This examination of data from the 1987–88 Schools and Staffing Survey challenges the common supposition that most teachers oppose merit pay. The authors find that teachers in districts that use merit pay do not seem demoralized by the system or hostile toward it, and teachers of disadvantaged and low-achieving students are generally supportive of merit pay. Private school teachers favor merit pay more than do public school teachers, a difference that may reflect differences in management in the two sectors and a more entrepreneurial spirit among staff in private schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BacharachSamuel B., 1984. Paying for Better Teaching: Merit Pay and Its Alternatives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Organizational Analysis and Practice, Inc.
2.
BallouDalePodgurskyMichael. 1994 (forthcoming). “The Structure of Pay in Private Schools: Are There Lessons for Public Schools?”Journal of Human Resources.
3.
BrandtRichard M.1990. Incentive Pay and Career Ladders for Today 's Teachers: A Study of Current Programs and Practices. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
CalhounFrederich S.ProtheroeNancy J., 1983. Merit Pay Plans for Teachers: Status and Descriptions. Arlington, Va.: Educational Research Service.
5.
CornettLynn. 1987. “More Pay for Teachers and Administrators Who Do More: Incentive Pay Programs, 1987.”Career Ladder Clearinghouse. Atlanta, Ga.: Southern Regional Education Board, December.
CornettLynn. 1991. “Linking Performance to Rewards for Teachers, Principals, and Schools.”Career Ladder Clearinghouse. Atlanta, Ga.: Southern Regional Education Board, January.
8.
CramerJerome. 1983. “Yes—Merit Pay Can Be a Horror, but a Few School Systems Have Done It Right.”American School Board Journal, Vol. 170, No. 9 (September), pp. 28–34.
9.
Darling-HammondLindaBarnettBerry. 1988. The Evolution of Teacher Policy. Santa Monica, Calif.: The RAND Corporation.
10.
ElamStanley M.1989. “The Second Gallup/Phi Delta Kappa Poll of Teachers' Attitudes Toward the Public Schools.”Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 70, No. 10 (June), pp. 785–98.
11.
FeistritzerC. Emily. 1990. Profile of Teachers in the U.S.—1990. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Information.
12.
FreemanRichard. “Union Wage Practices and Wage Dispersion Within Establishments.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 36, No. 1 (October), pp. 3–21.
13.
GallupA.1984. “The Gallup Poll of Teachers' Attitudes Toward the Public Schools.”Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 66, No. 2 (October), pp. 97–107.
14.
GreeneWilliam. 1990. Econometric Analysis. New York: McMillan.
15.
HatryHarry P.GreinerJohn H., 1985. Issues and Case Studies in Teacher Incentive Plans. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
16.
HenemanRobert L.1990. “Merit Pay Research.” In FerrisG.RowlandK., eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 203–63.
17.
JohnsonSusan M.1986. “Incentives for Teachers: What Motivates, What Matters.”Educational Administration Ouarterly, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 54–79.
18.
McDonnellLorraine M.1989. The Dilemma of Teacher Policy. Santa Monica, Calif.: The RAND Corporation.
19.
MatthesW. A., 1990. “Teacher Beliefs Regarding Career Ladders and Merit Pay.”Education, Vol. 110, No. 4 (Summer), pp. 535–40.
20.
MiddletonEmogene S.1989. “The Teacher Career Ladder Program: Georgia Teachers' Stance.”Education, Vol. 110, No. 2 (Winter), pp. 170–78.
21.
MurnaneRichard J.CohenDavid K., 1986. “Merit Pay and the Evaluation Problem: Why Most Merit Pay Plans Fail and a Few Survive.”Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 56, No. 1 (February), pp. 1–17.
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. 1991. Data Tape Available for 1987–88 Schools and Staffing Survey Public and Private School Teacher Questionnaires. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
23.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
24.
NortonM. ScottHegebushWilliam W., 1988. “Incentive Pay Programs: Does Participation Change Viewpoints?”The Clearing House, Vol. 62, No. 4 (December), pp. 149–51.
25.
PorwollPaul J.1979. Merit Pay for Teachers. Arlington, Va.: Educational Research Service.
26.
RistMarilee C.1983. “Our Nationwide Poll: Most Teachers Endorse the Merit Pay Concept.”American School Board Journal, Vol. 170, No. 9 (September), pp. 23–27.
27.
TochT.1991. In the Name of Excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
UrbanWayne J.1985. “Old Wine, Old Bottles? Merit Pay and Organized Teachers.” In JohnsonH. C.Jr., ed., Merit, Money, and Teachers' Careers. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
29.
UzellLawrence A.1983. Where Is the ‘Merit’ in New Merit-Pay Plans?Education Week, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Sept. 14), p. 24.
30.
WeberLarry. 1988. “An Instrument for Assessing Attitudes Toward Merit Pay.”Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 2–7.
