This article examines the impacts of globalization on protest movements. Highlighting the nature of capitalist political regimes in which capitalist societies and political institutions are deeply interconnected, I argue that the relationship between globalization and protest is profoundly constrained by two domestic conditions: the distribution of material resources and the type of political regime. Based on time-series, cross-sectional (TSCS) data in a global sample for the period 1970–2007, the findings indicate that globalization is more likely to increase protest in egalitarian democracies; globalization is not systematically associated with protest under dictatorships, except in the case of a highly unequal dictatorship in which globalization appears to revitalize protest, and hyperglobalization radically diminishes the possibility of protest, especially in democracies.
AcemogluDRobinsonJA (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AcemogluDRobinsonJA (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown.
3.
AidtTJensenP (2014) Workers of the world, united! Franchise extension and the threat of revolution in Europe, 1820–1938. European Economic Review72: 52–75.
4.
ArceMBellingerPT (2007) Low-intensity democracy revisited: The effects of economic liberalization on political activity in Latin America. World Politics60(1): 97–121.
5.
ArceMKimW (2011) Globalization and extra-parliamentary politics in an era of democracy. European Political Science Review3(2): 253–278.
6.
ArrighiGHopkinsTWallersteinI (1989) Antisystemic Movements. London; New York: Verso.
7.
BanksAS (2010) Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Jerusalem, Israel: Databanks International.
8.
BatesRDa-HsiangD (1985) A note on taxation, development, and representative government. Politics and Society14: 53–70.
9.
BeckNKatzJ (2011) Modelling dynamics in time-series-cross-section (TSCS) data. Annual Review of Political Science14: 331–352.
10.
BlockF (2015) A Neo-Polanyian theory of economic crisis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology74(2): 361–378.
11.
BoixC (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BraumoellerB (2004) Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization58(4): 807–820.
14.
BrennerNPeckJTheodoreN (2010) After neoliberalism. Globalizations7(3): 327–345.
15.
BrownW (2006) American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory34(6): 690–714.
16.
CameronACTrivediP (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CardosoFFalettoE (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
18.
ChatterjiM (2013) The globalization of politics: From Egypt to India. Social Movement Studies12(1): 96–102.
19.
CheibubJGandhiJVreelandJ (2009) Democracy and dictatorship revisited (Updated version of the ACLP dataset). Public Choice143(1–2): 67–101.
20.
CohenJRogersJ (1983) On Democracy. Middlesex: Penguin.
21.
CollierPHoefflerASoberdomM (2004) On the duration of civil wars. Journal of Peace Research41(13): 253–273.
22.
CramerBKaufmanR (2011) Views of economic inequality in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies44(9): 1206–1237.
23.
DaviesJ (1962) Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review27(1): 5–19.
24.
Della PortaD (2015) Social Movements in Times of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
Della PortaDAndrettaMMoscaL. (2006) Globalization from below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
DreherAGastonNMartensP (2008) Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences. New York: Springer.
27.
DuménilGLévyD (2011) The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
EpsteinDLBatesRGoldstoneJ. (2006) Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 551–569.
29.
Flesher FominayaC (2014) Social Movements and Globalization: How Protests, Occupations and Uprisings are Changing the World. New York: Palgrave.
30.
FriedmanT (2000) The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Picardo.
31.
GallagherM (2007) Contagious Capitalism: Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
GamsonW (1992) The social psychology of collective action. In: MorrisAMuellerC (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 53–76.
33.
GarrettG (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
GilensM (2014) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
GoldstoneJ (2004) More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields. Theory and Society33(3–4): 333–365.
36.
GoodwinJ (2001) No Other Way Out: Sates and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GurrT (1972) The calculus of civil conflict. Journal of Social Issues28(1): 27–47.
38.
HackerJPiersonP (2011) Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.
39.
HaggardSKaufmanR (2012) Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule. American Political Science Review106(3): 495–516.
40.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
HaysJ (2009) Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
HelleinerE (1994) States and the Reemergence of Global Finance. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press.
43.
HellwigTSamuelsD (2006) Voting in open economies: The electoral consequences of globalization. Comparative Political Studies40(3): 283–306.
44.
HerkenrathMKnollA (2011) Protest events in international press coverage: An empirical critique of cross-national conflict databases. International Journal of Comparative Sociology52(3): 163–180.
45.
HestonASummersRAtenB (2009) Penn world table version 6.3. Center for international comparisons of production, income and prices at the University of Pennsylvania. Available at: http://dc1.chass.utoronto.ca/pwt/
46.
HilbeJ (2011) Negative Binomial Regression, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
HolznerC (2007) The poverty of democracy: Neoliberal reforms and political participation of the poor in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society49(2): 87–122.
48.
InglehartRWelzelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
JaccardJTurrisiR (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. New York: SAGE.
50.
KimW (2007) Social insurance expansion and political regime dynamics in Europe, 1880–1945. Social Science Quarterly88(2): 494–514.
51.
KimW (2010) Polanyi’s double movement and neoliberalization in Korea and Japan. Social Movement Studies9(4): 373–392.
52.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347–361.
53.
KollmeyerC (2015) Globalization and income inequality: How public sector spending moderates this relationship in affluent countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology56(1): 3–28.
54.
KuranT (1997) Private Truth, Public Lies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
KurtzM (2004) The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy: Lessons from Latin America. World Politics56(2): 262–302.
56.
LeeC-SNielsonFAldersonA (2007) Income inequality, global economy and the state. Social Forces86(1): 77–111.
57.
LichbachM (1989) An evaluation of ‘does economic inequality breed political conflict?’ Studies. World Politics41(4): 431–470.
58.
LindblomC (1977) Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.
59.
LukesS ([1974]2005) Power: A Radical View. New York: Palgrave.
60.
McAdamDTarrowS (2010) Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics8(2): 529–542.
61.
McAdamDTarrowSTillyC (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
McCloskeyDZiliakS (1996) The standard error of regressions. Journal of Economic Literature34(1): 97–114.
63.
MarshallMGJaggersK (2010) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2008. Severn, MD: Center for Systematic Peace.
64.
MayerTMottT (1990) Effective demand and structural dependence of the state. In: GreenbergEMayerT (eds) Changes in the State. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 53–71.
65.
MeltzerARichardS (1981) A rational theory of the size of the government. Journal of Political Economy89(5): 914–927.
66.
MeyerDTarrowS (1998) The Social Movement Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
67.
MilanovicB (2016) Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
MilibandR (1969) The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.
69.
MoeneKWallersteinM (2001) Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review95(4): 859–874.
70.
MullerESeligsonM (1987) Inequality and insurgency. American Political Science Review81(2): 425–452.
71.
MunckGVerkuilenJ (2002) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies35(1): 5–34.
72.
MunckR (2007) Globalization and Contestation. London: Routledge.
73.
NorthD (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
O’DonnellG (1979) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
75.
OffeC (1974) Structural problems of the capitalist state: Class rule and the political system. On the selectiveness of political institutions. German Political Studies1: 31–54.
76.
OffeCWiesanthalH (1980) Two logics of collective action: Theoretical notes on social class and organizational form. Political Power and Social Theory1: 67–115.
77.
OlesenT (2005) The uses and misuses of globalization in the study of social movements. Social Movement Studies4(1): 49–63.
78.
PickerillJ (2012) Why does occupy matter?Social Movement Studies11(3): 279–287.
79.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
PioreM (2009) Second thoughts: On economics, sociology, neoliberalism: Polanyi’s double movement and intellectual vacuums. Socio-Economic Review7(1): 161–175.
81.
PolanyiK([1944]2001) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
82.
PolilloS (2012) Globalization: Civilizing or destructive? An empirical test of the international determinants of generalized trust. International Journal of Comparative Sociology53(1): 45–65.
83.
PowellGB (1982) Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84.
PrzeworskiA (1985) Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
PrzeworskiA (1991) Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86.
PrzeworskiA (2009) Conquered or granted? A history of suffrage extensions. British Journal of Political Science39(2): 291–321.
87.
PrzeworskiA (2010) Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88.
PrzeworskiAAlvarezMCheibubJA. (2000) Democracy and Development: Material Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89.
PrzeworskiAWallersteinM (1988) Structural dependence of the state on capital. American Political Science Review82(1): 11–29.
90.
RauchJChitrapuSEastmanST., (2007) From Seattle 1999 to New York 2004: A longitudinal analysis of journalistic framing of the movement for democratic globalization. Social Movement Studies6(2): 131–145.
91.
ReitanR (2012) Theorizing and engaging the global movement: From anti-globalization to global democratization. Globalizations9(3): 323–335.
92.
RobertsK (2008) The mobilization of opposition to economic liberalization. Annual Review of Political Science11: 327–349.
93.
RobertsonGTeitelbaumE (2011) Foreign direct investment, regime type, and labor protest in developing countries. American Journal of Political Science55(3): 665–677.
94.
RodrikD (2007) One Economics, Many Recipes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
RodrikD (2011) The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: Norton.
96.
RuggieJ (1982) International regimes, transactions, and changes: Embedded liberalism in the post-war economic order. International Organization36(2): 379–415.
97.
SchoppaL (2006) Race for the Exits: The Unraveling of Japan’s System of Social Protection. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
98.
ScottJ (1977) The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
99.
SoltF (2009) Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 231–242.
100.
SwankD (2002) Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101.
TarrowS (2011) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102.
TherbornG (1978) What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules?London; New York: Verso.
103.
TillyC (2006) Regimes and Repertoires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UdayagiriMWaltonJ (2003) Global transformation and local countermovements: The prospects for democracy under neoliberalism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology44(4): 309–343.
106.
WallersteinMWesternB (2000) Unions in decline? What has changed and why. Annual Review of Political Science3: 355–377.
107.
WrightEO (2010) Envisioning Real Utopias. London; New York: Verso.
108.
ŽižekS (2012) The Year of Dreaming Dangerously. London; New York: Verso.
