Vimal BabuURamakrishnaMNagamaniM. Review on Utilization of Nanomaterials and polymers in fruit Ripening, food packing and its hazards to human health. 2015.
2.
Vimal BabuUNaga ManiMRama KrishnaM.Review on the detection of adulteration in fuels though computational techniques. Mater Today Proc2017;
4: 1723–1729.
3.
HuangJXingC-CShinSY, et al. Optimizing M2M communications and quality of services in the IoT for sustainable smart cities. Vol, 3, 2018, pp.4–15.
4.
NiPWangXWangZ, et al. Numerical modeling of soot and NOx emissions of a diesel/methanol dual fuel engine. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring, Changsha, 2011, pp. 483--486, doi: 10.1109/CDCIEM.2011.164.
5.
XinguangLJianguoY. Research on NOx emissions of the engine fueled with M15. In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, Changsha, 2010, pp. 49--52, doi: 10.1109/ICICTA.2010.729.
6.
SarafRRThipseSSSaxenaPK. Lambda characterization of diesel-cng dual fuel engine. In: 2009 Second International Conference on Environmental and Computer Science, Dubai, 2009, pp. 170--174, doi: 10.1109/ICECS.2009.29.
7.
IllianoVPMunoz-GonzalezLLupuEC. Don’t fool me!: detection, characterisation and diagnosis of spoofed and masked events in wireless sensor networks. Vol. 14, 2017, pp.279–293.
8.
MulellerCJCannellaWKalghataG. Fuel for engines and impart of fuel composition engine performance. 2014.
9.
KumarRLagetOPillaG, et al. CFD simulation to understand auto-ignition characteristics of dual fuel strategies using high- and low-octane fuels: a step towards the octane-on-demand engine. SAE Int2017.
WagnerIZhaoY. On the strength of privacy metrics for vehicular communication. In: Ieee T Mobile Comput 2019; Vol. 18, 2019, pp.390–403.
12.
Vimal BabuURamakrishnaMNagamaniM, et. al.
Detection of fuel adulteration through Multivariate Analysis using Python Programming IOSR.J Comput Eng2018;
20: 23–26.
13.
CerriTD’ErricoGOnoratiA.Experimental investigations on high octane number gasoline formulations for internal combustion engines. Fuel2013;
111: 305–315.
14.
JafariMRafieiRAmiriS, et al.
Combining continuous catalytic regenerative naphtha reformer with thermally coupled concept for improving the process yield. Int J Hydrogen Energy2013;
38: 10327–10344.
15.
SaeediRIranshahiD.Multi-objective optimization of thermally coupled reactor of CCR naphtha reforming in presence of SO2 oxidation to boost the gasoline octane number and hydrogen. Fuel2017;
206: 580–592.
16.
VallinayagamRVedharajSNaserN, et al.
Terpineol as a novel octane booster for extending the knock limit of Gasoline. Fuel2017;
187: 9–15.
17.
ElsayedHAMenoufyMFShabanSA, et al. Optimization of the reaction parameters of heavy naphtha reforming process using Pt-Re/Al2O3 catalyst system. Egypt J Pet 2017; 26: 885--893
18.
RankovicNBourhisGLoosM, et al.
Understanding octane number evolution for enabling alternative low RON refinery streams and octane boosters as transportation fuels. Fuel2015;
150: 41–47.
19.
SaeediRIranshahiD.Hydrogen and aromatic production by means of a novel membrane integrated cross flow CCR naphtha reforming process. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017;
42: 7957–7973.
20.
HanW-QYaoC-D.Research on high cetane and high octane number fuels and the mechanism for their common oxidation and auto-ignition. Fuel2015;
150: 29–40.
21.
Miguel Rodríguez-AntónLHernández-CamposMSanz-PérezF.Experimental determination of some physical properties of gasoline, ethanol and ETBE blends. Fuel2013;
112: 178–184.
22.
Vimal BabuURamakrishnaMNagamaniM, et al. Modeling with Multilayer perceptron for Detecton fuel adulteration using python programming. Jour of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems 2018; 10: 6.
23.
MendesGBarbeiraPJS.Detection and quantification of adulterants in gasoline using distillation curves and multivariate methods. Fuel2013;
112: 163–171.
24.
LiuHWangZLongY, et al.
Comparative study on alcohol–gasoline and gasoline–alcohol Dual-Fuel Spark Ignition (DFSI) combustion for engine particle number (PN) reduction. Fuel2015;
159: 250–258.
25.
LiYMengLNithyanandanK, et al.
Combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of a spark-ignition engine fueled with isopropanol-n-butanol-ethanol and gasoline blends. Fuel2016;
184: 864–872.
26.
ZhangZWangTJiaM, et al.
Combustion and particle number emissions of a direct injection spark ignition engine operating on ethanol/gasoline and n-butanol/gasoline blends with exhaust gas recirculation. Fuel2014;
130: 177–188.
27.
FournierSSimonGSeersP.Evaluation of low concentrations of ethanol, butanol, BE, and ABE blended with gasoline in a direct-injection, spark-ignition engine. Fuel2016;
181: 396–407.
28.
ElfasakhanyA.Performance and emissions of spark-ignition engine using ethanol–methanol–gasoline, n-butanol–iso-butanol–gasoline and iso-butanol–ethanol–gasoline blends: a comparative study. Eng Sci Technol2016;
19: 2053–2059.
29.
LiuHWangZLongY, et al.
Dual-Fuel Spark Ignition (DFSI) combustion fuelled with different alcohols and gasoline for fuel efficiency. Fuel2015;
157: 255–260.
30.
da SilvaMPFRodrigues e BritoLHonoratoFA, et al.
Classification of gasoline as with or without dispersant and detergent additives using infrared spectroscopy and multivariate classification. Fuel2014;
116: 151–157.
31.
Xu S and Wang C. Intelligent computation technology and automation. In: International conference on study on vehicle fuel evaporative emissions test system, Vol. 3, 2009, pp.799--802.
32.
SakaiSRothamerD.Effect of ethanol blending on particulate formation from premixed combustion in spark-ignition engines. Fuel2017;
196: 154–168.
33.
MendesGAlemeHGBarbeiraPJS.Reid vapor pressure prediction of automotive gasoline using distillation curves and multivariate calibration. Fuel2017;
187: 167–172.
34.
ElfasakhanyA.Experimental study of dual n-butanol and iso-butanol additives on spark-ignition engine performance and emissions. Fuel2016;
163: 166–174.
35.
Vimal BabuUNaga ManiMRama KrishnaM, et al.
Data preprocessing for modelling the adulteration detection in gasoline with BIS. Mater Today Proc2018;
5: 4637–4645.
36.
LehmannAGrossA. Towards Vehicle Emission Estimation from Smartphone Sensors. In: 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM) towards vehicle emission estimation from smartphone sensors, Daejeon, Vol. 1, 2017, pp.154–163. doi: 10.1109/MDM.2017.29.
37.
HaoYYuLSongG, et al. PEMS-based multi-level analysis of fuel consumption and emissions for heavy-duty diesel vehicles. In: 2009 International Conference on Energy and Environment Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, 2009, pp. 233--239, doi: 10.1109/ICEET.2009.63.
