AshitKDMohamedEVandnaD, et al. An efficient hierarchical clustering protocol for multihop internet of vehicles communication. Transac Emerg Telecommun Technol . Epub ahead of print 2019.. DOI: 10.1002/ett.3690.
2.
LakshmanaprabuSKMohamedEShankarK.Optimal tuning of decentralized fractional order PID controllers for TITO process using equivalent transfer function. Cogn Syst Res2019;
58: 292–303.
3.
Sang HunLKwang SeopSWondeaJ, et al.
Risk assessment of safety data link and network communication in digital safety feature control system of nuclear power plant. Ann Nucl Energy2017;
108: 394–405.
4.
QiuGZuniga-MontanezRLawY, et al.
Polyphosphate-accumulating organisms in full-scale tropical wastewater treatment plants use diverse carbon sources. Water Res2019;
149: 496–510.
5.
Alfaro-AcoRThawaniAPetryS.Structural analysis of the role of TPX2 in branching microtubule nucleation. J Cell Biol2017;
216: 983–997.
6.
AydogmusO.A web-based educational tool using programmable logic controller-connected MATLAB-OPC server. Int J Electric Eng Educ2015;
52: 71–80.
7.
LiHChenGHuangT, et al.
Event-triggered distributed average consensus over directed digital networks with limited communication bandwidth. IEEE Transac Cybernet2016;
46: 3098–3110.
8.
XiongWYuXChenY, et al.
Quantized iterative learning consensus tracking of digital networks with limited information communication. IEEE Transac Neural Netw Learn Syst2017;
28: 1473–1480.
9.
CevallosYMolinaLSantillánA, et al.
A digital communication analysis of gene expression of proteins in biological systems: a layered network model view. Cogn Comput2017;
9: 43–67.
10.
LiHChenGHuangT, et al.
High-performance consensus control in networked systems with limited bandwidth communication and time-varying directed topologies. IEEE Transac Neural Netw Learn Syst2017;
28: 1043–1012.
11.
ChenXLiaoXGaoL, et al.
Event-triggered consensus for multi-agent networks with switching topology under quantized communication. Neurocomputing2017;
230: 294–301.
12.
PauMVelascoMEnricXM.Performance evaluation of secondary control policies with respect to digital communications properties in inverter-based islanded microgrids. IEEE Transac Smart Grid2018;
9: 2192–2202.
13.
WuYMengWYanZ, et al.
Editorial: special issue on blockchain and communication networks. Digital Commun Netw2020;
6: 145–146.
14.
AkbarBHojjatollahN.Promotion of environmental education through facilitated field study approach – a teaching model for development of conservation attitude. J Ind Relat2017;
46: 383–384.
15.
VenetsanouFKambasA.Physical activity promotion in Greek preschools: the gap between theory and practice. Early Childhood Educ J2017;
45: 437–444.
16.
NaborsLWelkerKLangM, et al.
Teaching children about healthy eating and exercise during summer camp. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance2017;
88: 58–60.
17.
VodstrcilLATwinJGarlandSM, et al.
The influence of sexual activity on the vaginal microbiota and Gardnerella vaginalis clade diversity in young women. PLoS One2017;
12: e0171856.
18.
SebastianPJanLFabianJ.From structural analysis to observer–based residual generation for fault detection.Int J Appl Math Comput Sci2018;
28: 233–245.
19.
BoothPNLawSAMaJ, et al.
Modeling aesthetics to support an ecosystem services approach for natural resource management decision making. Integrat Environ Assess Manage2017;
13: 926–938.
20.
ZhangJYaoHRizzoniG.Fault diagnosis for electric drive systems of electrified vehicles based on structural analysis. IEEE Transac Vehic Technol2017;
66: 1027–1039.
21.
HoffmanHRiceCSkordalakesE.Structural analysis reveals the deleterious effects of telomerase mutations in bone marrow failure syndromes. J Biol Chem2017;
292: 4593–4601.
22.
GomathiVSrinivasanSRamkumarK, et al.
Structural analysis based sensor measurement fault diagnosis in cement industries. Control Eng Pract2017;
64: 148–159.
23.
TurkanYRadkowskiRKarabulut-IlguA, et al.
Mobile augmented reality for teaching structural analysis. Adv Eng Inform2017;
34: 90–100.
24.
LalliDIdsoMNAndreasLB, et al.
Proton-based structural analysis of a heptahelical transmembrane protein in lipid bilayers. J Am Chem Soc2017;
139: 13006–13012.
25.
GerlitsOKeenDABlakeleyMP, et al.
Room temperature neutron crystallography of drug resistant HIV-1 protease uncovers limitations of X-ray structural analysis at 100K. J Med Chem2017;
60: 2018–2025.
26.
GustmanALSteinmeierTLTabatabaiN.A structural analysis of the effects of the great recession on retirement and working longer by members of two-earner households. J Econ Age2018;
12: 175–182.
27.
WagnerAHimmelHJ.aRMSD: a comprehensive tool for structural analysis. J Chem Inform Model2017;
57: 428–438.
28.
AbsolomKHolchPAmirZ.Introduction to special section on digital technology and cancer survivorship. J Cancer Survivorship2017;
11: 655–653.
29.
IivariNKinnulaMMolin-JuustilaT, et al.
Exclusions in social inclusion projects: struggles in involving children in digital technology development. Inform Syst J2018;
28: 1020–1048.
30.
PerakslisED.Strategies for delivering value from digital technology transformation. Nat Rev Drug Discov2017;
16: 71–72.
31.
LvZHuBLvH.Infrastructure monitoring and operation for smart cities based on IoT system. IEEE Transac Ind Inform2020;
16: 1957–1962.
