Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper considers a range of time-related issues in the comparative empirical study of the American States and demonstrates how visualizations animated to show change over time can provide information that summary statistics do not. Issues discussed include proactive and reactive policies, proper measurement of money over time, and proper linking of variables over time. Relationships with nearly identical annual correlations can exhibit strikingly different scatterplot animations. Visualization tools can help us recognize and better understand temporal phenomena.

Points for practitioners

Just as visualizations are helpful in data analysis, visualizations animated to show change over time are helpful in analysis of cross-sectional time-series data

Animated scatterplots show change over time for individual units of analysis and the sample or population as a whole

Animated visualizations can add richness and texture to understanding of empirical phenomena; they can stimulate insights, develop hypotheses and test hypotheses

Animated visualizations can highlight temporal components

Keywords

cross-sectional time-series data animation educational attainment education spending poverty welfare

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam

(2004) Time. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press, Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Adam B (2008) Of timescapes, futurescapes and timeprints. Lüneburg University, 17. Available at: http://131.251.0.86/socsi/resources/Lueneburg%20Talk%20web%20070708.pdf (accessed 11 April 2014).

Anscombe

(1973) Graphs in statistical analysis. The American Statistician 27(1): 17–21.

Battista V and Cheng E (2011) Motion charts: Telling stories with statistics. American Statistical Association Joint Statistical Meetings, 4473. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st110110.pdf (accessed 11 April 2014).

Baum

Payea

(2010) Education pays, 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. trends in higher education series. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center .

Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Williams DR and Pamuk E (2010) Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: What the patterns tell us. American Journal of Public Health 100(S1): S186–S196.

Day

Newburger

(2002) The Big Payoff: Educational Attainment and Synthetic Estimates of Work-life Earnings, Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.

Elchardus

(1988) The rediscovery of chronos: The new role of time in sociolocical theory. International Sociology 3(1): 35–59.

Goetz

Meyer-Sahling

(2009) Political time in the EU: Dimensions, perspectives, theories. Journal of European Public Policy 16(2): 180–201.

10.

Grzymala-Busse

(2011) Temporality and the analysis of causal mechanisms and processes. Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 1267–1297.

11.

Howlett

(2009) Process sequencing policy dynamics: Beyond homeostasis and path dependency. Journal of Public Policy 29(3): 241–262.

12.

Howlett

Rayner

(2006) Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences 39(1): 1–18.

13.

Kittel

(1999) Sense and sensitivity in pooled analysis of political data. European Journal of Political Research 35(2): 225–253.

14.

Luttbeg

(1992) Comparing the States and Communities: Politics, Government, and Policy in the United States, 1st edition. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

15.

Luttbeg

(1999) Comparing the States and Communities: Politics, Government, and Policy in the United States, 5th edition. Dubuque, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishing.

16.

Luttbeg

(2005) Comparing the States and Communities: Politics, Government, and Policy in the United States, 6th edition. Peosta, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishing.

17.

Meyer-Sahling

Goetz

(2009) The EU timescape: From notion to research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 16(2): 325–336.

18.

Nowotny

(1992) Time and social theory: Towards a social theory of time. Time and Society 1(3): 421–454.

19.

Pierson

(2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

20.

Pollitt

(2008) Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Sharkansky

(1967) Government expenditures and public services in the American states. American Political Science Review 61(4): 1066–1077.

22.

Skowronek

(2008) Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Tucker HJ (1982) Its about time: the use of time in cross-sectional state policy research. American Journal of Political Science 26(1): 176–196.

24.

Tucker HJ and Luttbeg NR (2011) Comparing the States and Communities: Politics, Government and Policy in the United States (revised 8th ed.). College Station, TX: Texas Press.

25.

Tufte

(1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

Visualizing timescape issues in a comparative study of the American states

Abstract

Points for practitioners

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References