This study examines how democracy, government ideology, and globalization have shaped social expenditures in 67 less developed countries from 1975 to 2005. The empirical results show that more democratic nations spend a greater amount on social security and welfare (SSW), while leftist governments spend more on education. This is because, in most less developed nations, SSW programs disproportionately benefit formal-sector workers, who tend to be the decisive voters in the countries, and education spending helps a broader spectrum of people. The article also examines factors related to globalization and finds that a higher level of external debt is strongly associated with reduced SSW spending, which imposes direct costs and burdens to business. The results in this article provide evidence that, even in less developed countries, political leaders’ commitment to social expenditures varies according to their electoral, ideological, and economic interests.
AcemogluD (2003) Patterns of skill premia. Review of Economic Studies70(2): 199–230.
2.
AcemogluDRobinsonJA (2008) Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. American Economic Review98(1): 267–293.
3.
AppelH (2006) International imperatives and tax reform: Lessons from post-communist Europe. Comparative Politics39(1): 43–62.
4.
AspinwallM (1996) The unholy social trinity: Modeling social dumping under conditions of capital mobility and free trade. West European Politics19(1): 125–150.
5.
AvelinoGBrownDSHunterW (2005) The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 625–641.
6.
BakerAGreeneKF (2011) The Latin American left’s mandate: Free-market policies and issue voting in new democracies. World Politics63(1): 43–77.
7.
BaratLMPalmerNBasuS. (2003) Do malaria control interventions reach the poor? A view through the equity lens. American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene71: 174–178.
8.
BarroRJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics106(2): 407–443.
9.
BeckNKatzJ (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data. American Political Science Review89: 634–647.
10.
BeckTClarkGGroffA. (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165–176.
11.
BellAJonesK (2015) Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-Series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods3(1): 133–153.
12.
BirdsallN (1996) Public spending on higher education in developing countries: Too much or too little?. Economics of Education Review15(4): 407–419.
13.
BlondelJ (1969) An Introduction to Comparative Government. New York: Praeger Publishers.
14.
BrownDHunterW (1999) Democracy and social spending in Latin America, 1980–92. American Political Science Review93: 779–790.
15.
CameronD (1978) The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review72(4): 1243–1261.
16.
CarejaREmmeneggerP (2009) The politics of public spending in post-communist countries. East European Politics and Societies23(2): 165–184.
17.
Castro-LealFDaytonJDemeryL. (1999) Public social spending in Africa: Do the poor benefit?World Bank Research Observer14(1): 49–72.
18.
CookLJOrensteinMARueschemeyerM (1999) Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO; Oxford: Westview Press.
19.
De FerrantiDPerryGFerreiraF. (2004) Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History?Washington, DC: The World Bank.
20.
DownsA (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy65(2): 135–150.
21.
DreherA (2006) IMF and economic growth: The effects of programs, loans, and compliance with conditionality. World Development34(5): 769–788.
22.
DupuyA (1998) Thoughts on globalization, Marxism, and the left. Latin American Perspectives25(6): 55–58.
23.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2002) Social Panorama of Latin America. Santiago, Chile: United Nations ECLAC.
24.
Esping-AndersenG (1985) Politics against Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
FeenstraRCHansonG (1997) Foreign direct investment and relative wages: Evidence from Mexico’s Maquiladoras. Journal of International Economics42(3): 371–393.
27.
Fernandez-AriasE (1996) The new wave of private capital inflows: Push or pull?Journal of Development Economics48(2): 389–418.
28.
FilmerDPritchettJ (1999) The impact of public spending on health: Does money matter?Social Science & Medicine49(10): 1309–1323.
29.
Freedom House (2015) Freedom in the World 2015. New York: Freedom House.
30.
GarrettG (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GwatkinD (2000) Heath inequalities and the health of the poor; What do we know? What can we do?Bull World Health Organ78(1): 3–18.
33.
HaE (2007) Distributive politics in the era of globalization. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, CA.
34.
HaE (2008) Globalization, veto players, and welfare spending. Comparative Political Studies41(6): 783–813.
35.
HaE (2012) Globalization, government ideology, and income inequality in developing countries. Journal of Politics74(2): 541–557.
36.
HaEKangMK (2015) Government policy responses to financial crises: Identifying patterns and policy origins in developing countries. World Development68: 264–281.
37.
HaggardSKaufmanRR (2008) Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
HaggardSKaufmanRRLongJD (2013) Income, occupation, and preferences for redistribution in the developing world. Studies in Comparative International Development48(2): 113–140.
39.
HansonGHHarrisonA (1999) Trade liberalization and wage inequality in Mexico. Industrial and Labor Relations Review52(2): 271–288.
40.
HarrisJTodaroM (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: A two sector Analysis. American Economic Review60(1): 126–142.
41.
HuberEStephensJD (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Market. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
42.
HuberEStephensJD (2012) Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
HuberEMustilloTStephensJD (2008) Politics and social spending in Latin America. The Journal of Politics70(2): 420–436.
44.
HuberENielsenFPribbleJ. (2006) Politics and inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. American Sociological Review71(6): 943–963.
45.
International Labor Organization (2001) Key Indicators of Labor Market 2001-2002. New York: Routledge.
46.
KaufmanRSegura-UbiergoA (2001) Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross section analysis, 1973-97. World Politics53(4): 553–587.
47.
KeeferPKhemaniS (2005) Democracy, public expenditures, and the poor: Understanding political incentives for providing public services. The World Bank Research Observer20(1): 1–27.
48.
KimW (2010) Does class matter? Social cleavages in South Korea’s electoral politics in the era of neoliberalism. Review of Political Economy22(4): 589–616.
49.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 341–355.
50.
KohliA (2004) State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
KollmeyerC (2012) Consumer markets and national income inequality: A study of 18 advanced capitalist countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology53(5/6): 400–418.
52.
KwonHJ (2005) Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Development and Change36(3): 477–497.
LevitskySRobertsK (eds) (2011) The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
LindertKSkoufiasEShapiroJ (2005) Redistributing income to the poor and the rich: Public transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. SP Discussion Paper no. 0605, August. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
56.
LipsmeyerCS (2000) Reading between the welfare lines: Politics and policy structure in post-communist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies52(7): 1191–1211.
57.
LiptonM (1977) Why Poor People Stay Poor: A Study of Urban Bias in World Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
LondonBWilliamsB (1990) National politics, international dependency, and basic needs provision: A cross-national Analysis. Social Forces69(2): 565–584.
59.
LongJErvinL (2000) Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. American Statistician54(3): 217–224.
60.
LunaJZechmeisterE (2005) Political representation in Latin America: A study of elite-mass congruence in nine countries. Comparative Political Studies38(4): 388–416.
61.
McGuireJ (1999) Labor union strength and human development in East Asia and Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development33: 3–33.
62.
MainwaringSTorcalM (2006) Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 204–227.
63.
MaresICarnesME (2009) Social policy in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science12: 93–113.
64.
MarshallMGJaggersK (2002) Polity IV dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
MeltzerARichardS (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy89: 914–927.
67.
Mesa-LagoC (ed.) (1985) The Crisis of Social Security and Health Care. Pittsburgh, PA: Center for Latin American Studies.
68.
Mesa-LagoC (1994) Changing Social Security in Latin America. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
69.
MilanovicB (1995) Distributional incidence of cash and in-kind transfers in Eastern Europe and Russia. In: Van de WalleDNeadK (eds) Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp 489–520.
70.
MoonBDixonW (1985) Politics, the state, and basic human needs: A cross-national study. American Journal of Political Science29: 661–694.
71.
MorleySCoadyD (2003) From Social Assistance to Social Development: Targeted Education Subsidies in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
72.
MukherjeeBSingerDA (2008) Monetary institutions, partisanship, and inflation targeting. International Organization62(2): 323–358.
73.
MurilloMV (2001) Partisan Coalitions and Labor Competition in Latin America: Trade Unions and Market Reforms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74.
MusgroveP (1996) Public and Private Roles in Health: Theory and Financing Patterns. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
75.
NelP (2005) Democratization and the dynamics of income distribution in low and middle-income countries. Politikon32(1): 17–43.
76.
NooruddinIRudraN (2014) Are developing countries really defying the embedded liberalism compact?World Politics66(4): 603–640.
77.
NooruddinISimmonsJ (2009) Openness, uncertainty, and social spending: Implications for the globalization-welfare state debate. International Studies Quarterly53(3): 841–866.
78.
NoyS (2011) New contexts, different patterns? A comparative analysis of social spending and government health expenditure in Latin America and the OECD. International Journal of Comparative Sociology52(3): 215–244.
79.
OrensteinMA (2008) Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80.
PiersonP (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics48(2): 143–179.
81.
PrasadMDengY (2009) Taxation and the worlds of welfare. Socio-Economic Review7(3): 431–457.
82.
PribbleJHuberEStephensJD (2009) Politics, policies, and poverty in Latin America. Comparative Politics41(4): 387–407.
83.
ReinikkaRSvenssonJ (2004) Local capture: Evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. The Quarterly Journal of Economics119(2): 679–705.
84.
RobbinsDJ (1995) Trade, Trade Liberalization and Inequality in Latin America and East Asia: Synthesis of Seven Country Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.
85.
RobinsonJA (2010) The political economy of redistributive policies. In: Lopez-CalvaLFLustigN (eds) Declining Inequality in Latin America: A Decade of Progress?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and UNDP, pp 39–71.
86.
RodrikD (1998) Why do more open economies have bigger governments?Journal of Political Economy106(5): 997–1032.
87.
RossM (2006) Is democracy good for the poor?American Journal of Political Science50(4): 860–874.
88.
RudraN (2008) Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89.
RudraNHaggardS (2005) Globalization, democracy, and effective welfare spending in the developing world. Comparative Political Studies38(9): 1015–1049.
90.
RudraNNooruddinI (2010) Globalization and prison?The politics of social welfare reforms in developing countries. Working Paper, Georgetown University.
91.
RuggieM (1996) Realignments in the Welfare State: Health Policy in the United States, Britain, and Canada. New York: Columbia University Press.
StrangeS (1996) The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
94.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
96.
VreelandJR (2007) The International Monetary Fund: Politics of Conditional Lending. New York: Routledge.
97.
WeylandK (1996) Obstacles to social reform in Brazil. Comparative Politics29(1): 1–22.
98.
WibbelsE (2006) Dependency revisited: International markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization60(2): 433–468.
99.
WibbelsEAhlquistJS (2011) Development, trade, and social insurance. International Studies Quarterly55(1): 125–149.
