This article expands previous research on self-interested reactions and intergroup contact by showing that (1) intergroup contact constrains the impact of personal economic vulnerability on perceived out-group threat, (2) personal economic vulnerability has no influence on perceived out-group threat when contact is most intense, and (3) the ability of intergroup contact to reduce perceived out-group threat is strongest among the most economically vulnerable. These findings were generated by a fixed-effects regression of 21 countries and almost 34,000 respondents sampled in the European Social Survey (2002–2003). More generally, our findings suggest that self-interested reactions can be overpowered by the cognitive and affective components of intergroup contact. The concluding section expands on the theoretical implications of the results.
AllportGW ([1954] 1979) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
3.
BatsonDPolycarpouMPHarmonJE. (1997) Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(1): 105–118.
4.
BerryWDGolderMMiltonD (2012) Improving tests of theories positing interaction. Journal of Politics74(3): 653–671.
5.
BlumerH (1958) Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review1: 3–7.
6.
BoboLHutchingsVL (1996) Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review61(6): 951–972.
7.
BraderTValentinoNA (2007) Identities, interests, and emotions: Symbolic versus material wellsprings of fear, anger, and enthusiasm. In: NeumanRMarcusGECriglerAN. (eds) The Affect Effect. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 180–201.
CaseCEGreeleyAMFuchsS (1989) Social determinants of racial prejudice. Sociological Perspectives32(4): 469–483.
10.
ChongDCitrinJConleyP (2001) When self-interest matters. Political Psychology22(3): 541–570.
11.
CitrinJGreenDP (1990) The self-interest motive in American public opinion. Research in Micropolitics3: 1–28.
12.
CoendersMScheepersP (1998) Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979–1993: Effects of period, cohort, and individual characteristics. European Sociological Review14(4): 405–422.
13.
CoendersMScheepersP (2003) The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology24(2): 313–343.
14.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
DixonJC (2006) The ties that bind and those that don’t: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Social Forces84(4): 2179–2204.
16.
DovidioJFGartnerSLKawakamiK (2003) Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6(6): 5–21.
17.
EisenbergNEggumNDGiuntaLD (2010) Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review4(1): 143–180.
18.
European Social Survey (ESS) (2011) ESS-2002 Documentation Report, Edition 6.2. The ESS Data Archive.
19.
FazioRHChenJMcDonelEC. (1982) Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology18(4): 339–357.
20.
GundelachB (2014) In diversity we trust: The positive effect of ethnic diversity on outgroup trust. Political Behavior36(1): 125–142.
21.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2010) Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review104(1): 61–84.
22.
HayesBCDowdsL (2006) Social contact, cultural marginality or economic self-interest? Attitudes towards immigrants in Northern Ireland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(3): 455–476.
23.
HelloEScheepersPSleegersP (2006) Why the more educated are less inclined to keep ethnic distance: An empirical test of four explanations. Ethnic and Racial Studies29(5): 959–985.
24.
HernesGKnudsenK (1992) Norwegians’ attitudes toward new immigrants. Acta Sociologica35(2): 123–139.
25.
HodsonG (2011) Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact?Current Directions in Psychological Science20(3): 154–159.
26.
HuckfeldtRMondakJHayesM. (2013) Networks, interdependence, and social influence in politics. In: HuddyLSearsDOLevyJS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 662–698.
27.
InglehartR (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
KenworthyJBTurnerRNHewstoneM. (2005) Intergroup contact: When does it work and why? In: DovidioJFGlickPRudmanL (eds) On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years After Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 278–292.
29.
KinderDRMendelbergT (1995) Cracks in American apartheid: The political impact of prejudice among desegregated whites. Journal of Politics57(2): 402–424.
30.
KluegelJRSmithER (1983) Affirmative action attitudes: Effects of self-interest, racial affect, and stratification beliefs on whites’ views. Social Forces61(3): 797–824.
31.
KoschateMVan DickR (2011) A multilevel test of Allport’s contact conditions. Group Process & Intergroup Relations14(6): 769–787.
32.
MackuenMMarcusGENeumanWR. (2007) The third way: The theory of affective intelligence and American democracy. In: NeumanWRMarcusGECriglerAN. (eds) The Affect Effect. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 124–151.
33.
McLarenLM (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the expulsion of migrants. Social Forces81(3): 909–936.
34.
MarcusGENeumanWRMackuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
MillerDASmithERMackieDM (2004) Effects of intergroup contact and political predispositions on prejudice: Role of intergroup emotions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations7(3): 221–237.
36.
MillerN (2002) Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues58(2): 387–410.
37.
MondakJMutzD (2006) The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics68(1): 140–155.
38.
MonroeKR (2001) Paradigm shift: From rational choice to perspective. International Political Science Review22(1): 151–172.
39.
MutzDC (2002) Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review96(1): 111–126.
40.
NagayoshiKHjermM (2015) Anti-immigration attitudes in different welfare states: Do types of labor market policies matter?International Journal of Comparative Sociology. Epub ahead of print 26June2015. DOI: 10.1177/0020715215591379.
41.
NapierJLJostJT (2008) The ‘antidemocratic personality’ revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues64(3): 595–617.
42.
NorrisP (2004) From the civic culture to the Afrobarometer. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section in Comparative Politics. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/APSA-CP.pdf
43.
Page-GouldEMendoza-DentonRTroppL (2008) With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(5): 1080–1094.
44.
PagottoLVociAMaculanV (2010) The effectiveness of intergroup contact at work: Mediators and moderators of hospital workers’ prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology20(4): 317–330.
45.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49: 65–85.
46.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2005) Allport’s intergroup contact hypothesis: Its history and influence. In: DovidioJFGlickPRudmanL (eds) On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 262–277.
47.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751–783.
48.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2008) How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic test of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology38(6): 922–934.
49.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2011) When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact. New York: Psychology Press.
50.
PettigrewTFChristOWagnerU. (2007) Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations31(4): 411–425.
51.
PichlerF (2010) Foundations of anti-immigrant sentiment: The variable nature of perceived group threat across changing European societies 2002–2006. International Journal of Comparative Sociology51(6): 445–469.
52.
PickettJTBakerTMetcalfeC. (2014) Contact and compromise: Explaining support for conciliatory measures in the context of violent intergroup conflict. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(5): 585–619.
53.
QuillianL (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review60(4): 586–611.
54.
RaijmanRSemyonovMSchmidtP (2003) Do foreigners deserve rights? Determinants of public views toward foreigners in Germany and Israel. European Sociological Review19(4): 379–392.
55.
RiekBMManiaEWGaertnerSL (2006) Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review10(4): 336–353.
56.
ScheepersPGijsbertsMCoendersM (2002) Ethnic exclusionism in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review18(1): 17–34.
57.
ScheveKFSlaughterMJ (2001) Globalization and the Perceptions of American Workers. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
58.
SchneiderSL (2008) Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review24(1): 53–67.
59.
SchumanHSteehCBoboL. (1997) Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations (rev. edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
SearsDOFunkCL (1990) The limited effect of economic self-interest on the political attitudes of the mass public. Journal of Behavioral Economics19(3): 247–271.
61.
SearsDOFunkCL (1991) The role of self interest in social and political attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology24: 1–91.
62.
SearsDOHenslerCPSpeerL (1979) Whites’ opposition to ‘busing’: Self-Interest or symbolic politics?American Political Science Review73(2): 669–384.
63.
SemyonovMRaijmanRGorodzeiskyA (2008) Foreigners’ impact on European societies. Public views and perceptions in a cross-national comparative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49(1): 5–29.
64.
SemyonovMRaijmanRTovAY. (2004) Population size, perceived threat, and exclusion: A multiple-indicators analysis of attitudes toward foreigners in Germany. Social Science Research33(4): 681–701.
65.
SidesJCitrinJ (2007) European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science37(3): 477–504.
66.
SnidermanPMHagendoornL (2007) When Ways of Life Collide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
SnidermanPMPiazzaT (1993) The Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
68.
StephanWGDiaz-LovingRDuranA (2000) Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology31(2): 240–249.
69.
StephanWGRenfroCLDavisMD (2008) The role of threat in intergroup relations. In: WagnerUTroppLRFinchilescuG. (eds) Improving Intergroup Relations: Building on the Legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 55–72.
70.
SwartHHewstoneMChristO. (2010) The impact of crossgroup friendships in South Africa: Affective mediators and multigroup comparisons. Journal of Social Issues66(2): 309–333.
71.
TauschNTamTHewstoneM. (2007) Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology46(3): 541–556.
72.
TolnaySEBeckEM (1992) Toward a threat model of southern black lynchings. In: LiskaAE (ed.) Social Threat and Social Control. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 33–52.
73.
VezzaliLGiovanniniD (2012) Secondary transfer of intergroup contact: The role of intergroup attitudes, intergroup anxiety and perspective taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology22(2): 125–144.
74.
VezzaliLGiovanniniDCapozzaD (2010) Longitudinal effects of contact on intergroup relations: The role of majority and minority group membership and intergroup emotions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology20(6): 462–479.
75.
VirtanenSVHuddyL (1998) Old-fashioned racism and new forms of racial prejudice. Journal of Politics60(2): 311–332.
76.
WagnerUZickA (1995) The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology25(1): 41–56.
77.
WeberH (2015) National and regional proportion of immigrants and perceived threat of immigration: A three-level analysis in Western Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. Epub ahead of publication 10February2015. DOI: 10.1177/0020715215571950.
