One of the key sociological aspects of the transformation of Central and Eastern Europe after communism was a shift from collectivistic to individualistic orientations. This article observes trends in individualism, operationalized as self-orientation, in Poland and Germany, with the latter further dissected into western and eastern part of the country. While western Germany was originally contrasted with former communist countries in this respect, a growing and stable convergence was later generally assumed. This is verified in the form of a lagged comparison between two birth cohorts, one that reached adulthood in the late 1980s and another born at that time. Data from the German Socio-Economic Panel along with two complementary Polish surveys are used in the analysis. The results show no presumed linear convergence in individualism and instead a consistent “post-individualistic” turn led by western Germany. This trend is less pronounced in women as there seem to be counterbalancing processes at play.
AlemánJWoodsD (2015) Value orientations from the World Values Survey. Comparative Political Studies49(8): 1039–1067.
2.
AlesinaAFuchs-SchündelnN (2007) Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. American Economic Review97(4): 1507–1528.
3.
AminiCDouarinEHinksT (2022) Individualism and attitudes towards reporting corruption: Evidence from post-communist economies. Journal of Institutional Economics18: 85–100.
4.
BakkeESitterN (2020) The EU’s enfants terribles: Democratic backsliding in Central Europe since 2010. Perspectives on Politics20(1): 22–37.
5.
BauernschusterSRainerH (2012) Political regimes and the family: How sex-role attitudes continue to differ in reunified Germany. Journal of Population Economics25: 5–27.
6.
BeckerRBlossfeldHP (2017) Entry of men into the labour market in West Germany and their career mobility (1945–2008): A long-term longitudinal analysis identifying cohort, period, and life-course effects. Journal for Labour Market Research50: 113–130.
7.
BeckerRMayerKU (2019) Societal change and educational trajectories of women and men born between 1919 and 1986 in (West) Germany. European Sociological Review35(2): 147–168.
8.
BernhardM (2021) Democratic backsliding in Poland and Hungary. Slavic Review80(3): 585–607.
9.
BeugelsdijkSWelzelC (2018) Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology49(10): 1469–1505.
10.
BoerDHankeKHeJ (2018) On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology49(5): 713–734.
11.
BreitsohlHRuhleS (2012) Differences in work-related attitudes between millennials and generation X: Evidence from Germany. In: NgELyonsSSchweizerL (eds) Managing the New Workforce: International Perspectives on the Millennial Generation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 107–129.
12.
CabralRCastellanos-SosaFA (2019) Europe’s income convergence and the latest global financial crisis. Research in Economics73(1): 23–34.
13.
CavalliA (2004) Generations and value orientations. Social Compass51(2): 155–168.
14.
CebullaA (2011) A convergence of attitudes? Perceptions of social inequality and work in post-communist and “traditional” European market economies. Sozialer Fortschritt3: 43–50.
15.
CieciuchJDavidovESchmidtP, et al (2018) How to obtain comparable measures for cross-national comparisons. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie and Sozialpsychologie71: 157–186.
16.
DavidovESchmidtPSchwartzSH (2008) Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly72(3): 420–445.
17.
DomańskiH ([1996] 2000) On the Verge of Convergence. Budapest: Central European University Press.
18.
DomańskiHDukaczewskaA (1995) Is individualism in Poland still alive?Social Science Information34(3): 389–412.
EisenstadtSN (1977) Convergence and divergence of modern and modernizing societies: Indications from the analysis of the structuring of social hierarchies in Middle Eastern Societies. International Journal of Middle East Studies8(1): 1–27.
21.
Eurofound (2021) Monitoring Convergence in the European Union: Looking Backwards to Move Forward—Upward Convergence Through Crises (Challenges and Prospects in the EU Series). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
22.
EyermanRTurnerBS (1998) Outline of a theory of generations. European Journal of Social Theory1: 191–106.
23.
FischerCS (2011) Still Connected: Family and Friends in America since 1970. New York: Russel Sage.
24.
FormW (1979) Comparative industrial sociology and the convergence hypothesis. Annual Review of Sociology5(1): 1–25.
25.
FukuyamaF (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
26.
FurlongAGoodwinJO’ConnorH, et al (2017) Young People in the Labour Market: Past, Present, Future. London: Routledge.
27.
GalorO (1996) Convergence? Inferences from theoretical models. Economic Journal106(437): 1056–1069.
GoebelJGrabkaMMLiebigS, et al (2019) The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik [Journal of Economics and Statistics]239(2): 345–360.
30.
GreenA (2017) The Crisis for Young People Generational Inequalities in Education, Work, Housing and Welfare. London: Palgrave.
31.
GrossmannIVarnumMEW (2015) Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science26(3): 311–324.
32.
Grzymala-BusseA (2019) How populists rule: The consequences for democratic governance. Polity51(4): 707–717.
33.
GuillénMF (2001) The Limits of Convergence: Globalization and Organizational Change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
HeichelSPapeJSommererT (2005) Is there convergence in convergence research? An overview of empirical studies on policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy12: 817–840.
35.
HellmeierSColeRGrahnS, et al (2021) State of the world 2020: Autocratization turns viral. Democratization28(6): 1053–1074.
36.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
InglehartR (1971) The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review65(4): 991–1017.
39.
InglehartROysermanD (2004) Individualism, autonomy, self-expression: The human development syndrome. In: VinkenHSoetersJEsterP (eds) Comparing Cultures. Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective. Leiden: Brill, pp. 76–93.
40.
InglehartRWelzelC (2003) Political culture and democracy: Analyzing cross-level linkages. Comparative Politics36(1): 61–79.
41.
InkelesA (1960) Industrial man: The relation of status to experience, perception, and value. American Journal of Sociology66: 1–31.
42.
KelleyJZagórskiK (2004) Economic change and the legitimation of inequality: The transition from socialism to the free market in Central-East Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility22: 319–364.
43.
KemmelmeierMBurnsteinEKrumovK, et al (2003) Individualism, collectivism, and authoritarianism in seven societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology34: 304–322.
44.
KleinMPötschkeM (2004) Die Intra-Individuelle Stabilitat Gesellschaftlicher Wertorientierungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie56(3): 432–456.
45.
KluckhohnFRStrodtbeckFL (1961) Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Company.
46.
KohnMLSchoolerC (1973) Occupational experience and psychological functioning: An assessment of reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review38: 97–118.
47.
KohnMLSchoolerC (1982) Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of their reciprocal effects. American Journal of Sociology87: 1257–1286.
48.
KohnMLNaoiASchoenbachC, et al (1990) Position in the class structure and psychological functioning in the United States, Japan, and Poland. American Journal of Sociology95: 964–1008.
49.
KohnMLSlomczynskiKMJanickaK, et al (1997) Social structure and personality under conditions of radical social change: A comparative analysis of Poland and Ukraine. American Sociological Review62(4): 614–638.
50.
KolmanLNoorderhavenNGHofstedeG, et al (2003) Cross-cultural differences in Central Europe. Journal of Managerial Psychology18(1): 76–88.
51.
KuechlerM (1993) Political attitudes and behavior in Germany: The making of a democratic society. In: HuelshoffASMarkovitsASReichS (eds) From Bundesrepublik to Deutschland. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 33–58.
52.
LinzJJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
LipsetSM (1994) The social requisites of democracy revisited: 1993 presidential address. American Sociological Review59(1): 1–22.
54.
LukesS (1971) The meanings of “individualism..”Journal of the History of Ideas32(1): 45–66.
55.
MachBW (1994) Self-direction and authoritarianism under conditions of radical systemic change: Intergenerational transmission of values and orientations in Poland. Polish Sociological Review108: 323–334.
56.
MachBW (2003) Pokolenie historycznej nadziei i codziennego ryzyka [The generation of historic hope and everyday risk]. Warsaw: ISP PAN.
57.
MannheimK ([1927]) 1952) The problem of generations. In: KecskemetiP (ed.) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 276–322.
58.
MatysiakASteinmetzS (2008) Finding their way? Female employment patterns in West Germany, East Germany, and Poland. European Sociological Review24(3): 331–345.
59.
MechkovaVLührmannALindbergSI (2017) How much democratic backsliding?Journal of Democracy28(4): 162–169.
60.
MeulemanBŻółtakTPokropekA, et al (2022) Why measurement invariance is important in comparative research. Sociological Methods & Research52: 1401–1419.
61.
MeyerJWBoli-BennettJChase-DunnC (1975) Convergence and divergence in development. Annual Review of Sociology1: 223–246.
62.
OstD (2005) The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Post-communist Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63.
OysermanDCoonHMKemmelmeierM (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin128: 3–72.
64.
PesthyMMaderMSchoenH (2021) Why is the AfD so successful in eastern Germany? An analysis of the ideational foundations of the AfD vote in the 2017 federal election. Politische Vierteljahresschr62: 69–91.
65.
PhaletKSchönpflugU (2001) Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology32(2): 186–201.
66.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
67.
RileyMW (1973) Aging and cohort succession: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Public Opinion Quarterly37(1): 35–49.
68.
RobertsBWCaspiA (2003) The cumulative continuity model of personality development: Striking a balance between continuity and change in personality traits across the life course. In: StaudingerUMLindenbergerU (eds) Understanding Human Development: Dialogues with Life Span Psychology. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, pp. 463–481.
69.
RobitzschALüdtkeO (2023) Why full, partial, or approximate measurement invariance are not a prerequisite for meaningful and valid group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Epub ahead of print 3 May. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2023.2191292.
70.
RodgersWL (1982) Estimable functions of age, period, and cohort effects. American Sociological Review47: 774–787.
71.
RyderNB (1965) The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review30: 843–861.
72.
SadowskiI (2009) The contextuality of the concept of civil society—from particular meanings to the common vector of emancipation. Polish Sociological Review165: 63–80.
73.
SadowskiIMachBW (2021) Is the “third generation” of the Polish transformation more economically liberal? Inter-cohort differences in job entrance and egalitarian attitudes. Polish Sociological Review213: 3–26.
74.
SantosHCVarnumMEWGrossmannI (2017) Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science28(9): 1228–1239.
75.
ScheiringG (2020) The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary. Cham: Springer.
76.
SchwartzSH (1990) Individualism-collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology21(2): 139–157.
77.
SchwartzSH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25: 1–65.
StephensNMMarkusHRPhillipsLT (2014) Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology65: 611–634.
80.
SzelenyiICsillagT (2015) Drifting from liberal democracy: Neo-conservative ideology of managed illiberal democratic capitalism in post-communist Europe. Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics1(1): 18–48.
81.
TriandisHC ([1995] 2018) Individualism and Collectivism. New York: Routledge.
82.
TurnerBS (1988) Individualism, capitalism and the dominant culture: A note on the debate. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology24(1): 47–64.
83.
TurnerBS (2005) Talcott Parsons’s sociology of religion and the expressive revolution: The problem of Western individualism. Journal of Classical Sociology5(3): 303–318.
84.
TwengeJM ([2006] 2014) Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled—and More Miserable Than Ever before. New York: Simon & Schuster.
85.
TwengeJMCampbellWKFreemanEC (2012) Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102(5): 1045–1062.
86.
WeisskircherM (2000) The strength of Far-Right AfD in eastern Germany: The east-west divide and the multiple causes behind “populism..”Political Quarterly91(3): 614–622.
87.
WelzelC (2014) Evolution, empowerment, and emancipation: How societies climb the freedom ladder. World Development64: 33–51.
88.
WelzelCInglehartRF (2016) Misconceptions of measurement equivalence. Comparative Political Studies49(8): 1068–1094.
89.
WelzelCBrunkertLKruseS, et al (2021) Non-invariance? An overstated problem with misconceived causes. Sociological Methods & Research52: 1368–1400.
90.
WilenskyHL (2002) Rich Democracies. Political Economy, Public Policy and Performance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
91.
YuFPengTPengK, et al (2016) Cultural value shifting in pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology47: 310–316.
92.
ZawistowskaA (2012) Horyzontalne nierówności edukacyjne we współczesnej Polsce [Horizontal educational inequalities in contemporary Poland]. Warsaw: Scholar.
93.
ZhouCYiuWYVWuMS, et al (2018) Perception of cross-generational differences in child behavior and parent socialization: A mixed-method interview study with Chinese grandmothers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology49: 62–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
