Development and validation of the Vellore Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale to assess functioning in people with mental illness

Abstract

Background:

Available occupational therapy assessment scales focus on specific areas of functioning. There is a need for comprehensive evaluation of diverse aspects of functioning in people with mental illness.

Aim:

To develop a comprehensive assessment scale to evaluate diverse aspects of functioning among people with mental illness and to assess its validity and reliability.

Methods:

Available instruments, which evaluate diverse aspects of functioning in people with mental illness, were retrieved. Relevant items, which evaluate specific functions, were selected by a committee of mental health experts and combined to form a comprehensive instrument. Face and content validity and feasibility were assessed and the new instrument was piloted among 60 patients with mental illness. The final version of the instrument was employed in 151 consecutive clients, between 18 and 60 years of age, who were also assessed using Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS), Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ), Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES) and Pai and Kapur Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS) by two therapists. The inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability of the new instrument (Vellore Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale (VOTES)) were also evaluated.

Results:

The new scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .817), inter-rater reliability .928 (.877–.958) and test–retest reliability .928 (.868–.961). The correlation between the general behaviour domain (Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient [PCC] = −.763, p = .000), task behaviour (PCC = −.829, p = .000), social skills (PCC = −.351, p = .000), intrapersonal skills (PCC = −.208, p = .010), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) (PCC = −.329, p = .038) and leisure activities (PCC = −.433, p = .005) scores of VOTES with the corresponding domains in the scales used for comparison was statistically significant. The correlation between the total score of VOTES and the total scores of OTTOS, SFQ and RSES was also statistically significant suggesting convergent validity. The correlation between the total score of VOTES with the total score of FBI is not statistically significant, implying good divergent validity.

Conclusion:

VOTES seems to be a promising tool to assess overall functioning of people with mental illness.

Keywords

Occupational therapy assessment functioning mental illness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

D’Souza

D. D.

(2012). Problem identification grid: Assessment tool for acute mental health settings. Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 11–14.

Baum

C. M.

Connor

L. T.

Morrison

Hahn

Dromerick

A. W.

Edwards

D. F.

(2008). Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Executive Function Performance Test: A measure of executive function in a sample of people with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 446–455.

Birchwood

Smith

Cochrane

Wetton

Copestake

(1990). The Social Functioning Scale: The development and validation of a new scale of social adjustment for use in family intervention programmes with schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 853–859.

Brayman

S. J.

Kirby

T. F.

Meisenheimer

A. M.

Short

M. J.

(1976).The Comprehensive Occupational Evaluation Scale. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30, 94–100.

Cieza

Anczewska

Ayuso-Mateos

J. L.

Baker

Bickenbach

Chatterji

… Pitkänen

(2015). Understanding the impact of brain disorders: Towards a ‘horizontal epidemiology’ of psychosocial difficulties and their determinants. PLoS ONE, 10, e0136271.

Forsyth

Lai

Kielhofner

(1999). The Assessment of Communication and Interaction Skills (ACIS): Measurement of psychometric properties. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 69–74.

Hall

R. C.

(1995).Global assessment of functioning, a modified scale. Psychosomatics, 36, 267–269.

Heimann

N. E.

Allen

C. K.

Yerxa

E. J.

(1989). The Routine Task Inventory: A tool for describing the function behavior of the cognitively disabled. Occupational Therapy Practice, 1, 67–74.

Hemphill

P. B.

(2008). Assessments in occupational therapy mental health – An integrative approach (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.

10.

Houston

Williams

S. L.

Bloomer

Mann

W. C.

(1989). The Bay Area Functional Performance Evaluation: Development and standardization. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 170–183.

11.

Law

Baptiste

McColl

Opzoomer

Polatajko

Pollock

(1990).The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 82–87.

12.

Lawton

M. P.

Brody

E. M.

(1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.

13.

Leonardelli

C. A.

(1986).The process of developing a quantifiable evaluation of daily living skills in psychiatry. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 6, 17–26.

14.

Margolis

R. L.

Harrison

S. A.

Robinson

H. J.

Jayaram

(1996). Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS): A rapid method for rating task group function of psychiatric patients. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 380–385.

15.

Mimura

Griffiths

(2007). A Japanese version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and equivalence assessment. Journal of Psychosomatics Research, 62, 589–594.

16.

Oakley

Kielhofner

Barris

Reichler

R. K.

(1986). The Role Checklist: Development and empirical assessment of reliability. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 6, 157–170.

17.

Pai

Kapur

R. L.

(1981). The burden on the family of a psychiatric patient: Development of an interview schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 332–334.

18.

Rogers

J. C.

Weinstein

J. M.

Figone

J. J.

(1978). The Interest Check List: An empirical assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32, 628–630.

19.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

20.

Sabariego

Coenen

Ballert

Cabello

Leonardi

Anczewska

… Cieza

(2015). Determinants of psychosocial difficulties experienced by persons with brain disorders: Towards a ‘horizontal epidemiology’ approach. PLoS ONE, 10, e0141322. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141322

21.

Saleem

Olié

J. P.

Loo

(2002). Social functioning and quality of life in the schizophrenic patient: Advantages of amisulpride. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17, 1–8.

22.

Tyrer

Nur

Crawford

(2005). The Social Functioning Questionnaire: A rapid and robust measure of perceived functioning. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 51, 265–275.

23.

Watts

J. H.

Kielhofner

Bauer

D. F.

Gregory

M. D.

Valentine

D. B.

(1986). The Assessment of Occupational Functioning: A screening tool for use in long-term care. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 231–240.