According to critics of globalization, it has ushered in a new era of economic inequality, with some of the biggest “losers” being the majority working classes in advanced capitalist democracies. Economically aggrieved, culturally threatened, and politically excluded, they have become the bedrock of right-wing political parties in much of Europe and the United States. Integral to this phenomenon is the heightened anti-immigrant prejudice espoused by both supporters and leaders of populist movements. The present study investigates a critical issue in this context, one that has been implicitly assumed but relatively understudied: the impact of globalization on xenophobic attitudes among natives. It also examines whether and to what extent globalization moderates the effect of ethnic nationalism on their preferences for restrictive immigration and immigrant assimilation. Findings from multilevel analysis indicate that globalization, as well as the nativist backlash, plays a significant role in directly and indirectly shaping how immigration and immigrants are perceived in host societies.
AlesinaAStantchevaSTesoE (2018) Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution. American Economic Review108(2): 521–554.
2.
ArielyG (2011) Globalization, immigration, national identity: How the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations15(4): 539–557.
3.
ArzheimerK (2018) Explaining electoral support for the radical right. In: RydgrenJ (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–29.
4.
BonikowskiB (2016) Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology42: 427–429.
BrincksAMEndersCKLlabreMM, et al. (2017) Centering predictor variables in three-level contextual models. Multivariate Behavioral Research52(2): 149–163.
7.
BrozJLFriedenJWeymouthS (2021) Populism in place: The economic geography of the globalization backlash. International Organization75: 464–494.
8.
CeobanuAMEscandellX (2010) Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology36: 309–328.
9.
ChristOSchmidKLolliotS, et al. (2014) Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. PNAS111(11): 3996–4000.
10.
CitrinJJohnsonRWrightM (2012) Do patriotism and multiculturalism collide? Competing perspectives from Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political Science45(3): 531–552.
11.
ClarkHDGoodwinMWhiteleyP (2017) Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ColantoneIStanigP (2018a) Global competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review112(2): 201–218.
13.
ColantoneIStanigP (2018b) The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in western Europe. American Journal of Political Science62(4): 936–953.
14.
CrulM (2016) Super-diversity vs. assimilation: How complex diversity in majority-minority cities challenges the assumptions of assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(1): 54–68.
15.
CzymaraCS (2021) Attitudes toward refugees in contemporary Europe: A longitudinal perspective on cross-national differences. Social Forces99(3): 1306–1333.
16.
DavidovEMeulemannBSchwartzS, et al. (2014) Individual values, cultural embeddedness, and anti-immigration sentiments: Explaining differences in the effect of values on attitudes toward immigration across Europe. Cologne Journal for Sociology and Social Psychology66(Suppl. 1): 263–285.
17.
DavidovESeddigDGorodzeiskyA, et al. (2020) Direct and indirect predictors of opposition to immigration in Europe: Individual values, cultural values, and symbolic threat. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(3): 553–573.
18.
DennisonJGeddesA (2019) A rising tide? The salience of immigration and the rise of anti-immigration political parties in western Europe. Political Quarterly90(1): 107–116.
19.
DreherAGastonNMartensP (2008) Measuring Globalization: Gauging Its Consequences. New York: Springer.
20.
FussellE (2014) Warmth of the welcome: Attitudes towards immigrants and immigration policy in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology40: 479–498.
21.
GestJ (2016) The New Minority: White Working-Class Politics in an Age of Immigration and Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
GestJRenyTMayerJ (2017) Roots of the radical right: Nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1694–1719.
23.
GidronNHallPA (2017) The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology68(Suppl. 1): S57–S84.
24.
GreenawayKCruwysT (2018) The source model of group threat: Responding to internal and external threats. American Psychologist74(2): 218–231.
25.
GrigoryanLKPonizovskiyV (2018) The three facets of national identity: Identity dynamics and attitudes toward immigrants in Russia. International Journal of Comparative Sociology59(5): 403–427.
26.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17: 225–249.
27.
HavermansWVerkuytenM (2021) Positive and negative behavioural intentions towards immigrants: A question of ethnic categorisation or worldview conflict?International Journal of Psychology56(5): 633–641.
28.
HeathADavidovEFordR, et al. (2020) Contested terrain: Explaining divergent patterns of public opinion towards immigration within Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(3): 475–488.
29.
HeisigJPSchaefferM (2019) Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review35(2): 258–279.
30.
HeizmannHuth (2021) Economic conditions and perceptions of immigrants as an economic threat in Europe: Temporal dynamics and mediating processes. International Journal of Comparative Sociology62(1): 56–82.
31.
HiersWSoehlTWimmerA (2017) National trauma and the fear of foreigners: How past geopolitical threat heightens anti-immigration sentiment today. Social Forces96(1): 316–388.
32.
HjermMNagayoshiK (2011) The composition of the minority population as a threat: Can real economic and cultural threats explain Xenophobia?International Sociology26(6): 815–843.
33.
HochschildAR (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land. New York: The New Press.
34.
ISSP Research Group (2013) International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III—ISSP 2013 (ZA5950 data file Version 2.0.0). Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. DOI: 10.4232/1.12312.
35.
JensenJBQuinnDPWeymouthS (2017) Winners and losers in international trade: The effects on US presidential voting. International Organization71: 1–35.
36.
KaufmannEGoodwinMJ (2018) The diversity wave: A meta-analysis of the native-born white response to ethnic diversity. Social Science Research76: 120–131.
37.
KayaYKarakoçE (2012) Civilizing vs destructive globalization? A multi-level analysis of anti-immigrant prejudice. International Journal of Comparative Sociology53(1): 23–44.
38.
KeatingAJanmaatJA (2020) Immigrants, inclusion, and the role of hard work: Exploring anti-immigrant attitudes among young people in Britain. Sociological Review68(6): 1212–1228.
39.
KnowlesETroppL (2018) The racial and economic context of Trump support: Evidence for threat, identity, and contact effects in the 2016 presidential election. Social Psychological and Personality Science9(3): 275–284.
40.
KunovichRM (2009) The sources and consequences of national identification. American Sociological Review74(4): 573–593.
41.
KwonRScarboroughWFagileT (2022) Exclusionary attitudes toward immigrants: Globalization and configurations of ascribed and achieved status across 14 European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology63(4): 155–183.
42.
LaknerCMilanovicB (2013) Global income distribution: From the fall of the Berlin Wall to the great recession. Policy Research Working Papers, No. 6719. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
43.
LaurenceJSchmidKHewstoneM (2019) Ethnic diversity, ethnic threat, and social cohesion: (Re)-evaluating the role of perceived out-group threat and prejudice in the relationship between community diversity and intra-community cohesion. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(3): 395–418.
44.
LubbersMCoendersM (2017) Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe. European Union Politics18(1): 98–118.
45.
Margalit (2019) Economic insecurity and causes of populism, reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives33(4): 152–170.
46.
MaxwellR (2019) Geographic divides and cosmopolitanism: Evidence from Switzerland. Comparative Political Studies53(13): 2061–2090.
47.
McLarenLM (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces81(3): 909–936.
48.
MeleadyRSegerCRVermueM (2017) Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti-immigrant prejudice in Brexit. British Journal of Social Psychology56: 799–808.
49.
MeseguerCKemmerlingA (2018) What do you fear? Anti-immigrant sentiment in Latin America. International Migration Review52(1): 236–272.
50.
MeulemanBDavidovEBillietJ (2009) Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research38(2): 352–365.
51.
MilanovicB (2016) Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
MoodC (2010) Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It. European Sociological Review26(1): 67–82. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcp006
53.
NarimanSNguyenLAHadaricsM (2021) Exploring inclusiveness towards immigrants as related to basic values: A network approach. PLoS ONE16(12): e0260624.
54.
NiewenhuisRte GrotenhuisHPelzerB (2012) Influence.ME: Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. The R Journal4(2): 38–47.
55.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump. Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
NouryARolandG (2020) Identity politics and populism in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science23: 421–439.
57.
O’rourkeKHSinnottR (2006) The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy22(4): 838–861.
58.
OliverJERahnWM (2016) Rise of the “Trumpenvolk”: Populism in the 2016 election. American Academy of Political and Social Science667: 189–206.
59.
PepinskyT (2018) A note on listwise deletion versus multiple imputation. Political Analysis26(4): 480–488.
60.
PettigrewTF (2008) Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations32(3): 187–199.
61.
PotrafkeN (2015) The evidence on globalization. The World Economy38(3): 509–552.
62.
PutnamRD (2007) E Pluribus Unum. Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century. The 2007 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30: 137–174.
63.
QuillianL (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review60: 586–611.
64.
RodrikD (2012) The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
65.
RydgrenJ (ed.) (2018) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
SchainMA (2018) Shifting Tides: Radical-Right Populism and Immigration Policy in Europe and the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
67.
ScheveKSlaughterMJ (2004) Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 662–674.
68.
SchlueterEScheepersP (2010) The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research39(2): 285–295.
69.
ScholteJA (2000) Globalization: A Critical Introduction. London: MacMillan.
70.
SnyderJ (1993) Nationalism and the crisis of the post-Soviet state. In: BrownME (ed.) Ethnic Conflict and International Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 79–101.
71.
SpieringsN (2020) Homonationalism and voting for the populist radical right: Addressing unanswered questions by zooming in on the Dutch case. International Journal of Public Opinion Research23: 171–182.
72.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2018) Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2017. Geneva: The UN Refugee Agency.
73.
van der MeerTte GrotenhuisMPelzerB (2010) Influential cases in multilevel modeling: A methodological comment. American Sociological Review75(1): 173–178.
74.
van KlingerenMBoomgaardenHGde VreeseCH (2017) Will conflict tear us apart? The effects of conflict and valenced media messages on polarizing attitudes toward EU immigration and border control. Public Opinion Quarterly81(2): 543–563.
75.
WalterS (2021) The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political Science24: 421–442.
76.
WertsHScheepersPLubbersM (2013) Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics14(2): 183–205.
77.
WhiteIRRoystonPWoodAM (2010) Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine30(4): 377–399.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
