How does economic liberalization — or a country’s integration into the global economy — affect its economic performance and the distribution of wealth? There have been heated debates on positive and negative sides of globalization. This article seeks to fill the existing gap in the study of globalization and its socio-economic outcomes by focusing on the mediating effect of political corruption in countries from Asia and Eastern Europe. The authors suggest that, in countries with high levels of corruption, extensive economic liberalization brings faster economic growth. However, the economic growth does not improve the corrupt countries’ distributive justice, increasing poverty and leaving the level of inequality intact after the economic development. On the other hand, economic liberalization in less corrupt countries neither generates fast economic growth, nor significantly improves the countries’ poverty and inequality. The empirical result implies that neoliberal economic reform per se does not have direct impact on a country’s distributive justice. This article studies 40 developing countries from Asia and Eastern Europe.
Ades A. and Di Tella R. ( 1999) Rents, Competition, and Corruption. American Economic Review89(4): 982-993.
2.
Alderson AS and Nielsen F. ( 2002) Globalization and the great U-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries. American Journal of Sociology107(5): 1244-1299.
3.
Amundsen I. ( 1999) Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues . Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights.
4.
Anderson CJ and Tverdova YV ( 2003) Corruption, political alliances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science47(1): 91-109.
5.
Baran PA ( 1956) The Political Economy of Growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
6.
Bardhan P. ( 1997) Corruption and development: A review of issues . Journal of Economic Literature35(3): 1320-1346.
7.
Baum MA and Lake DA ( 2003) The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital . American Journal of Political Science47(2): 333-347.
8.
Bayley DH ( 1967) The effects of corruption in a developing nation . Western Political Quarterly19(4): 719-732.
9.
Brambor T., William RC and Golder M. ( 2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Political Analysis14(1): 63-82.
10.
Beck N. and Katz JK ( 1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data in comparative politics. American Political Science Review89(3): 634-647.
11.
Beck N. and Katz JK ( 1996) Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time series and cross-sectional models. Political Analysis6(1): 1-36.
12.
Beck PJ and Maher MW ( 1986) A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets . Economics Letters20: 1-5.
13.
Beck T., Clarke G., Groff A., Keefer P. and Walsh P. ( 2001) New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15(1): 165-176.
14.
Bliss C. and Di Tella R. ( 1997) Does competition kill corruption? Journal of Political Economy105(5): 1001-1023.
15.
Bornschier V. ( 1980) Multinational corporation and economic growth: A cross-national test of the decapitalization thesis. Journal of Development Economics7(2): 191-210.
16.
Bornschier V. and Chase-Dunn C. ( 1985) Transnational Corporations and Underdevelopment . New York: Praeger.
17.
Bornschier V., Chase-Dunn C. and Rubinson R. ( 1978) Cross-national evidence of the effects of foreign investment and aid on economic growth and inequality: A survey of finds and a reanalysis . American Journal of Sociology84(3): 651-683.
18.
Bussmann M., de Soysa I. and Oneal JR ( 2005) The effect of globalization on national income inequality . Comparative Sociology4(3-4): 285-312.
19.
Chase-Dunn C. ( 1975) The effects of international economic dependence on development and inequality: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review40(6): 720-738.
20.
de Soysa I. and Oneal JR ( 1999) Boon or bane? Reassessing the productivity of foreign direct investment. American Sociological Review64(5): 766-782.
21.
Dixon WJ and Boswell T. ( 1996) Dependency, disarticulation, and denominator effects: Another look at foreign capital penetration. American Journal of Sociology102(2): 543-562.
22.
Della Porta D. ( 2000) Social capital, beliefs in government, and political corruption . In: Pharr S and Putnam R (eds) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling in the Trilateral Countries?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002-230.
23.
Doig A. and Theobald R. ( 2000) Corruption and Democratisation. London : Frank Cass.
24.
Dollar D. and Kraay A. ( 2002) Spreading the wealth. Foreign Affairs81(1): 120-133.
25.
Etzioni-Halevy E. ( 1985) Bureaucracy and Democracy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
Firebaugh G. ( 1992) Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment . American Journal of Sociology98(1): 105-130.
27.
Firebaugh G. and Goesling B. ( 2004) Accounting for the recent decline in global income inequality . American Journal of Sociology110(2): 283-312.
28.
Forsyth J. ( 2000) Growth and poor. Letters to the Editor . The Economist, June, pp. 10-17.
29.
Freedom House (2008) Freedom in the World 2008 Survey Release (online). Available from: http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=395, accessed 10 August 2009.
30.
Friedman E., Johnson S., Kaufmann D. and Zoido-Lobaton P. ( 2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics77(3): 459-493.
31.
Gerring J. and Thacker SC ( 2004) Political institutions and corruption: The role of the unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science34(2): 295-330.
32.
Gerring J. and Thacker SC ( 2005) Do neoliberal policies deter political corruption ? International Organization59(1): 233-254.
33.
Gould DJ and Amaro-Reyes JA ( 1983) The effects of corruption on administrative performance, World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 580, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
34.
Gupta S., Davoodi H. and Alonso-Terme R. ( 1998) Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? , IMF Working Papers98/76, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
35.
Haggard SM ( 1990) Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the New Industrializing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
36.
Huntington SP ( 1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Huntington SP and Dominguez JI ( 1975) Political Development. In: Greenstein FI and Polsby NW (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 3. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1-114.
38.
Kang DC ( 2003) Transaction costs and crony capitalism in east Asia. Comparative Politics35(4): 439-458.
39.
Kaufman RR and Segura-Ubiergo A. ( 2001) Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973-97. World Politics53(4): 553-587.
40.
Kaufmann D. ( 1997) Corruption: The facts. Foreign Policy107: 114-131.
41.
Kaufmann D., Kraay A. and Zoido-Lobaton P. ( 1999) Governance matters, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper2196.
42.
Kentor J. ( 1998) The long-term effects of foreign investment dependence on economic growth, 1940-1990. American Journal of Sociology103(4): 1024-1046.
43.
Kentor J. and Boswell T. ( 2003) Foreign capital dependence and development: A new direction . American Sociological Review68(2): 301-313.
44.
Klitgaard R. ( 1991) Political corruption: Strategies for reform. Journal of Democracy2(4): 86-101.
45.
Krueger AO ( 1974) The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society . American Economic Review64(3): 291-303.
46.
Lake DA and Baum M. ( 2001) The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services. Comparative Political Studies34(6): 587-621.
47.
Larrain FB and Tavares J. ( 2004) Does Foreign Direct Investment Decrease Corruption?Cuadernos de Economia41(123): 217-230.
48.
Lederman D., Loayza NV and Soares RR ( 2005) Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics and Politics17(1): 1-35.
49.
Leys C. ( 1989) What is the problem about corruption? In: Heidenheimer AJ, Johnston M and LeVine VT (eds) Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 51-65.
50.
Lien D.a Hsiang D. ( 1986) Note on competitive bribery games. Economics Letters22: 337-341.
51.
Mauro P. ( 1995) Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics110(3): 681-712.
52.
Mauro P. ( 1997) The effects of corruption on growth, investment and government expenditure: A cross-country analysis. In: Elliot KA (ed.) Corruption and the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics , 83-108.
53.
Montinola GR and Jackman WJ ( 2002) Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study. British Journal of Political Science32(1): 147-170.
54.
Morris SD ( 1991) Corruption and politics in contemporary Mexico . Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
55.
Nice DC ( 1986) The policy consequences of political corruption . Political Behavior8(3): 287-295.
56.
Nye JS ( 1967) Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis . American Political Science Review61(2): 417-427.
57.
Nye JS ( 1989) Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis . In: Heidenheimer AJ, Johnston M and LeVine VT (eds) Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 963-983.
58.
Perry GE and Burki SJ ( 1998) Beyond the Washington Consensus. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
59.
Pharr SJ ( 2000) Officials’ misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies. In: Pharr SJ and Putnam RD (eds) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 173-201.
60.
Plumper T., Troeger VE and Manow P. ( 2005) Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research44(2): 327-354.
61.
Przeworski A, Stokes SC and Manin B (eds) ( 1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
62.
Ravallion M. ( 2003) The debate on globalization, poverty and inequality: Why measurement matters. International Affairs79(4): 739-753.
63.
Rodrik D. ( 1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics .
64.
Rodrik D. ( 1999) The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Washington DC: Overseas Development Council.
65.
Sanholtz W. and Gray MM ( 2003) International Integration and National Corruption . International Organization57(4): 761-800.
66.
Sandholtz W. and Koetzle W. ( 2000) Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade. International Studies Quarterly44(1): 31-50.
67.
Seligson MA ( 2002) Trouble in paradise? The erosion of system support, 1978-1999 . Latin American Research Review37(1): 160-185.
68.
Shleifer A. and Vishny RW ( 1993) Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics108(3): 599-617.
69.
Simai M. ( 2006) The Civil Society and the Development Process (online) . Available from: http://www.menszt.hu/a_tarsasagrol/ensz_akademiak/ensz_akademia_2004_2005/the_civil_society_and_the_development_process, accessed 10 August 2009.
70.
Tavits M. ( 2007) Clarity of responsibility and corruption. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 218-229.
71.
Treisman D. ( 2000) The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study . Journal of Public Economics76(3): 399-457.
72.
United Nations (1989) Corruption in Government. New York: United Nations.
73.
Weede E. ( 2004) Does Human Capital Strongly Affect Growth Rates? Yes, but Only If Assessed Properly. Comparative Sociology3(2): 115-134.
74.
World Bank (1997) World Development Report, 1997. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
75.
You J-s and Khagram S. ( 2005) A comparative study of inequality and corruption . American Sociological Review70(1): 136-157.
