A low-cost real-time two-dimensional PC-based ball tracking and control laboratory system is developed to teach real-time control system development with a real physical system instead of computer simulation. The system can be used for a single-student or a two-student competition for the best control algorithm. Training can be given on pattern recognition, modelling, stepper motor control, control strategies and other aspects.
StankovicJA. Strategic directions in real-time and embedded systems. ACM Comput Surv1996; 28: 751–763.
2.
WareRHFulkerDWSteinSA. SuomiNet: a real–time national GPS network for atmospheric research and education. Bull Am Meteorol Soc2000; 81: 677–694.
3.
ThrontonRKSokoloffDR. Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. Am J Phys Teach1990; 58: 858–867.
4.
AlbuMMHolbertKEHeydtGT. Embedding remote experimentation in power engineering education. IEEE Trans Power Syst2004; 19: 139–143.
5.
BernhardJ. Improving engineering physics teaching-learning from physics education research. In: Proc PTEEBudapest, 13--17 June 200013–17. Sweden: Linköping University.
6.
Moreno-GerPTorrenteJBustamanteJ. Application of a low-cost web-based simulation to improve students’ practical skills in medical education. Int J Med Inform2010; 79: 459–467.
7.
JimoyiannisAKomisV. Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: a case study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion. Comput Educ2001; 36: 183–204.
8.
BozkurtEIlikA. The effect of computer simulations over students’ beliefs on physics and physics success. Procedia-Social Behav Sci2010; 2: 4587–4591.
9.
Fujii N and Koike N. A new remote laboratory for hardware experiment with shared resources and service management. In: Proceedings third international conference on information technology and applications (ICITA’05), 2005, pp.153–158. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
10.
WangYPapageorgiouM. Real-time freeway traffic state estimation based on extended Kalman filter: a general approach. Transp Res Part B Methodol2005; 39: 141–167.
11.
Beymer D, McLauchlan P, Coifman B, et al. A real-time computer vision system for measuring traffic parameters. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 17–19 June 1997, pp.495–501. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
12.
CoifmanB. A real-time computer vision system for vehicle tracking and traffic surveillance. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol1998; 6: 271–288.
13.
Brock O, Khatib O and Viji S. Task-consistent obstacle avoidance and motion behavior for mobile manipulation. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Washington, D.C, 11--15 May 2002, pp.388–393. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
14.
VannoyJXiaoJ. Real-time adaptive motion planning (RAMP) of mobile manipulators in dynamic environments with unforeseen changes. IEEE Trans Robot2008; 24: 1199–1212.
15.
Vasquez D, Large F, Fraichard T, et al. High-speed autonomous navigation with motion prediction for unknown moving obstacles. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 28 September–2 October 2004, pp.82–87. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
16.
Davison AJ. Real-time simultaneous localisation and mapping with a single camera. In: Proceedings 9th IEEE international conference on computer vision, Nice, France, 13--16 October 2003, vol. 2, pp.1403–1410.
17.
ShiratoHShimizuSKuniedaT. Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2000; 48: 1187–1195.
18.
SeppenwooldeYShiratoHKitamuraK. Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2002; 53: 822–834.
19.
OnimaruRFujinoMYamazakiK. Steep dose-response relationship for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer using hypofractionated high-dose irradiation by real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2008; 70: 374–381.
20.
RenJOrwellJJonesG. Real-time 3D soccer ball tracking from multiple cameras. In: Proc British Machine Vision Conf, London, 7--9 September2004, pp. 829–838. London: BMVA Press.
21.
D’Orazio T, Ancona N, Cicirelli G, et al. A ball detection algorithm for real soccer image sequences. In: Proceedings 16th international conference on pattern recognition, Quebec, Canada, 11–15 August 2002, pp.210–213. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
22.
RenJOrwellJJonesGA. Real-time modeling of 3-D soccer ball trajectories from multiple fixed cameras. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol2008; 18: 350–362.
23.
VoigtländerALangeSLauerM. Real-time 3D ball recognition using perspective and catadioptric cameras. In: Proceedings European Conf on Mobile Robots (ECMR07), Freiburg, Germany,2007, pp. 1–6.
24.
TabiiYThamiROH. A framework for soccer video processing and analysis based on enhanced algorithm for dominant color extraction. Int J Image Process2009; 3: 131.
25.
Pingali GS, Jean YD and Carlbom I. Real time tracking for enhanced tennis broadcasts. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1998, pp.260–265.
26.
Pingali G, Opalach A and Jean Y. Ball tracking and virtual replays for innovative tennis broadcasts. In: Proceedings 15th international conference on pattern recognition, 2000, vol. 4, pp.152–156.
27.
Rusdorf S and Brunnett G. Real time tracking of high speed movements in the context of a table tennis application. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology - VRST ’05, 2005, pp.192–201.
28.
AsadaM. RoboCup: today and tomorrow – what we have learned. Artif Intell1999; 110: 193–214.
29.
ErdemH. Application of neuro-fuzzy controller for sumo robot control. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38: 9752–9760.
30.
Weinberg JB, Engel GL, Gu K, et al. A multidisciplinary model for using robotics in engineering education. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE annual conference and exposition, 2001. New York, NY: ASEE.
31.
BezdekJCKellerJKrisnapuramR. Fuzzy models and algorithms for pattern recognition and image processing, New York, NY: Springer, 2006.
