Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The early fault signal of rolling bearings is very weak, and when analyzed under strong background noise, the traditional signal processing method is not ideal. To extract fault characteristic information more clearly, the second-order UCPSR method is applied to the early fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. The continuous potential function itself is a continuous sinusoidal function. The particle transition is smooth and the output is better. Because of its three parameters, the potential structure is more comprehensive and has more abundant characteristics. When the periodic signal, noise and potential function are the best match, the system exhibits better denoise compared to that of other methods. This paper discusses the influence of potential parameters on the motion state of particles between potential wells in combination with the potential parameter variation diagrams discussed. Then, the formula of output signal-to-noise ratio is derived to further study the relationships among potential parameters, and then the ant colony algorithm is used to optimize potential parameters in order to obtain the optimal output signal-to-noise ratio. Finally, an early weak fault diagnosis method for bearings based on the underdamped continuous potential stochastic resonance model is proposed. Through simulation and experimental verification, the underdamped continuous potential stochastic resonance results are compared with those of the time-delayed feedback stochastic resonance method, which proves the validity of the underdamped continuous potential stochastic resonance method.

Keywords

Continuous potential fault diagnosis stochastic resonance application

Introduction

A rolling bearing is a frequently used part in rotary machinery. If a problem within this part occurs, production accuracy can be affected slightly, resulting in both the scrapping of a product, and seriously endangering the safety and property of machinery operators. Therefore, monitoring the operational status of these devices has become a top priority in the mechanical fault diagnosis industry.¹

To improve the effectiveness of early bearing fault extraction, scholars have proposed new methods such as acoustical signal extraction method,² frequency selection multiexpansion,³ orthogonal matching pursuit,⁴ wavelet transformation,^5,6 empirical mode decomposition,^7,8 time-domain averaging,^9,10 and spectral kurtosis.^11,12 The essence of the above methods is to suppress noise and highlight bearing fault features. Although these methods can effectively extract fault feature frequency, ultimately, useful information is lost while suppressing noise, which has an adverse effect on fault feature extraction. Stochastic resonance (SR) offers a new idea to signal processing. It utilizes the noise signal by transferring the noise energy to the target signal, then it enhances and extracts the fault characteristic frequency. The SR method¹³ was first proposed by Italian scholars when they were studying climate problems and has been widely used in biology,¹⁴ physics,¹⁵ astronomy¹⁶ and other fields. The earliest research on SR in the field of mechanical fault diagnosis focused on overcoming the problem of small-parameter limitation. However, the actual fault signals are mostly made up of large-parameter signals. Currently, the signal can be preprocessed through methods as modulation and demodulation,¹⁷ secondary sampling,¹⁸ and frequency shift scaling,^19,20 so that the signal can meet the necessary small-parameter requirements.

After solving the problem of small parameter limitation, scholars applied different potential function SR to the field of mechanical fault diagnosis. Lu et al.²¹ applied the Woods potential to the early fault diagnosis of bearings and improved the output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by adjusting the Woods-Saxon potential parameters. Moreover, the proposed method of this paper can adaptively match the input signal and yield better output results. Zhang et al.²² applied a Woods-Saxon potential combined with a Gauss potential model SR to bearing fault diagnosis and found that detection is significantly improved over that of the traditional stochastic resonance (TSR) method. López et al.²³ studied the application of SR based on the FitzHug-Nagumo potential in vibration signals of rolling bearings, and then used particle swarm optimization to optimize potential parameters to identify the optimal output SNR. Zhang and Yang²⁴ applied periodic adaptive SR to the diagnosis of bearing weak faults. The particle swarm optimization algorithm was then used to optimize the parameters and optimize the output SNR. Xiao et al.²⁵ applied single potential well SR to bearing fault diagnosis and then found the optimal parameters by an adaptive method to improve the output. Qiao et al.²⁶ applied piecewise bistable potential SR to extract early faults of rotating machinery. Their method exhibited a good anti-noise ability and enhanced the fault signal well. Li et al.²⁷ applied a multistable potential function to the fault diagnosis of rotating machinery, which can be transformed into a monostable or bistable potential function. The multistable state can detect both high-SNR signals and low-SNR signals. Shi et al.²⁸ applied tristable potential SR to fault diagnosis, finding that the energy of a fault signal can be increased and that the fault frequency can be identified with appropriate delay feedback parameters. All these methods have achieved good results in the field of early fault diagnosis of bearings. However, the method proposed in the studies mainly addressed application of overdamped SR in bearing fault diagnosis. Although the research on underdamped SR is relatively rare, some studies have been conducted. He et al.²⁹ proposed an exponential potential underdamped SR method to study the influence of potential parameters on the performance of SR systems under different output SNRs and noise intensities. Bearing fault experiments demonstrates that this method produces larger output SNR and higher fault characteristic peak values than those of the TSR method. The TSR method suffers from having small-parameter limitations, and because mechanical fault signals mostly appear in nonlinear forms, so the TSR method cannot directly extract the fault. Therefore, in this paper, an underdamped continuous potential stochastic resonance (UCPSR) method is proposed and applied to the early fault diagnosis of bearings. Compared with the time-delayed feedback stochastic resonance (TFSR) method, the new potential function in the proposed method is a continuous sinusoidal function with smooth particle transition and no interval. In addition, because of the existence of multiple potential function parameters, the potential structure is more comprehensive, and has more abundant characteristics. Thus, the output obtained is better than that of the TFSR.

The rest of this paper is arranged as follows. In section “Introduction of UCPSR Method,” the method is introduced, the change of potential function parameters to its shape is discussed, and the SNR is deduced. Section “Simulation illustration” uses the simulated bearing fault to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and compare it with the TFSR processing results. Section “Experimental verification” validates the effectiveness of the new method through experiments. Section “Engineering verification” validates the proposed method through engineering data. Section “Conclusion” summarizes the paper.

Introduction of UCPSR method

Continuous potential model

The occurrence of SR requires the optimal matching of periodic signal, noise and potential function in a nonlinear systems.³⁰ The potential model has a great impact on the system output. In this paper, the following continuous potential model is introduced

u (x) = - m ω_{0}^{2} {(\frac{a}{2 π})}^{2} \cos (\frac{2 π}{a} x)

(1)

In equation (1), m, a, and $ω$ are the parameters of the potential function. To explain the influence of these three parameters of the continuous potential function on the potential model more intuitively, diagrams of the influence of these parameters on the potential function are given in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Continuous potential function variation with respect to different parameters. (a) and (d) Parameters are set to m = 1, $ω = 1$ , to show the change of potential shape with respect to parameter a, (b) and (e) parameters set $ω = 1$ , a = π, to show the change of the potential shape with respect to parameter m, (c) and (f) set m = 1, a = 2π, to show the change of the potential shape with respect to the parameter $ω$ .

Figure 1(a) and (d) are two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphs, respectively, of the potential function with respect to the change of parameter a. It can be seen from Figure 1(a) that the potential function shifts to the right as parameter a increases. Owing to the inertia of the system, the particles can make better transitions, and it is easier to break through the barrier and obtain a better output. Figure 1(b) and (e) are two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphs, respectively, of the potential function with respect to the change of parameter m. The slope of the potential wall is changed by changing the potential function parameter m. The larger the value of m, the steeper the wall, and the more difficult it is for the particles to pass through the barrier. The smaller the value of m, the smaller both the barrier height and the depth of the well get. The height of the barrier is reduced, so the energy required for the transition between the two wells is further reduced. The noise and signal integrated energy are more easily transferred between the systems. The noise energy can then be more effectively converted into signal energy, making it possible for the fault signal to be amplified and for the noise to be suppressed. This results in a greatly improved system output SNR. Figure 1(c) and (f) show the two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphs, respectively, of the influence of potential parameter $ω$ on the potential function. The parameter $ω$ mainly affects the well depth and the barrier height. When $ω$ increases from 1.0 to 2.0, the well depth becomes greater, and the deeper the potential well depth, the more difficult particle transition becomes. When parameter $ω$ is changed from large to small, the barrier height is significantly reduced, making particle transitions easier. If the particles need less energy to cross the barrier, then less noise energy is needed to help achieve optimal output, and thus increases the system output SNR higher. The parameters m, a, and $ω$ are optimally matched to obtain the optimal output SNR by simply adjusting these parameters simultaneously. In addition, the potential function proposed in this paper is a sinusoidal function, which is itself continuous. The potential structure can then be optimized by adjusting the multiple parameters of the potential function, resulting in a better output than that produced by using the TFSR. When noise is introduced, the particles will jump over the barrier from the current potential well to another potential well. If the external noise is suitable, the large-scale transition is coordinated with the periodic driving force, transforming the traditionally random transition between the original two potential wells into an orderly transition consistent with the frequency of the periodic modulated signal. Optimal resonance output is then achieved.

Underdamped second-order SR model

The traditional SR is an overdamped SR, but an underdamped SR is equivalent to quadratic filtering, which offers better output. In this paper, the following continuous potential underdamped SR model is proposed to replace the traditional bistable SR model

\frac{d^{2} x}{d t^{2}} = - \frac{du (x)}{dx} - γ \frac{dx}{dt} + s (t) + N (t)

(2)

where $x (t)$ represents the system output signal, $s (t) = A \sin (2 π f_{d} t + φ)$ is a periodic signal, A is the signal amplitude, $f_{d}$ is the drive frequency, and $φ$ is its phase. $N (t) = \sqrt{2 D} ξ (t)$ is the background noise component, with $\sqrt{2 D}$ being the noise intensity and $ξ (t)$ the zero mean and unit difference of the Gaussian noise. Substituting equation (1) into equation (2) gives the UCPSR model, or equation (3)

\frac{d x^{2}}{d t^{2}} = \frac{m ω^{2} a}{2 π} \sin \frac{2 π}{a} x - γ y + A \cos (Ω t + φ) + \sqrt{2 D} ξ (t)

(3)

For simplicity of calculation, let $γ = 0$ , $φ = 0$ , $dx / dt = y$ , which results in equation

{\begin{matrix} \frac{dx}{dt} = y \\ \frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{m ω^{2} a}{2 π} \sin \frac{2 π}{a} x + A \cos (Ω t) + \sqrt{2 D} ζ (t) \end{matrix}

(4)

If we let $dy / dt = 0$ , $A = 0$ , $D = 0$ , $dx / dt = 0$ , and $m (ω_{0}^{2} a / 2 π) \sin (2 π / a) x = 0$ , we get $x = a / 2$ , $x = 0$ , and $x = - (a / 2)$ in $(- π, π)$ . So there are three singular points $(x_{+}, y_{+}) = ((a / 2), 0)$ , $(x_{0}, y_{0}) = (0, 0)$ and $(x_{-}, y_{-}) = (- (a / 2), 0)$ , where equation (4) is linearized at the singular points $(x_{-}, y_{-})$ , $(x_{+}, y_{+})$ , and the resulting singular value is $β_{1}, β_{2} = \pm \sqrt{- m ω_{0}^{2}}$ . Similarly, the singular value obtained by linearizing of equation (4) at the singular point $(0, 0)$ is $λ_{1, 2} = \pm \sqrt{- m ω^{2}}$ .

The probability density function of particle motion is equation (5)

\frac{\partial}{\partial t} ρ (x, y, t) = - \frac{\partial}{\partial x} [y (x, y, t)] - \frac{\partial}{\partial y} [f (x)] + D \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial y^{2}} ρ (x, y, t)

(5)

where $f (x) = (m ω_{0}^{2} a / 2 π) \sin (2 π / a) x + A \cos Ω t ρ (x, y, t)$ . According to the adiabatic approximation theory, the distribution function $ρ_{st} (x, y, t) = N \exp (- u (x, y, t) / D)$ is obtained, where N is the normalization constant and $u (x, y, t)$ is the generalized potential well function obtained by taking the small-parameter expansion³¹

u (x, y, t) = \frac{1}{2} y^{2} - (- m ω_{0}^{2} \cos \frac{2 π}{a} x - xA \cos (Ω t))

(6)

The probability of a particle transitioning between two potential wells can be expressed as

R_{\pm (t)} = \frac{\sqrt{β_{1} β_{2}}}{2 π} \sqrt{- \frac{λ_{1}}{λ_{2}}} \exp (\frac{- u (x_{0}, y_{0}, t) + u (x_{\pm}, y_{\pm}, t)}{D})

(7)

Substituting equation (6) into equation (7) results in

R_{\pm (t)} = \sqrt{\frac{β_{1} β_{2}}{2 π}} \sqrt{- \frac{λ_{1}}{λ_{2}}} \exp^{- \frac{m ω^{2}}{D}} \exp (\pm \frac{a}{2}) \frac{A}{D} \cos (Ω t)

(8)

We are then able to create equation (8) by utilizing Taylor’s expansion formula

R_{\pm (t)} = R_{0} [1 \mp \frac{a}{2} \frac{A}{D} \cos (Ω t) + \frac{1}{2} {(\frac{a}{2} \frac{A}{D})}^{2} \cos (Ω t) \mp \cdot \cdot \cdot]

(9)

where $R_{0} = (\sqrt{β_{1} β_{2}} / 2 π) \sqrt{- \frac{λ_{1}}{λ_{2}}} \exp (- m ω_{0}^{2})$ .

The system output power spectrum then becomes: $s (ω) = s (ω_{1}) + s (ω_{2})$ where $s (ω_{2})$ and $s (ω_{1})$ are the power spectra of the signal and noise, respectively. To simplify the representation of $s (ω_{2})$ and $s (ω_{1})$ , we define $R_{1} β = R_{0} (a / 2) (A / D)$ expressing $s (ω_{1})$ and $s (ω_{2})$ as

s (ω_{1}) = \frac{π a^{2} R_{1}^{2} β^{2}}{8 (R_{0} + 4 Ω^{2})} = \frac{a^{5} A^{2} \exp (\frac{- 2 m ω^{2}}{8 π D^{2}})}{8 (\frac{a}{2 π^{2}} \exp (\frac{- 2 m ω_{0}^{2}}{D}) + 4 Ω^{2})}

(10)

s (ω_{2}) = [1 - \frac{R_{1} β^{2}}{2 (R_{0}^{2} + 4 Ω^{2})}] \frac{a^{2} R_{0}}{2 (R_{0}^{2} + 4 Ω^{2})}

(11)

This makes it possible to obtain the output SNR as $SNR = \int_{0}^{\infty} s (ω_{1}) / s (ω_{2} = Ω)$ . We can then get the final SNR result after substituting into formulas (9) and (10)

\begin{matrix} SNR = \frac{s (ω_{1})}{s (ω_{2})} = \frac{\sqrt{2 a} a^{2} A^{2}}{32 D^{2}} \exp (\frac{- m ω_{0}^{2}}{D}) \\ {[1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2 π^{2}} \exp (- \frac{2 m ω_{0}^{2}}{D}) \frac{A^{2}}{D^{2}} \frac{a^{2}}{4}}{2 (\frac{a}{2 π^{2}} \exp (- \frac{2 m ω_{0}^{2}}{D}) + 4 Ω^{2})}]}^{- 1} \end{matrix}

(12)

According to the derivation of the SNR from equation (12). Figure 2 sets the relevant parameters as: $A = 0.005$ , $Ω = 0.002$ , $a = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5$ , and $D = (0.01, 5)$ . It can clearly be seen from the comparison of these three different values of parameter a that as the noise increases, the SNR increases sharply and begins to decrease slowly when the SNR reaches a peak.

Figure 2.

UCPSR system model.

Figure 3(b) shows the change of SNR by changing the size of parameter $ω$ . The SNR became larger with the decrease in parameter $ω$ , and under the same noise intensity, the output SNR obtained is higher as $ω$ decreases. Figure 3(c) shows the variation diagram of the SNR with respect to parameter m. It can be seen from the figure that the smaller m gets, the higher the SNR becomes. SR occurs when noise, periodic signal and nonlinear system are optimally matched. When the noise intensity D is held constant, it can be found that the system output SNR changes when the parameters m, a and $ω$ change. This shows that the magnitude of the SNR is affected by parameter variation, so the SNR output can be optimized by adjusting those parameters. When SR occurs, the particle can only jump into a potential well under the condition of low noise intensity. As the noise intensity increases, some particles will jump between potential wells. When the noise intensity continues to increase to the optimal value, the weak periodic signal will be significantly enhanced. However, when the noise intensity increases to a very high level, the periodic signal will be annihilated by the noise intensity and will not enhance the weak periodic signal. Therefore, as long as the noise intensity is appropriate, the particles in the nonlinear system can easily cross the barrier to enhance the weak periodic signal.

Figure 3.

Variation diagram of SNR based on parameters a, $ω$ , m: (a) is the variation diagram of SNR on parameters a, (b) is the variation diagram of SNR about parameter $ω$ , and (c) is the variation diagram of SNR about parameter m.

Fault diagnosis strategy for UCPSR weak signal

After discussing the continuous potential SR model and the output SNR, it is necessary to select appropriate parameters for the occurrence of SR, so that the system can reach the optimal matching point between the periodic signal and noise, thereby improving the output SNR of the system. We propose a UCPSR fault diagnosis strategy. The bearing fault signal is detected by the continuous potential SR method, and potential function parameters are optimized by the ant colony algorithm to improve signal output. The SNR is used to evaluate the output performance of the UCPSR method. The SNR is defined as

SNR = 10 \log_{10} (\frac{A_{d}}{A_{n}})

(13)

Where $A_{d}$ represents the drive frequency, $F_{d}$ ; $A_{n}$ corresponds to the maximum interference frequency, $F_{n}$ ; and the SNR magnitude represents the magnitude of the fault signature frequency relative to the noise interference. The detection process of the continuous potential function SR system is shown in Figure 4, and is described as follows:

Signal preprocessing. First, the envelope signal is obtained by Hilbert demodulation of the original signal. Then the envelope signal is frequency shifted and scaled to meet the requirements of small parameters.

Parameter initialization. The damping factor is fixed and the ranges of m, a, and $ω$ are set in the continuous potential function.

Output calculation. First, the fourth-order Runge-Kutta is used to solve the equation (4) and the output waveform is obtained. Then the output SNR of the system is calculated by using equation (13).

Output evaluation. The continuous potential model is combined with the ant colony algorithm to search for the optimal values of the potential parameters m, a, and $ω$ to obtain the highest SNR. Then the parameters are checked to ascertain whether they are out of the setting range. If the range is exceeded, return to the second step to increase the parameter optimization range. Otherwise, the system output is obtained.

Signal post-processing. The optimal parameters are substituted into the potential model to obtain the optimal output. The fault characteristic frequency is identified by performing a Fourier transform analysis of the signal spectrum.

Figure 4.

UCPSR fault diagnosis strategy.

Simulation illustration

To verify the validity of the continuous potential function SR method, we performed simulation. First, we constructed a bearing fault signal by using the following equation

s (t) = A \sin (2 π f t) \cdot \exp {- d {[t - n (t) T_{d}]}^{2}} + \sqrt{2 D} ξ (t)

(14)

where A is the amplitude of the simulated signal, f is the modulation frequency, and d is the signal attenuation rate. $T_{d}$ is the pulse time, $\sqrt{2 D}$ is the intensity of the added noise, and $ξ (t)$ is the zero mean unit variance of the Gaussian white noise. The sampling time was set to 1 s.

Figure 5 shows the signal simulation results: Figure 5(a) shows a clean signal with obvious periodic components. Figure 5(b) shows the signal after noise is added. The periodic signal is severely annihilated by the noise and no information can be discerned. Figure 5(c) shows the signal spectrum obtained by performing a Fast Fourier transform (FFT), but still no useful information can be revealed. Figure 5(d) shows the envelope spectrum obtained after performing a Hilbert demodulation.

Figure 5.

Simulated bearing signal: (a) the clean periodic signal, (b) signal after noise is added, (c) the spectrogram, and (d) the envelope spectrum.

To illustrate the superiority of the UCPSR method, the Hilbert-demodulated envelope signal was frequency shifted and scaled to meet the requirements of small parameters. Then it was processed by using the TFSR³² method, and the parameters in the potential function were optimized by the ant colony algorithm to obtain the optimal output SNR of 20.3322 dB. The TFSR time-domain diagram is show in Figure 6(a) and (b) is the TFSR spectrum. From Figure 6(b), it can be clearly seen that the fault characteristic frequency is 43 Hz that its peak value is 0.1123, thus the fault is clearly identified. It can be seen from Figure 6(b) that the noise component of the high-frequency part is obviously reduced, but the noise interference of the part near the fault characteristic frequency has certain influence on fault identification. Consequently, the signal was also processed by using the UCPSR method, and the output SNR was found to be 26.06 dB.

Figure 6.

(a) Time-domain signal processed by using the TFSR, (b) spectrum processed by using the TFSR, (c) time-domain map processed by using UCPSR method, and (d) spectrum processed by using UCPSR method.

Figure 6(c) shows the time-domain waveform of UCPSR processing, and Figure 6(d) shows the spectrum of UCPSR processing. We compare the results of UCPSR with those of TFSR. By comparing Figure 6(d) with Figure 6(b), it can be seen that there is almost no noise interference in the low-frequency range of the spectrum processed by using the UCPSR method, and the fault characteristic frequency is 43 Hz and the peak value of the fault characteristic is 0.3667. The difference between the peak value of the fault and the peak value of the maximum noise(the recognition degree of fault feature) is 0.1995, which is an increase of 0.045 compared with the result of TFSR method. The noise component around the fault peak is significantly less than that of the TFSR method. From the above analysis, we can see that the effect of UCPSR method is more effective than the TFSR method.

Experimental verification

Rolling bearings are widely used in practical applications. However, long-term rotation will cause wear of a bearing’s inner ring, outer ring, or rolling element, all of which will affect the normal operation of the machine. To better identify early weak bearing faults, the proposed continuous potential function SR method was applied to fault feature extraction, and the results were compared with the TFSR method. We analyzed a set of inner rings fault data, and the experimental data were taken from a comprehensive test bench used for mechanical equipment fault diagnosis (see Figure 7). Three acceleration sensors, horizontal, vertical, and axial, are arranged in the bearing seat of the test bed to collect experimental data. In this experiment, the bearing model is the rolling bearing ER-12 K, the number of roller is 8, the rolling element diameter is 7.9375 mm, the bearing pitch diameter is 33.5 mm, and the pressure angle is $α = 0^{°}$ . The sampling frequency is set to 5120 Hz, the rotational speed is 2100 r/min, the sampling time is set to 1 s, and the characteristic frequency of the bearing inner ring fault is obtained by equation (15)

f_{s} = \frac{z}{2} \times (1 + \frac{d}{D} \cos α) f_{r}

(15)

Figure 7.

Mechanical comprehensive fault test bench.

In the equation (15), z is the number of rolling elements, d is the diameter of the rolling element, D is the pitch diameter, $α$ is the contact angle, and $f_{r}$ is the rotational speed (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Experimental verification of faulty bearing parts.

The time-domain diagram, frequency spectrum and envelope spectrum of the original signal obtained by using traditional signal analysis are shown in Figure 9. Because the signal is heavily covered by noise, the fault characteristic frequency cannot be seen from the time-domain diagram and frequency spectrum, while the fault characteristic frequency can be found from the envelope spectrum by Hilbert demodulation, but there is a lot of noise around the fault feature, so the fault cannot be accurately identified. The TFSR method was applied to extract fault features of rolling bearings. The output time-domain and spectrum diagrams are shown in Figure 10. The pulse contour caused by the fault characteristic frequencies is obviously enhanced in Figure 10(a). From Figure 10(b), it is clear that the characteristic frequency of the fault is 172 Hz, and that the peak value of the fault is 0.1016, which is much higher than the peak value of the surrounding noise, and that the high-frequency noise signal is significantly reduced. The TFSR method successfully extracts the characteristic frequency of the fault. The difference between the peak value of the fault and the peak value of the noise is 0.06874. However, some noise interference at the low frequency affects the accuracy of fault extraction. In order to illustrate the advantages of the UCPSR method, we investigated the effectiveness of UCPSR and TFSR. Figure 10(c) and (d) show the time domain and frequency spectrum obtained, respectively, by using UCPSR. From Figure 10(d), the characteristic frequency of the fault can be clearly found. The peak value of the fault is 0.1626, and the difference between the peak value of the fault and that of the noise is 0.118. Compared with the TFSR, the recognition degree of the fault characteristic frequency is higher, and the noise interference near the fault characteristic frequency is smaller. This fully proves that the UCPSR method offer better fault diagnosis effect than TFSR method.

Figure 9.

Vibration signal of bearing inner race: (a) time-domain diagram of the signal, (b) spectrogram, and (c) envelope spectrum.

Figure 10.

(a) Time-domain diagram processed by using TFSR method, (b) spectrum diagram processed by TFSR method, (c) time-domain diagram processed by using the UCPSR, and (d) spectrum diagram processed by using the UCPSR method.

Engineering verification

The new method has achieved good results in the bearing test verification and the following presents the engineering verification of the new proposed method. A tension roll reducer in a steel mill and the engineering equipment are shown in Figure 11. The bearing fault characteristic frequency is 38 Hz, and the sampling frequency is 2560 Hz. The results obtained by using the UCPSR are compared with those from TFSR method. Figure 12 shows the inner race of the factory fault bearing. Figure 13 shows the time-domain diagram, spectrum and envelope spectrum of the engineering signal. From the time domain and the spectrum, we cannot identify any useful information. Although the fault characteristic frequency can be found in the envelope spectrum, there are a lot of noise components around the fault characteristic frequency, so it is impossible to judge the fault. We use the TFSR method to process the fault data and optimize the parameters by using the ant colony algorithm to get the optimal output results as shown in Figure 14(a) and (b). From the spectrum in Figure 14(b), we can clearly identify the fault characteristic frequency. But the low-frequency part contains some noise components, which impact fault feature extraction. Therefore, the UCPSR method was used to process the signal, and the results are shown in Figure 14(c) and (d). In the time-domain of UCPSR Figure 14(c), it can be seen that the signal pulse profile is obviously enhanced. Comparing spectrum of Figure 14(d) and (b), we find that the noise component near the fault characteristic frequency is significantly reduced, and that the difference between the fault characteristic peak value and the noise peak value is 0.7645, which is larger than the difference between TFSR method fault peak value and its noise peak value of 0.12177, which has better fault recognition degree. This demonstrates that the new method is superior to TFSR methods and traditional signal analysis methods in engineering signal verification.

Figure 11.

Tension roll reducer for a steel mill.

Figure 12.

Engineering verification of faulty bearings.

Figure 13.

Engineering data signal diagram: (a) time-domain signal, (b) spectrogram and (c) envelope spectrum.

Figure 14.

(a) Time-domain diagram of TFSR method, (b) spectrogram of TFSR method, (c) time-domain diagram of UCPSR method and (d) spectrogram of UCPSR method.

Conclusion

In this paper, a method of continuous potential second-order underdamped SR method is proposed and applied to early fault diagnosis of bearings. The new method can extract clear fault features from heavy background noise signals. Based on simulation and experimental verification, the following conclusions are as follows:

Because the traditional SR method is a first-order differential equation, the first-order model is equivalent to a filter link, whereas the proposed method is a second-order under-damped stochastic resonance method, and the second-order differential equation is equivalent to a second-order filter, so the second-order stochastic resonance model offers improved filtering effect.

The second-order SR is equivalent to secondary filtering, so the second-order underdamped continuous potential SR offers improved denoising compared to the traditional first-order SR. When the potential parameters are at a certain values, the system will reach its optimal output, and the parameters of the potential function can be optimized by the ant colony algorithm to obtain the maximum output SNR. The potential model is rich, and it can match with complex signals.

In this method, the ant colony algorithm is used to optimize the potential parameters, and the optimal parameters are obtained more quickly. Then the optimal output SNR is obtained for the SR system.

The effectiveness of the proposed method has achieved effective results in extracting weak fault signals of rolling bearings at an early stage. Given the method’s rapid fault identification and good accuracy, it is expected to be widely used in detecting weak periodic signals with heavy background noise, and it can be applied to early weak fault detection of rotating machinery such as planetary gearboxes at later stages.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Wang

Liu

CX.

Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods for low-speed and heavy-load slewing bearings: a literature review. J Vibroeng 2017; 19: 3429–3444.

Zhou

Wang

, et al. Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of motor bearings using undersampled vibration signals from a wireless sensor network. J Sound Vib 2018; 414: 81–96.

Glowacz

Fault detection of electric impact drills and coffee grinders using acoustic signals. Sensors 2019; 269: 65–80.

Song

Yan

RQ.

Bearing fault diagnosis based on cluster-contraction stage-wise orthogonal-matching-pursuit. Measurement 2019; 140: 240–253.

Luo

Tian

, et al. Realization of convolution wavelet transformation and its application in mechanical incipient fault diagnosis. J Vib Shock 2013; 32: 64–69.

Upadhyay

Kankar

PK.

Diagnosis of bearing defects using tunable Q-wavelet transform. J Mech Sci Technol 2018; 32: 549–558.

Dong

Ding

EJ.

Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using modified LFDA and EMD with sensitive feature selection. IEEE Access 2018; 99: 3715–3730.

Cai

Yang

Pan

EMD and GNN-ADABOOST fault diagnosis for urban rail train rolling bearings. Discrete Cont Dyn-S 2019; 12: 1471–1487.

Jiang

, et al. Recent progress on decoupling diagnosis of hybrid failures in gear transmission systems using vibration sensor signal: a review. Measurement 2016; 90: 4–19.

10.

Wang

Guo

Gao

, et al. Fault detection method of a sun gear based on windowed synchronous average in angle domain. J Vib Shock 2017; 36: 74–79.

11.

Caesarendra

Pratama

Kosasih

, et al. Parsimonious network based on a fuzzy Inference system (PANFIS) for time series feature prediction of low speed slew bearing prognosis. Appl Sci 2018; 8: 2656.

12.

Wang

Jia

Kou

, et al. Spectral kurtosis entropy and weighted SaE-ELM for bogie fault diagnosis under variable conditions. Sensors 2018; 18: 1705–1707.

13.

Gammaitoni

Hänggi

Jung

, et al. Stochastic resonance: a remarkable idea that changed our perception of noise. Eur Phys J B 2009; 69(1): 1–3.

14.

Buchin

Rieubland

Häusser

, et al. Inverse stochastic resonance in cerebellar Purkinje cells. PLoS Comput Biol 2016; 12: e1005000.

15.

Chen

Brennan

, et al. Stochastic resonance in a nonlinear mechanical vibration isolation system. J Sound Vib 2016; 370: 221–229.

16.

Zhou

Sun

Zhou

, et al. Stochastic effects in the planet migration and orbital distribution of the Kuiper Belt. Mon Not R Astron Soc 2010; 336(2): 520–526.

17.

Ren

Wang

, et al. A generalized demodulation and Hilbert transform based signal decomposition method. Shock Vib 2017; 2017: 7286946.

18.

Chi

Kang

Zhang

, et al. Effect of scale-varying fractional-order stochastic resonance by simulation and its application in bearing diagnosis. Int J Model Simul Sci Comput 2019; 10: 1941003.

19.

Jia

Yang

Liu

, et al. Improving amplitude-modulated signals by re-scaled and twice sampling vibrational resonance methods. Pramana 2018; 91: 38.

20.

Liu

Leng

Lai

, et al. Multi-frequency signal detection based on frequency exchange and re-scaling stochastic resonance and its application to weak fault diagnosis. Sensors 2018; 18: 1325.

21.

Kong

FR.

Stochastic resonance with Woods–Saxon potential for rolling element bearing fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2014; 45(2): 488–503.

22.

Zhang

, et al. Stochastic resonance with a joint Woods-Saxon and Gaussian potential for bearing fault diagnosis. Math Probl Eng 2014; 2014: 315901.

23.

López

Zhong

, et al. Stochastic resonance in an underdamped system with FitzHug-Nagumo potential for weak signal detection. J Sound Vib 2017; 411: 34–46.

24.

Zhang

Yang

Bearing fault diagnosis by SR method in periodical potential system. Chin J Eng 2017.

25.

Xiao

Jiang

, et al. Multi-frequency periodic weak signal detection based on single-well potential stochastic resonance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2016 Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China, 28–30 May 2016.

26.

Qiao

Lei

Lin

An adaptive unsaturated bistable stochastic resonance method and its application in mechanical fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2017; 84: 731–746.

27.

Chen

ZJ.

Multi-stable stochastic resonance and its application research on mechanical fault diagnosis. J Sound Vib 2013; 332(22): 5999–6015.

28.

Shi

Yuan

Han

, et al. Stochastic resonance in a time-delayed feedback tristable system and its application in fault diagnosis. J Sound Vib 2018; 424: 1–14.

29.

Cao

Zhang

, et al. Weak signal detection based on underdamped stochastic resonance with an exponential bistable potential. Chin J Phys 2018; 56: 1588–1598.

30.

Lai

Leng

YG.

Weak-signal detection based on the stochastic resonance of bistable Duffing oscillator and its application in incipient fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2016; 81: 60–74.

31.

Stochastic force and nonlinear system. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Publishing House, 1994.

32.

Zhang

HB.

Enhanced rotating machine fault diagnosis based on time-delayed feedback stochastic resonance. J Vib Acoust 2015; 137: 051008.

Application of continuous potential function stochastic resonance in early fault diagnosis of rolling bearings

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Introduction of UCPSR method

Continuous potential model

Underdamped second-order SR model

Fault diagnosis strategy for UCPSR weak signal

Simulation illustration

Experimental verification

Engineering verification

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

References