroz

(2001) Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(7/8): 565–596.

Choi

Bae

S-S

Kwon

S-W

, et al. (2010) County limits: Policy types and expenditure priorities. The American Review of Public Administration 40(1): 29–45.

Coase

(1984) The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics : 229–231.

Conard

(2013) Some challenges to sustainability. Sustainability 5(8): 3368–3381.

Dasí

Montesinos

Murgui

(2013) Comparative analysis of governmental accounting diversity in the European Union. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(3): 255–273.

10.

Daude

Stein

(2007) The quality of institutions and foreign direct investment. Economics & Politics 19(3): 317–344.

11.

Drew

Dollery

(2014) The impact of metropolitan amalgamations in Sydney on municipal financial sustainability. Public Money & Management 34(4): 281–288.

12.

Eisenhardt

(1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science 31(2): 134–149.

13.

EU (European Union) (2016) Fiscal Sustainability Report. Luxembourg: European Union. https://doi.org/10.2765/412671. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu

14.

Eurostat (2015) Sustainable Development in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

15.

Freeman

(1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

16.

Guillamón

Benito

Bastida

(2011) Evaluación de la deuda pública local en España. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad XL(150): 251–285.

17.

Hansen

(1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4): 1029–1054.

18.

HM Treasury (2015a) A country that lives within its means – spending review 2015 (CM 9112). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/

19.

HM Treasury (2015b) Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015. UK: OGL: Open Government Licence. Available at: www.gov.uk

20.

Hoffman

(2001) Linking organizational and field-level analyses. Organization & Environment 14(2): 133–156.

21.

International Federation of Accountants (2012) Reporting on the Long-term Sustainability of a Public Sector Entity’s Finances. New York, NY: IFAC.

22.

International Federation of Accountants (2013) Recommended Practice Guideline. Reporting on the Long-term Sustainability of an Entity’s Finances. Toronto: IFAC.

23.

Kloha

Weissert

Kleine

(2005) Someone to watch over me: State monitoring of local fiscal conditions. The American Review of Public Administration 35(3): 236–255.

24.

Laffin

(2016) Planning in England: New Public Management, network governance or post-democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences 82(2): 354–372.

25.

Local Government Association (2017) Homepage. Available at: http://www.local.gov.uk/

26.

Liguori

(2012) Radical change, accounting and public sector reforms: A comparison of Italian and Canadian municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management 28(4): 437–463.

27.

Mackey T (2014) An analysis of Spain's sovereign debt risk premium. The Park Place Economist 22(1), 67–77.

28.

Ministerio de Hacienda y Función Pública (Ministry of Finance and Public Function) (2017) Homepage. Available at: www.minhafp.gob.es

29.

Muñoz-Cañavate

Hípola

(2011) Electronic administration in Spain: From its beginnings to the present. Government Information Quarterly 28(1): 74–90.

30.

National Audit Office (2014) Financial Sustainability of Local Authorities. London: The Stationery Office. Available at: http://www.nao.org.uk/

31.

Navarro-Galera

Rayo-Cantón

Lara-Rubio

, et al. (2015) Loan price modelling for local governments using risk premium analysis. Applied Economics 47(58): 6257–6276.

32.

Navarro-Galera

Rodríguez-Bolívar

Alcaide-Muñoz

, et al. (2016) Measuring the financial sustainability and its influential factors in local governments. Applied Economics 48(41): 1–15.

33.

Ortiz-Rodriguez

Navarro-Galera

Alcaraz-Quiles

(2015) The influence of administrative culture on sustainability transparency in European local governments. Administration & Society, DOI: 10.1177/0095399715616838.

34.

Randma-Liiv

Kickert

(2017) The impact of the fiscal crisis on public administration reforms: Comparison of 14 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 19(2): 155–172.

35.

Rodríguez

Navarro

Alcaide

(2014) New development: The role of accounting in assessing local government sustainability. Public Money & Management 34(3): 233–236.

36.

Rodríguez-Bolívar

Navarro-Galera

López-Subirés

, et al. (2018) Analysing the accounting measurement of financial sustainability in local governments through political factors. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31(8): 2135–2164.

37.

Rogers

Pendleton

Goudy

, et al. (1978) Industrialization, income benefits and the rural community. Rural Sociology 43(2): 250–264. Available at: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US19780329368 (accessed 13 January 2015).

38.

Sutaria

Hicks

(2004) New firm formation: Dynamics and determinants. The Annals of Regional Science 38(2): 241–262.

39.

Watt

(2004) Financing local government. Local Government Studies 30(4): 609–623.

40.

Windmeijer

(2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics 126(1): 25–51.

41.

Wooldridge

(2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (4th edn). Canada: Paraninfo Cengage Learning.

42.

Zhu

(2013) Panel data analysis in public administration: Substantive and statistical considerations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(2): 395–428.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB

The financial sustainability of local authorities in England and Spain: a comparative empirical study

Abstract

Points for practitioners

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material