The goal of nation-building is to build the collective capacity to achieve public results and to pursue a shared vision of the future. This article, which is based on a theoretical vantage point and the author’s experience as a senior public official, explores the theme of collective capacity-building from the point of view of government. It describes how achieving collective results requires institutional and organizational capacities but, building on these foundations, governments must also develop greater capacity to anticipate, innovate and adapt in the face of increasingly complex public issues and unpredictable circumstances.
Points for practitioners
Building institutional capacity has been a focus of governments for many decades and, indeed, centuries. Building organizational capacity has been the centrepiece of reforms since the 1980s. But public organizations are not yet aligned with the complex problems they are expected to address. Addressing complexity and uncertainty will likely require practitioners to work with (i) a broader definition of public results, (ii) an expanded view of the role of government and of the range of possible relationships between government and citizens, and (iii) a more dynamic approach to public administration.
Adger, W.N. ( 2006) ‘Vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change16: 268-81.
2.
Allenby, B. and Fink, J. ( 2005) ‘Toward Inherently Secure and Resilient Societies’ , Science309: 1034-6.
3.
Anderies, J.M., Walker, B.H. and Kinzig, A.P. ( 2006) ‘Fifteen Weddings and a Funeral: Case Studies and Resilience-based Management’, Ecology and Society11(1), 21-32.
4.
Atlee, T. ( 2008) ‘Co-intelligence, Collective Intelligence, and Conscious Evolution’, in M. Tovey (ed.) Collective Intelligence: Creating a Prosperous World at Peace, pp. 5-14. Oakton, VA: Earth Intelligence Network.
5.
Berkes, F. ( 2007) ‘Understanding Uncertainty and Reducing Vulnerability: Lessons from Resilience Thinking’, Natural Hazards41: 283-95.
6.
Berkes, F. and Folke, C. ( 2002) ‘Back to the Future: Ecosystem Dynamics and Local Knowledge’, in L.H. Gunderson and C.S. Holling (eds) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, pp. 121-46. Washington, DC: Island Press.
7.
Bingham, L.B., Nabatchi, T. and O’Leary, R. ( 2005) ‘The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government’, Public Administration Review65(5): 547-58.
8.
Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. ( 2008) Managing Performance: International Comparisons. New York: Routledge.
9.
Bourgon, J. ( 2007) ‘Responsive, Responsible and Respected Government: Towards a New Public Administration Theory’, International Institute of Administrative Sciences73(1): 7-26.
10.
Bourgon, J. ( 2008a) ‘Performance Management: It’s the Results that Count’, Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration30(1): 41-58.
11.
Bourgon, J. ( 2008b) ‘The Future of Public Service: A Search for a New Balance’, Australian Journal of Public Administration67(4): 390-404.
12.
Bourgon, J. ( 2009) ‘Why Should Governments Engage Citizens in Service Delivery and Policy Making?’, in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (ed.) Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement for Better Policy and Services, pp. 171-177. Paris : OECD. Retrieved 2 January 2009 from: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2008doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00005FB6?OpenDocument
13.
Bovaird, T. ( 2008) ‘Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptive Systems’, Public Management Review10(3): 319-40.
14.
Comfort, L. ( 1994) ‘Risk and Resilience: Inter-organizational Learning Following the Northridge Earthquake of 17 January 1994’, Risk and Resilience2(3): 157-70.
15.
Dale, A. and Onyx, J. ( 2005) A Dynamic Balance: Social Capital and Sustainable Community Development. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
16.
Denhardt, J.V. and Denhardt, R.B. ( 2003) The New Public Service, Serving, not Steering. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
17.
Duit, A. and Galaz, V. ( 2008) ‘Governance and Complexity - Emerging Issues for Governance Theory’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions3(21): 311-35.
18.
Friedman, T.L. ( 2005) The World is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century . New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux .
19.
Goldstein, J. ( 1999) ‘Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues’ , Emergence: Complexity and Organization1: 49-72.
20.
Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C. (eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21.
Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. and Light, S.S. ( 1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Habegger, B. ( 2009) Horizon Scanning in Government. Zurich : Centre for Security Studies. Retrieved 17 June 2009 from: http://se2.isn.ch/serviceengine/FileContent?serviceID=11&fileid=3D89E3D1-55A8-8622-F380-69C677A36478&lng=en
23.
Halligan, J. ( 2007) ‘Reform Design and Performance in Australia and New Zealand’, in T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds) Transcending New Public Management: the Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, pp. 44-64. Aldershot : Ashgate.
24.
Hanson, B. and Roberts, L. ( 2005) ‘Resiliency in the Face of Disaster’, Science309: 1029.
25.
Haveri, A. ( 2006) ‘Complexity in Local Government Change: Limits to Rational Reforming’, Public Management Review1(8): 31-46.
26.
Haynes, P. ( 2003) Managing Complexity in the Public Services. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
27.
Ho, P. ( 2008) ‘Governance at the Leading Edge: Black Swans, Wild Cards and Wicked Problems’, Ethos4: 74-9.
28.
Holland, J.H. ( 1998) Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Helix Books.
29.
Holling, C.S. ( 1973) ‘Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems’ , Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4: 1-23.
30.
Holling, C.S. ( 1986) ‘Resilience of Ecosystems: Local Surprise and Global Change’, in W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn (eds) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, pp. 292-317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Holling, C.S. ( 2001) ‘Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems’, Ecosystems4(5): 390-405.
32.
Holling, C.S. and Meffe, G.K. ( 1996) ‘Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management’, Conservation Biology10: 328-37.
33.
Irvin, R. and Stansbury, J. ( 2004) ‘Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?’, Public Administration Review64(1): 55-65.
34.
Kahane, A. ( 2004) Solving Tough Problems: An Open Way of Talking, Listening and Creating New Realities. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
35.
Katz, Richard ( 2009) ‘The Japan Fallacy’, Foreign Affairs88(2): 9-14.
36.
Kernaghan, Kenneth (2009) ‘Moving Towards IntegratedPublic Governance: Improving Service Delivery through Community Engagement’, International Review of Administrative Sciences75(2): 239-54.
37.
Kettl, D. ( 2002) The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-first Century America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
Klijn, E.-H. ( 2008) ‘Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New?’, Public Management Review10(3): 299-317.
39.
Klijn, E.-H. and Teisman, G. ( 2006) ‘Complexity Theory and Public Administration: A Critical Appraisal’, paper presented at the XI International Research Symposium of Public Management, 2-4 April, University of Potsdam.
40.
Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E.-H. ( 2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem-solving and Decision-making. London: Routledge.
41.
Lebel, L., Anderies, J.M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T.P. and Wilson, J. ( 2006) ‘Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-ecological Systems’, Ecology and Society11(1): 19-37.
42.
Lenihan, D., Milloy, J., Fox, G. and Barber, T. ( 2007) Progressive Governance forCanadian s: What You Need to Know. Ottawa: Public Policy Forum .
43.
Levinthal, D.A. and Warglien, M. ( 1999) ‘Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds’, Organizational Science10(3): 342-57.
44.
Longstaff, P.H. and Yang, S. ( 2008) ‘Communication Management and Trust: Their Role in Building Resilience to "Surprises" Such as Natural Disasters, Pandemic Flu, and Terrorism’, Ecology and Society13(1). Retrieved 21 April 2009 from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1art3/main.html
45.
Lukensmeyer, C.J. ( 2007) ‘Large-scale Citizen Engagement and the Rebuilding of New Orleans: A Case Study’, National Civic Review96(3): 3-15.
46.
McManus S., Seville, E., Brundon, D. and Vargo, J. ( 2007) Resilience Management: A Framework for Assessing and Improving the Resilience of Organizations. Resilient organizations research programme . University of Canterbury, Christchurch , New Zealand. Retrieved 2 January 2009 from: http://www.resorgs.org.nz/pubs.shtml
47.
Mahbubani, K. ( 2009) ‘The Dangers of Democratic Delusions’, Ethics and International Affairs1(23): 19-25.
48.
Malone, T.W. ( 2008) ‘What is Collective Intelligence and What Will We Do About it?’, in M. Tovey (ed.) Collective Intelligence: Creating a Prosperous World at Peace, pp. 1-4. Oakton, VA: Earth Intelligence Network.
49.
Masten, A.S. and Obradovic, J. ( 2008) ‘Disaster Preparation and Recovery: Lessons from Research on Resilience in Human Development’, Ecology and Society13(1): 9-36.
50.
Menon, K.U. ( 2005) ‘National Resilience: From Bouncing Back to Prevention’ , Ethos11(1): 14-17.
51.
Mitleton-Kelly, E. ( 2008) ‘Ten Principles of Complexity and Enabling Infrastructures’ , in E. Mitleton-Kelly (ed.) Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations: The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations, pp. 23-51. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
52.
Morgan, G. ( 1997) Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Mulgan, G. ( 2007) Social Innovation: What is it, Why it Matters and How it can be Accelerated. Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneurship Working Paper, SAID Business School, University of Oxford, 1-51. Retrieved 2 January 2009 from: http://www.youngfoundation.org.uk/files/images/03_07_What_it_is__SAID_.pdf
54.
Murphy, B.L. ( 2007) ‘Locating Social Capital in Resilient Community-level Emergency Management’, Natural Hazards41: 297-315.
55.
Newman, L.L. and Dale, A. ( 2005) ‘Network Structure, Diversity, and Proactive Resilience Building: A Response to Tompkins and Adger’, Ecology and Society10(1). Retrieved 24 January 2009 from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2
56.
Nicholls, R.J., Wong, P.P., Burkett, V.R., Codignotto, J.O., Hay, J.E., McLean, R.F., Ragoonaden, S. and Woodroffe, C.D. ( 2007) ‘Coastal Systems and Low-lying Areas’, in M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 315-56. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
57.
Norris, F., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F. and Pfefferbaum, R.L. ( 2008) ‘Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness’, American Journal of Community Psychology41: 127-50.
58.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ( 2008) From Open to Inclusive: Building Citizen-centered Policy and Services. Retrieved 2 January 2009 from: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2008doc.nsf/ENGDATCORPLOOK/NT00000E9A/$FILE/JT03243619.PDF
59.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ( 2009) Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement for Better Policy and Services. Paris: OECD.
60.
Perri 6, Leat , D., Seltzer, K. and Stoker, G. (2002) Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave.
61.
Pollitt, Christopher ( 2003) ‘Joined-up Government: A Survey’, Political Studies Review1(1): 34-49.
62.
Pollitt, C. ( 2006) ‘Performance Information for Democracy: The Missing Link?’, Evaluation12(1): 38-55.
63.
Pollitt, C. ( 2007) ‘"Towards a New Public Administration Theory": Some Comments on Jocelyne Bourgon’s 5th Braibant Lecture’, International Review of Administrative Sciences73(1): 37-41.
64.
Salamon, L. ( 2002) The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
65.
Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W.A. and Holmgren, M. ( 2002) ‘Dynamic Interaction of Societies and Ecosystems - Linking Theories from Ecology, Economy and Sociology’, in L.H. Gunderson and C.S. Holling (eds) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, pp. 195-239. Washington, DC: Island Press.
66.
Schultz, W. ( 2006) ‘The Cultural Contradictions of Managing Change: Using Horizon Scanning in an Evidence-based Policy Context’, Foresight: The Journal of Future Studies8(4): 3-12.
67.
Senge, P. ( 1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday .
68.
Senge, P. ( 2004) ‘Preface’, in A. Kahane, Solving Tough Problems: An Open Way of Talking, Listening and Creating New Realities. San Francisco, CA : Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
69.
Teisman, G.R. and Klijn, E.-H. ( 2008) ‘Complexity Theory and Public Management’ , Public Management Review10(3): 287-97.
70.
Thomas, J.C. ( 1995) Public Participation in Public Decisions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71.
United Nations (2007) Public Administration and Development. Report of the Secretary-General. Sixty-second session, General Assembly. Retrieved 2 January 2009 from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan027432.pdf
72.
United Nations Economic and Social Affairs ( 2005) Participatory Planning and Budgeting at the Sub-national Level. New York: United Nations .
73.
Van Dooren, W., Thijs, N. and Bouckaert, G. ( 2004) ‘Quality Management and the Management of Quality in European Public Administration’, in E. Loffler and M. Vintar (eds) Improving the Quality of East and West European Public Services, pp. 91-106. Aldershot : Ashgate.
74.
Wagenaar, H. ( 2007) ‘Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline’, American Review of Public Administration37(1): 17-50.
75.
Westley, F., Zimmerman, B. and Patton, M. ( 2006) Getting to Maybe: How the World is Changed. Toronto: Random House.
76.
World Bank Participation and Civic Engagement Team ( 2003) Case Study 2 - Porto Alegre, Brazil: Participatory Approaches in Budgeting and Public Expenditure Management. Social Development Notes, 71 (March 2003). Retrieved 3 September 2009 from: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/238102/1.1.2%20sdn71.pdf
