Transparency is Not Associated With Participation: Antecedents and Differences in Trust in Federal and State Government in the Australian State of Western Australia
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2026
Transparency is Not Associated With Participation: Antecedents and Differences in Trust in Federal and State Government in the Australian State of Western Australia
Trust in government and its antecedents may differ for different levels of government. This article examines the little-studied Australian state of Western Australia (WA). Drawing on a representative online panel survey, and testing three groups of hypotheses, we look at perceptions of ethical government, performance as measured by satisfaction, trust in government, political participation, and perceptions of transparency, and the interrelationship between these variables. Trust in state government is higher than in federal government in WA across a number of measures. Perceptions of performance and ethical government are also higher at state level, while respondents are more likely to participate in politics at state level. Perceptions of transparency are associated with trust in government at both state and federal level, as well as being related to perceptions of ethical government and performance. However, transparency is not related to political participation at either state or federal level.
BaronRueben M.KennyDavid A.1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173–82.
3.
BernerMaureenSmithSonya. 2004. “The State of the States: A Review of State Requirements for Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process.”State and Local Government Review36 (2): 140–50.
4.
BiddleNicholasGrayMatthewMcAllisterIan. 2024. “Federalism and Confidence in Australian Governments during the COVID-19 Pandemic.”Publius: The Journal of Federalism54 (2): 257–82.
5.
ChenCanGanapatiSukumar. 2023. “Do Transparency Mechanisms Reduce Government Corruption? A Meta-Analysis.”International Review of Administrative Sciences89 (1): 257–72.
6.
ChristensenTomLægreidPer. 2005. “Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography.”Public Performance & Management Review28 (4): 487–511.
7.
ColeRichard L.KincaidJohn. 2000. “Public Opinion and American Federalism: Perspectives on Taxes, Spending, and Trust—An ACIR Update.”Publius: The Journal of Federalism30 (1): 189–201.
8.
CowanRobertCarlingSimon. 2021. “Attitudes to a Post-Covid Australia.” Analysis Paper 25. Sydney, NSW: The Centre for Independent Studies.
9.
DardanelliPaoloKincaidJohnFennaAlanKaiserAndréLecoursAndréSinghAjay Kumar. 2018. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Theorizing Dynamic De/Centralization in Federations.”Publius: The Journal of Federalism49 (1): 1–29.
10.
EtzioniAmitai. 2010. “Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant?”Journal of Political Philosophy18 (4): 389–404.
11.
FennaA.2018. “The Centralization of Australian Federalism 1901–2010: Measurement and Interpretation.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism49 (1): 30–56.
12.
FennaAlanGoldfinchShaun. 2023. “The Politics and Policy of COVID-19 in Australia and New Zealand.” In Crisis Leadership and Public Governance during the Covid-19 Pandemic: International Comparisons, edited by CheungAnthony Bing LeungVan ThielSandra, 211–36. Singapore: World Scientific.
13.
FrenchRobert. 2012. “The Incredible Shrinking Federation: Voyage to a Singular State.” In The Future of Australian Federalism: Comparative and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by ApplebyGabrielleAroneyNicholasJohnThomas, 39–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GalliganBrian. 1995. A Federal Republic: Australia’s Constitutional System of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GalliganBrian. 2012. “Fiscal Federalism: Then and Now.” In The Future of Australian Federalism: Comparative and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by ApplebyGabrielleAroneyNicholasJohnThomas, 320–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GoldfinchShaunGauldRobinHerbisonPeter. 2009. “The Participation Divide? Political Participation, Trust in Government, and E-Government in Australia and New Zealand.”Australian Journal of Public Administration68 (3): 333–50.
17.
GoldfinchShaunTaplinRoss. 2022. “A Cross-Sectional International Study Shows Confidence in Public Health Scientists Predicts Use of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions.”BMC Public Health22 (1): 662.
18.
GoldfinchShaunTaplinRossGauldRobin. 2021. “Trust in Government Increased during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Australia and New Zealand.”Australian Journal of Public Administration80 (1): 3–11.
19.
GoldfinchShaunYamamotoKiyoshiAoyagiSaizo. 2023. “Does Process Matter More for Predicting Trust in Government? Participation, Performance, and Process, in Local Government in Japan.”International Review of Administrative Sciences89 (3): 842–63.
20.
GrimmelikhuijsenStephan G.PiotrowskiSuzanne J.Van RyzinGregg G.2020. “Latent Transparency and Trust in Government: Unexpected Findings from two Survey Experiments.”Government Information Quarterly37 (4): 101497.
21.
GrimmelikhuijsenStephan G.PorumbescuGregoryHongBoramImTobin. 2013. “The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross-National Comparative Experiment.”Public Administration Review73 (4): 575–86.
22.
HoodChristopherHealdDavid, eds. 2006. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?London: British Academy.
23.
JedwabJackKincaidJohn, eds. 2018. Identities, Trust, and Cohesion in Federal Systems: Public Perspectives. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
24.
JensenColtPiatakJaclyn. 2023. “Public Service Motivation and Trust in Government: An Examination across the Federal, State, and Local Levels in the United States.”The American Review of Public Administration54 (2): 107–118.
25.
KrahRedeemer Dornudo YaoMertensGerard. 2020. “Transparency in Local Governments: Patterns and Practices of Twenty-First Century.”State and Local Government Review52 (3): 200–213.
26.
LangellaCeciliaAnessi-PessinaEugenioRedmayneNives BoticaSiciliaMariafrancesca. 2023. “Financial Reporting Transparency, Citizens’ Understanding, and Public Participation: A Survey Experiment Study.”Public Administration101 (2): 584–603.
LecoursAndré. 2021. Constitutional Politics in Multinational Democracies. Edited by Brassard-DionNikolaLaforestGuy. 1st ed. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
29.
LecoursAndréBélandDaniel. 2019. “From Secessionism to Regionalism: The Changing Nature of Territorial Politics in Western Australia.”Regional & Federal Studies29 (1): 25–44.
30.
MabillardVincent. 2022. “Trust in Government: Assessing the Impact of Exposure to Information in a Local Context.”International Journal of Public Administration45 (9): 687–96. doi:10.1080/01900692.2020.1868505.
31.
ManningNickGuerreroAlejandro. 2013. “Why Do Politicians Reform? Do They Know Something about the Drivers of Trust in Government?” In Trust and Confidence in Government and Public Services, edited by LlewellynSueBrookesStephenMahonAnn, 80–120. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
Mein SmithPhilippaHempenstallPeter J.GoldfinchShaun. 2008. Remaking the Tasman World. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University Press.
33.
MuthomiFrankline. 2024. “Perceived Values of Public Participation Practices in Budgeting: Insights from Incorporated Local Governments in Oregon.”State and Local Government Review56 (2): 196–206.
34.
ParkHeungsikBlenkinsoppJohn. 2011. “The Roles of Transparency and Trust in the Relationship between Corruption and Citizen Satisfaction.”International Review of Administrative Sciences77 (2): 254–74.
35.
PearsEmilySydnorEmily. 2022. “The Correlates and Characteristics of American State Identity.”Publius: The Journal of Federalism52 (2): 173–200.
36.
PorumbescuGregory A.2015. “Using Transparency to Enhance Responsiveness and Trust in Local Government:Can It Work?”State and Local Government Review47 (3): 205–213.
37.
PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
38.
PutnamRobertLeonardiRobertNanettiRaffaella Y.1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
SandersWill. 2024. Fiscal Equalization in Australian Federalism: Managing Diversity of Size among Subnational Jurisdictions. In Fiscal Federalism and Diversity Accommodation in Multilevel States: A Comparative Outlook, edited by CaroFrancisco Javier RomeroValdesaliciAlice, 41–84. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
40.
SchnellSabina. 2018. “Cheap Talk or Incredible Commitment? (Mis)calculating Transparency and Anti-Corruption.”Governance31 (3): 415–30.
41.
ScottL. GreerBélandDanielLecoursAndréDubinKenneth A.2023. Putting Federalism in Its Place: The Territorial Politics of Social Policy Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
42.
WeinschenkAaron C.HelpapDavid J.2015. “Political Trust in the American States.”State and Local Government Review47 (1): 26–34.
43.
WilkinsonGeorgeMcKenzieFiona HaslamBolleterJulian. 2022. “Federalism and Urban Primacy: Political Dimensions That Influence the City–Country Divide in Australia.”International Journal of Urban Sciences26 (3): 438–62.
44.
WilkinsonGeorgeMcKenzieFiona HaslamBolleterJulianHooperPaula. 2023. “Political Centralization, Federalism, and Urbanization: Evidence from Australia.”Social Science History47 (1): 11–39.
45.
ZimmermannAugusto. 2012. “The Still Reluctant State: Western Australia and the Conceptual Foundations of Australian Federalism.” In The Future of Australian Federalism: Comparative and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by ApplebyGabrielleAroneyNicholasJohnThomas, 75–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
