Financial precarity—the persistent worry about one’s financial situation—can have detrimental effects on individuals’ cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. It can also interfere with work performance. The authors report on a two-year field intervention aimed at addressing financial precarity through the implementation of an employee emergency savings program. The program was employer-sponsored but required voluntary employee participation in the form of a weekly payroll deduction. Results showed that program participants accrued more in emergency savings than non-participants, and that for more financially precarious employees, participation in the program was associated with improved work performance. Supplemental analysis showed that participation in the program, and the enhanced savings associated with it, buffered employees from financial shocks that might otherwise have interfered with their performance at work. Thus, the program offered benefits to employees in the form of enhanced short-term savings, and to the employer in the form of enhanced work performance. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for employee financial wellness initiatives.
AckermanNorleenPaolucciBeatrice. 1983. Objective and subjective income adequacy: Their relationship to perceived life quality measures. Social Indicators Research12(1):25–48.
2.
AngristJoshua D.KruegerAlan B.2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiment. Journal of Economic Perspectives15(4):69–85.
Anvari-ClarkJeffreyAnsongDavid. 2022. Predicting financial well-being using the financial capability perspective: The roles of financial shocks, income volatility, financial products, and savings behavior. Journal of Family and Economic Issues43:730–43.
5.
ArgentoRobertBryantVictoria L.SabelhausJohn. 2015. Early withdrawals from retirement accounts during the Great Recession. Contemporary Economic Policy33(1):1–16.
6.
AustinPeter C.2008. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety17(12):1218–25.
7.
AustinPeter C.2009. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine28(25):3083–107.
8.
AustinPeter C.2010. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. American Journal of Epidemiology172(9):1092–97.
9.
AustinPeter C.2011. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research46(3):399–424.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A.1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6):1173–82.
12.
BelloniAlexandreChernozhukovVictorHansenChristian. 2014. Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Review of Economic Studies81(2):608–50.
13.
BeshearsJohnChoiJames J.IwryJ. MarkJohnDavid C.LaibsonDavidMadrianBrigitte C.2020. Building emergency savings through employer-sponsored rainy-day savings accounts. Tax Policy and the Economy34(1):43–90.
BommerWilliam H.JohnsonJonathan L.RichGregory A.PodsakoffPhilip M.MacKenzieScott B.1995. On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology48(3):587–605.
16.
BrookhartM. AlanSchneeweissSebastianRothmanKenneth J.GlynnRobert J.AvornJerryStürmerTil. 2006. Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology163(12):1149–56.
17.
CaliendoMarcoMahlstedtRobertMitnikOscar A.2017. Unobservable, but unimportant? The relevance of usually unobserved variables for the evaluation of labor market policies. Labour Economics46:14–25.
18.
CarrollGabriel D.ChoiJames J.LaibsonDavidMardianBrigitteMetrickAndrew. 2009. Optimal defaults and active decisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics124(4):1639–74.
19.
CatalanoRalphGoldman-MellorSidraSaxtonKatherineMargerison-ZilkoClaireSubbaramanMeenakshiLeWinnKajaAndersonElizabeth. 2011. The health effects of economic decline. Annual Review of Public Health32:431–50.
20.
ChenGiladGullyStanley M.EdenDov. 2001. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods4(1):62–83.
ForthJohnMcNabbRobert. 2008. Workplace performance: A comparison of subjective and objective measures in the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. Industrial Relations39(2):104–23.
23.
GasiorowskaAgata. 2014. The relationship between objective and subjective wealth is moderated by financial control and mediated by money anxiety. Journal of Economic Psychology43:64–74.
24.
GierkBenjaminKohlmannSebastianKroenkeKurtSpangenbergLenaZengerMarkusBrählerElmarLöweBernd. 2014. The Somatic Symptom Scale–8 (SSS-8): A brief measure of somatic symptom burden. JAMA Internal Medicine174(3):399–407.
HoDanielImaiKosukeKingGaryStuartElizabeth A.2011. MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software42(8):1–28.
27.
KaurSupreetMullainathanSendhilOhSuannaSchilbachFrank. 2024. Do financial concerns make workers less productive?Quarterly Journal of Economics140(1):635–89.
28.
KroenkeKurtSpitzerRobert L.WilliamsJanet B.2001. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine16(9):606–13.
LeanaCarrie R.MeurisJirs. 2015. Living to work and working to live: Income as a driver of organizational behavior. Academy of Management Annals9(1):55–95.
31.
LeanaCarrie R.MeurisJirsLambertonCait. 2018. More than a feeling: The role of empathetic care in promoting safety in health care. ILR Review71(2):394–425.
32.
MacKinnonDavid P.FairchildAmanda J.FritzMatthew S.2007. Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology58:593–614.
MeurisJirsLeanaCarrie R.2018. The price of financial precarity: Organizational costs of employees’ financial concerns. Organization Science29(3):398–417.
NetemeyerRichardWarmathDeeFernandesDanielLynchJohn. 2018. How am I doing? Perceived financial well-being, it’s potential antecedents, and its relation to overall well-being. Journal of Consumer Research45(1):68–89.
OngWei J.2022. Gender-contingent effects of leadership on loneliness. Journal of Applied Psychology107(7):1180–202.
41.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F.2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers36:717–31.
42.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B.1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika70(1):41–55.
43.
RosseelYves. 2012. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Journal of Statistical Software48(2):1–36.
ShahBajiu R.LaupacisAndreasHuxJanet E.AustinPeter C.2005. Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology58(6):550–59.
46.
SteinerPeter M.CookThomas D.ShadishWilliam R.ClarkMargaret H.2010. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods15(3):250–67.
47.
StuartElizabeth A.2010. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science25(1):1–21.
48.
StuartElizabeth A.RubinDonald B.2008. Best practices in quasi-experimental designs. In OsborneJ.W. (Ed.), Best Practices in Quantitative Methods, pp. 155–76. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
49.
ThalerRichard H.1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making12(3):183–206.
ViseuJoãoLealRitade JesusSaúl N.PintoPatríciaPechorroPedroGreenglassEsther. 2018. Relationship between economic stress factors and stress, anxiety, and depression: Moderating role of social support. Psychiatry Research268:102–7.
52.
ZhangYiwei C.SussmanAbigail B.2017. The role of mental accounting in household spending and investing decisions. In ChaffinCharles R. (Ed.), Client Psychology. New York: Wiley.
53.
ZhaoJiayongTommBrandon. 2017. Attentional trade-offs under resource scarcity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science10285:78–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
