Background: Concerning diagnostics of mental disorders, increasing time and cost pressure in the clinical practice often requires an ad hoc and intuitive holistic examination of the patient’s clinical presentation instead of the application of standardized diagnostic instruments. This study examined whether attributes of mental healthcare professionals (professional training, clinical experience, socio-demographic variables) affect their implicit weighing of symptoms they encounter in such unstandardized diagnostic situations.
Methods: Twenty psychiatrists and 28 clinical psychologists rated the relevance of 241 items for the diagnosis of a depressive episode. Items referred to the nine A-criteria of DSM-IV and associated features. Intraclass correlations (ICC), regression analysis and t-tests were calculated.
Results: Clinicians agreed largely in their relevance judgements on the different items ( ICC = 0.97, F183,8784 = 44.29, p < 0.001). Stepwise regression analyses with profession, clinical experience, age and gender as predictors for each DSM-IV A-criterion revealed no significant β-coefficient except for one: ‘profession’ was a significant predictor for the mean relevance judgement on items that could not be assigned to an A-criterion. This effect turned out to be caused by only one item (obsessive-compulsive behaviour).
Conclusions: Clinical experts agree highly in their implicit weighing of depression symptoms regardless of their age, gender, clinical experience and professional training.
Abdel-Khalek, A.M. ( 2004) Can somatic symptoms predict depression? Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 657-666.
2.
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. DSM-IV . Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3.
Berg, M. ( 1986) Toward a diagnostic alliance between psychiatrist and psychologist. The American Psychologist, 41, 52-59.
4.
Brammer, R. ( 2002) Effects of experience and training on diagnostic accuracy . Psychological Assessment, 14, 110-113.
5.
Galanter, C.A. & Patel, V.L. ( 2005) Medical decision making: A selective review for child psychiatrists and psychologists. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 675-689.
6.
Garb, H.N. ( 1998) Studying the clinician: Judgement research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
Kahneman, D. ( 2003) A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. The American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
8.
Kingsbury, S.J. ( 1987) Cognitive differences between clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. The American Psychologist, 42, 152-156.
9.
MacMahon, K.M. & Lip, G.Y. ( 2002) Psychological factors in heart failure: A review of the literature. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 509-516.
10.
McGraw, K.O. & Wong, S.P. ( 1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients . Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.
11.
Pingitore, D.P., Scheffler, R.M., Sentell, T. & West, J.C. ( 2002) Comparison of psychiatrists and psychologists in clinical practice. Psychiatric Services, 53, 977-983.
12.
Sedlmeier, P. ( 2005) From associations to intuitive judgement and decision making: Implicitly learning from experience. In The Routines of Decision Making (eds. T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Simon, G.E., VonKorff, M., Piccinelli, M., Fullerton, C. & Ormel, J. ( 1999) An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. The New England Journal of Medicine , 341, 1329-1335.
14.
Wittchen, H.U. & Jacobi, F. ( 2005) Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe - A critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. European Neuropsychopharmacology: The Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 15, 357-376.
15.
Witteman, C.L.M. & van den Bercken, J.H.L. ( 2007) Intermediate effects in psychodiagnostic classification . European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 56-61.
16.
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
