Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Decision-making around pregnancy is challenging for women with severe mental illness (SMI), and several clinical and socio-cultural factors might influence this process.

Aim:

The main objective of this study was to determine factors that influence decision-making regarding pregnancy for women with SMI.

Methods:

Using a qualitative design, 42 women with SMI who were pregnant or planning pregnancy were assessed using a semi-structured interview by an independent researcher not involved in their clinical care. Areas of inquiry included knowledge about their illness, treatment; family and societal beliefs on mental illness and motherhood; illness management; and attitude towards medical advice.

Results:

Among the 42 women, majority of the women (88%) reported reduced autonomy in decision-making related to pregnancy. Stigma was one of the major contributory factors in decision-making. Over 80% reported not using contraception despite medical advice due to lack of control over the decisions related to the use of contraception. Over 50% of the women in the study believed that taking psychotropic medications during pregnancy would definitely harm the baby. A similar number believed that their illness would not recur if medications were to be stopped during pregnancy.

Conclusion:

Women with SMI who plan to become pregnant, especially from low-income settings in India, are disadvantaged by stigma and societal expectations, affecting their ability to make optimum decisions during this crucial period. Decision-making around pregnancy in women with SMI is complex and appears to be influenced by several socio-cultural factors and needs to be dealt with sensitively.

Keywords

Decision-making severe mental illness pregnancy contraception patriarchy gender preference India

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrighetti

H. J.

Semaka

Austin

J. C.

(2017). Women’s experiences of participating in a prospective, longitudinal postpartum depression study: Insights for perinatal mental health researchers. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 20(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0744-7

Desai

Chandra

P. S.

(2009). Ethical issues in treating pregnant women with severe mental illness. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 6(2), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2009.025

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology Press. https://vufind.carli.illinois.edu/vf-uiu/Record/uiu_3480467/Cite

Hammarberg

Kirkman

de Lacey

(2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334

Hodgson

E. J.

Collier

Hayes

Curry

L. A.

Fraenkel

(2013). Family planning and contraceptive decision-making by economically disadvantaged, African-American women. Contraception, 88(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.011

Jejeebhoy

S. J.

Santhya

K. G.

Acharya

Prakash

(2013). Marriage-related decision-making and young women’s marital relations and agency. Asian Population Studies, 9(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2012.736699

Malek

(2017). Maternal decision-making during pregnancy: Parental obligations and cultural differences. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 43, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.02.002

Mistry

Galal

(2009). Women’s autonomy and pregnancy care in rural India: A contextual analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 69(6), 926–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.008

Patel

S. R.

Wisner

K. L.

(2011). Decision making for depression treatment during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Depression and Anxiety, 28(7), 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20844

10.

Senarath

Gunawardena

N. S.

(2009). Women’s autonomy in decision making for health care in South Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539509331590

11.

Sharma

Pandit

Pathak

Sharma

(2013). Hinduism, marriage and mental illness. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(Suppl. 2), S243–S249. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.105544

12.

Somen Saha

S. S

. (2005). OJHAS: 2005-2-5 Saha S. Dynamics governing women’s decision on reproductive health matters – Reflections from a qualitative study in Central India. https://www.ojhas.org/issue14/2005-2-5.htm

13.

Srivastava

(2013). Marriage as a perceived panacea to mental illness in India: Reality check. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(Suppl. 2), S239–S242. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.105542

14.

Thara

Srinivasan

T. N.

(2000). How stigmatizing is schizophrenia in India? International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 46(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076400004600206

15.

Vigod

Hussain-Shamsy

Grigoriadis

Howard

L. M.

Metcalfe

Oberlander

T. F.

Schram

Stewart

D. E.

Taylor

V. H.

Dennis

C.-L.

(2016). A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17(1), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1233-4

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Factors influencing decision-making around pregnancy among women with severe mental illness (SMI): A qualitative study