Desire for control and the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior: Results from a pilot investigation of adults in the United Kingdom
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2022
Desire for control and the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior: Results from a pilot investigation of adults in the United Kingdom
Suicidal behavior remains a pressing problem in the United Kingdom. Continued theory development is a critical step toward designing effective prevention.
Aims:
The present study tested a novel element to suicide theory, the Desire for Control, for its direct and moderating roles within the Integrated Motivational-Volitional (IMV) Model of Suicidal Behavior.
Method:
An online-administered cross-sectional suicide risk survey study (n = 116) was conducted among adults living in the United Kingdom.
Results:
Mean suicidal ideation scores were in the non-clinical range. DOC Leadership and Destiny Control were associated with good mental health. DOC Decision Avoidance was associated with poor mental health. DOC Decision Avoidance also acted as a motivational moderator in which the entrapment-suicidal thinking link was worse among those high in decisional avoidance.
Conclusion:
DOC represents a novel, valuable addition to suicide theory and may inform suicide-specific psychotherapeutic intervention. Additional research is needed to full understand the role of DOC and its factor structures in the IMV.
AmouraC.BerjotS.GilletN.AltintasE. (2014). Desire for control, perception of control: Their impact on autonomous motivation and psychological adjustment. Motivation and Emotion, 38(3), 323–335.
2.
BauerD. J.CurranP. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373–400.
3.
BavolarJ.OrosováO. G. (2015). Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health. Judgment and Decision making, 10(1), 115–122.
4.
Branley-BellD.OconnorD. B.GreenJ. A.FergusonE.OcarrollR. E.OconnorR. C. (2019). Distinguishing suicide ideation from suicide attempts: Further test of the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behaviour. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 117, 100–107.
5.
BurgerJ. M. (1984). Desire for control, locus of control, and proneness to depression. Journal of Personality, 52(1), 71–89.
6.
BurgerJ. M. (1985). Desire for control and achievement-related behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1520–1533.
7.
BurgerJ. M.ArkinR. (1980). Prediction, control, and learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(3), 482–491.
8.
BurgerJ. M.CooperH. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 381–393.
CramerR. J.RasmussenS.TuckerR. P. (2019). An examination of the Entrapment Scale: Factor structure, correlates, and implications for suicide prevention. Psychiatry Research, 282, 112550.
12.
De BeursD.CleareS.WetherallK.Eschle-ByrneS.FergusonE.O’ConnorD. B.O’ConnorR. C. (2020). Entrapment and suicide risk: The development of the 4-item Entrapment Scale-Short Form (E-SF). Psychiatry Research, 284, 112765.
13.
DvashA.MannheimB. (2001). Technological coupling, job characteristics and operators’ well-being as moderated by desirability of control. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(3), 225-236.
14.
EndersC. K. (2017). Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data in clinical research. Behaviour Research Methods, 98, 4–18.
15.
GebhardtW. A.BrosschotJ. F. (2002). Desirability of control: Psychometric properties and relationships with locus of control, personality, coping, and mental and somatic complaints in three Dutch samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, 423–438.
16.
GilbertP.AllanS. (1998). The role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: An exploration of an evolutionary view. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 585–598.
17.
GlosterA. T.RhoadesH. M.NovyD.KlotscheJ.SeniorA.KunikM.WilsonN.StanleyM. A. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 in older primary care patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 110(3), 248–259.
18.
GriffithsA. W.WoodA. M.MaltbyJ.TaylorP. J.TaiS. (2014). The prospective role of defeat and entrapment in depression and anxiety: A 12-month longitudinal study. Psychiatry Research, 216(1), 52–59.
19.
JobesD. A. (2012). The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicide (CAMS): An evolving evidence-based approach to suicide risk. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 42, 640–653.
20.
LawlerK. A.SchmiedL. A.ArmsteadC. A.LacyJ. E. (1990). Type A behaviour, desire for control, and cardiovascular reactivity in young adult women. Journal of Social Behaviour & Personality, 5(1), 135–158.
21.
LuchtL.HöllerI.ForkmannT.TeismannT.SchönfelderA.RathD.PaashausL.StenglerK.JuckelG.GlaesmerH. (2020). Validation of the motivational phase of the integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behavior in a German high-risk sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 274, 871–879.
22.
O’ConnorR. C. (2011). Towards an integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour. In O’ ConnorR. C.PlattS.GordonJ. (Eds.), International handbook of suicide prevention: Research policy and practice (pp. 181–198). Wiley.
23.
O’ConnorR. C.KirtleyO. J. (2018). The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1754), 20170268.
OsmanA.WongJ. L.BaggeC. L.FreedenthalS.GutierrezP. M.LozanoG. (2012). The depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21): Further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(12), 1322–1328.
26.
PearlmanR. A.HsuC.StarksH.BackA. L.GordonJ. R.BharuchaA. J.KoenigB. A.BattinM. P. (2005). Motivations for physician-assisted suicide. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(3), 234–239.
PittigA.AlpersG. W.NilesA. N.CraskeM. G. (2015). Avoidant decision-making in social anxiety disorder: A laboratory task linked to in vivo anxiety and treatment outcome. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73, 96–103.
29.
Pointer-SmithA.WoodwardN.StrudlerW.WallstonK.RyeP.ZylstraM. (1988). Health care implications of desire and expectancy for control in elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 43(1), 1–7.
30.
RamseyA.EtcheverryP. (2013). Aligning task control with desire for control: Implications for performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,35(5), 467–476.
31.
RussellK.RasmussenS.HunterS. C. (2018). Insomnia and nightmares as markers of risk for suicidal ideation in young people: Investigating the role of defeat and entrapment. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 14(05), 775–784.
32.
TaylorP. J.WoodA. M.GoodingP.TarrierN. (2010). Appraisals and suicidality: The mediating role of defeat and entrapment. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 236–247.
33.
ThomasA.BuboltzW. C.TeagueS.SeemannE. A. (2011). The multidimensionality of the desirability of control scale (Burger & Cooper, 1979). Individual Differences Research, 9(3), 173–182.
34.
TuckerR. P.O’ConnorR. C.WingateL. R. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between rumination styles, hope, and suicide ideation through the lens of the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. Archives of Suicide Research, 20(4), 553–566.
35.
Van SpijkerB. A. J.BatterhamP. J.CalearA. L.FarrerL.ChristensenH.ReynoldsJ.KerkhofA. J. F. M. (2014). The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS): Community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(4), 408–419.
36.
WatanabeS.IwanagaM.OzekiY. (2002). Effects of controllability and desire for control on coping and stress responses. The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 32–40.
37.
WetherallK.RobbK. A.O’ConnorR. C. (2019). An examination of social comparison and suicide ideation through the lens of the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 49(1), 167–182.
