The current literature on democratic legitimacy is vital to addressing why assaults on democracy are effective. The theoretical frameworks of the construction of legitimacy by international organizations (IOs) help us comprehend how and why IOs seek support and when the results of these quests effectively curb democratic backsliding in their member states. Furthermore, the explanatory models of domestic democratic legitimacy allow us to understand how anti-democratic actors claim the right to rule and what makes their claims successful. They also explain what makes militant democracies fail. The theories differentiate between socially attributed legitimacy and the acquisition of social legitimacy through claims to the right to rule. Their conceptualizations differ depending on the audiences, claimants, and consequences of legitimacy.
BarnettM. (2021). Change in or of global governance?International Theory, 13(1), 131–143[Abstr. 71.5212].
2.
BialeE.OttonelliV. (2019). Intra-party deliberation and reflexive control within a deliberative system. Political Theory, 47(4), 500–526[Abstr. 70.468].
3.
BillerbeckS. von. (2020). “Mirror, mirror on the wall:” self-legitimation by international organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 64(1), 207–219[Abstr. 70.6865].
4.
ChungH.DugganJ. (2020). A formal theory of democratic deliberation. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 14–35[Abstr. 70.4767].
5.
CoicaudJ.-M. (2019). Political legitimacy as a personal and intellectual journey. Chinese Political Science Review, 4(4), 405–418[Abstr. 70.3105].
6.
CoicaudJ.-M. (2019). Theory of politics and political legitimacy. Chinese Political Science Review, 4(4), 434–454[Abstr. 70.3106].
7.
CorbettJ. (2020). The deconsolidation of democracy: is it new and what can be done about it?Political Studies Review, 18(2), 178–188[Abstr. 70.7451].
8.
CrilleyR.Chatterje-DoodyP. N. (2021). From Russia with lols: humour, RT, and the legitimation of Russian foreign policy. Global Society, 35(2), 269–288[Abstr. 72.2473].
9.
DellmuthL. M.TallbergJ. (2021). Elite communication and the popular legitimacy of international organizations. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1292–1313[Abstr. 71.6852].
10.
DellmuthL. (2022). The elite-citizen gap in international organization legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 283–300[Abstr. 72.3918].
11.
DukeG. (2020). Strong popular sovereignty and constitutional legitimacy. European Journal of Political Theory, 19(3), 354–374[Abstr. 71.63].
12.
ElliottM. (2020). Democratic opening and closure: struggles of (de)legitimation in the settler colony. Contemporary Political Theory, 19(1), 83–104[Abstr. 70.6293].
13.
FaudeB.Grosse-KreulF. (2020). Let’s justify! How regime complexes enhance the normative legitimacy of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 431–439[Abstr. 71.72].
14.
FioretosO.TallbergJ. (2021). Politics and theory of global governance. International Theory, 13(1), 99–111[Abstr. 71.5223].
15.
FossenT. (2019). Language and legitimacy: is pragmatist political theory fallacious?European Journal of Political Theory, 18(2), 293–305[Abstr. 69.5940].
16.
Garcia IommiL. (2021). Al-Bashir didn’t start the fire. Diversity, low contestedness, and the adoption of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 105–136[Abstr. 71.5738].
17.
HausteinerE. M. (2020). Can federations expel member states? On the political theory of expulsion. Journal of International Political Theory, 16(1), 47–67[Abstr. 70.5568].
18.
HoyeckP.-A. (2021). Religion and democracy: Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on the public use of reason. European Legacy, 26(2), 111–130[Abstr. 71.5228].
19.
IbsenM. F. (2019). The populist conjuncture: legitimation crisis in the age of globalized capitalism. Political Studies, 67(3), 795–811[Abstr. 70.134].
20.
KarkourH. L. (2021). Debating global justice with Carr: the crisis of “laissez faire” and the legitimacy problem in the twenty-first century. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(1), 81–98[Abstr. 71.3560].
21.
KelleyJ. G.SimmonsB. A. (2021). Governance by other means: rankings as regulatory systems. International Theory, 13(1), 169–178[Abstr. 71.5229].
22.
KeohaneR. O. (2021). The global politics paradigm: guide to the future or only the recent past?International Theory, 13(1), 112–121[Abstr. 71.5230].
23.
KvilvangN.KvilvangE.AlmqvistR. (2020). Making sense of complexity in governance: the case of local public management in the City of Stockholm [Sweden]. Policy Studies, 41(6), 623–640[Abstr. 71.4579].
24.
LeanderA. (2021). Locating (new) materialist characters and processes in global governance. International Theory, 13(1), 157–168[Abstr. 71.5233].
25.
MaffettoneP.UlaşL. (2019). Legitimacy, metacoordination and context-dependence. International Theory, 11(1), 81–109.
26.
MilsteinB. (2021). Justification crisis: Brexit, Trump, and deliberative breakdown. Political Theory,49(4), 554–583[Abstr. 71.7421].
27.
MinattiW.DuyvesteynI. (2020). Concepts of legitimacy: congruence and divergence in the Afghan conflict. Civil Wars, 22(1), 1–25[Abstr. 71.999].
28.
MurdochZ. (2022). Legitimacy crises and the temporal dynamics of bureaucratic representation. Governance, 35(1), 65–82[Abstr. 72.3274].
29.
PeetzJ. (2020). Legitimacy as a zero-sum game: presidential populism and the performative success of the unauthorized outsider. Contemporary Political Theory, 19(4), 642–662[Abstr. 71.4097].
30.
RossiE.ArgentonC. (2021). Property, legitimacy, ideology: a reality check. Journal of Politics, 83(3), 1046–1059[Abstr. 71.7442].
31.
ScherzA. (2021). Tying legitimacy to political power: graded legitimacy standards for international institutions. European Journal of Political Theory, 20(4), 631–653[Abstr. 72.2425].
32.
ScholteJ. A. (2021). Beyond institutionalism: toward a transformed global governance theory. International Theory, 13(1), 179–191[Abstr. 71.5244].
33.
TrojanC. (2021). Republican “Auctoritas”: Harrington’s dual theory of political legitimacy. European Journal of Political Theory, 20(3), 398–420[Abstr. 72.348].
34.
VerhaegenS.ScholteJ. A.TallbergJ. (2021). Explaining elite perceptions of legitimacy in global governance. European Journal of International Relations, 27(2), 622–650[Abstr. 71.6890].
35.
WesterwinterO. (2021). From meditation to action — a research agenda for studying informal global rule-making: remarks on ‘Cosmopolitanism, publicity, and the emergence of a “global administrative law.”‘International Theory, 13(3), 560–566[Abstr. 72.1807].
