The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been spreading around the world, causing a major public health crisis that has already claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. Street-level bureaucrats—health workers, teachers, street cleaners, police officers, and so forth—are at the forefront in fighting against the pandemic. Of these, public health care workers, due to the nature of their involvement, should know and understand why they are risking their lives to save others during this pandemic. Based on the preliminary data gleaned from interviews with public health care workers in Bangladesh and Egypt, this ongoing research suggests they are risking their lives for reasons such as altruistic behavior, service to profession, adherence to bureaucratic accountability, and a desire to help mankind. The findings contribute to the existing literature about street-level bureaucratic behavior in atypical times such as these of the pandemic. This study is unique in that it comprehends that public health care workers of two culturally and geographically distinct countries are risking their lives for the same public-spirited cause.
AyubiNNM. Bureaucratic inflation and administrative inefficiency: the deadlock in Egyptian administration. Middle East Stud. 1982;18(3):286–299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4282894
2.
HattkeFHenselDKaluczaJ. Emotional response to bureaucratic red tape. Public Adm Rev. 2020;80(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/pura.13116
3.
PeetersRJiménezHTO’ConnerERojasPOGalindoMGTenorioDM. Low-trust bureaucracy: understanding the Mexican bureaucratic experience. Public Adm Dev. 2018;38(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1824
4.
HuqueASRahmanMT. From domination to alliance: shifting strategies and accumulation of power by the bureaucracy in Bangladesh. Public Organization Review. 2003;3(4):403–418. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000004817.33343.a5
5.
PetersBG. Still the century of bureaucracy? The roles of public servants. Public Policy and Administration (VIEŠOJI POLITIKA IR ADMINISTRAVIMAS). 2009;30:7–21.
6.
HupeP. Contextualizing government in action. In: HupeP, ed. Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Ground Floor of Government Context. Edward Elgar; 2019:2–14.
BrodkinEZ. Accountability in street-level organizations. International Journal of Public Administration. 2008;31(3):317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590587
GassnerDGofenA. Street-level management: a clientele-agent perspective on implementation. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2018;28(4):551–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy051
11.
LipskyM. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation; 1980.
12.
CohenNHertzU. Street-level bureaucrats’ social value orientation on and off duty. Public Adm Rev. 2020;80(3):442–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13190
13.
Maynard-MoodySMushenoM. Social equities and inequities in practice: street-level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Adm Rev. 2012;72:s16–s23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02633.x
14.
SchusterMWeitzmanLMikkelsenKS, et al.Responding to COVID-19 through surveys of public servants. Public Adm Rev. 2020;80(5):792–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/pura.13246
15.
YinRK. Case study research design and methods. 3rd edn. Sage; 2003;79.
16.
SchrammW. Notes on case studies of instructional media projects. Working paper for the Academy of Educational Development. 1971. Washington, DC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED092145
17.
GerickeCABritainKElmahdawyMElsisiG. Health system in Egypt. In: van GinnekenEBusseR, eds. Health care systems and policies. Springer; 2018:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6419-8_7-2
18.
OsmanFABennettS. Political economy and quality of primary health service in rural Bangladesh and the United States of America: a comparative analysis. J Int Dev. 2018;30(5):818–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3343
19.
HassanMKSarkerAE. Managerial innovations in the Egyptian health sector: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Public Administration. 2012;35(11):760–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.684142
20.
OsmanFA. Health policy, programmes and systems in Bangladesh: achievements and challenges. South Asian Survey. 2008;15(2):263–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152310801500206
MandelDRLittA. The ultimate sacrifice: perceived peer honor predicts troops’ willingness to risk their lives. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2013;16(3):375–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461961
23.
CohenNGolan-NadirN. Why do street-level bureaucrats risk themselves for others? The case of Israeli police officers. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2020:480–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12417
24.
ErasmusE. The use of street-level bureaucracy theory in health policy analysis in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-ethnographic synthesis. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29:iii70–iii78. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu112
25.
FinlaySSandallJ. “Someone's rooting for you”: continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1228–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.029
26.
BekkersRWiepkingP. A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: eight mechanisms that drives charitable giving. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2011;40(5):924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
27.
AhmedYRamadanRSakrMF. Equity of health care financing: a progressivity analysis for Egypt. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021;3(1):3–24. https://doi.org/10.1018/JHASS-08-2019-0040
FahimSMBhuayanTAHassanMZ,et al.Financing healthcare in Bangladesh: policy responses and challenges towards achieving health coverage. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2019;34(1):e11–e20. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2666
LaveeE. Who is in charge? The provision of informal personal resources at the street level. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2021;31(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa025
38.
ZackaB. When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2017.
