The authors investigate how race and political partisanship affected variations in workplace and non-workplace mobility at three COVID-19 phases—lockdown (2020), reopening (2021), and endemic COVID (2022). They theorize that structural racism compelled relatively greater workplace mobility rates in Black communities during lockdown, and reduced Black workplace mobility during reopening and endemic COVID. By contrast, they posit elite-level anti-science skepticism and its amplification resulted in Trump-voting communities experiencing relatively higher workplace and non-workplace mobility rates than non-Trump-voting areas throughout the pandemic. Regressions primarily using county-level Google Mobility Reports data support the hypotheses, conditioning on state-level fixed effects and county-level urbanity, COVID job-type sorting, demographics, and socioeconomics. The county-level results are complemented by outcomes from novel individual-level COVID lockdown survey data, helping connect the proposed individual-level mechanisms to the county-level findings. The authors conclude that work mobility during COVID was racialized and politicized, offering empirical insights into how systematic disadvantages can lead to increased and unequal precarity during periods of acute economic or social crisis.
AktayAhmetBavadekarShaileshCossoulGwenDavisJohnDesfontainesDamienFabrikantAlexGabrilovichEvgeniy, et al. 2020. Google COVID-19 community mobility reports: Anonymization process description (version 1.1). Accessed February 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04145
BentonRichard A.CobbJ. AdamWernerTimothy. 2022. Firm partisan positioning, polarization, and risk communication: Examining voluntary disclosures on COVID-19. Strategic Management Journal43(4):697–723.
4.
BlauFrancine D.KoebeJosefineMeyerhoferPamela A.2021. Who are the essential and frontline workers?Business Economics56(3):168–78.
5.
BleeKathleen M.CreasapKimberly A.2010. Conservative and right-wing movements. Annual Review of Sociology36(1):269–86.
6.
BloomNicholasFletcherRobert S.YehEthan. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on US firms. NBER Working Paper No. 28314. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
CechErin A.HiltnerSofia. 2022. Unsettled employment, reshuffled priorities? Career prioritization among college-educated workers facing employment instability during COVID-19. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World8:1–13.
8.
ClintonJoshua D.CohenJonLapinskiJohnTrusslerMarc. 2021. Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19. Science Advances7(2):1–7.
9.
ConwayLucian GideonIIIWoodardShailee R.ZubrodAliviaChanLinus. 2021. Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations. Personality and Individual Differences183:111124.
10.
CortesGuido MatiasForsytheEliza. 2023. Heterogeneous labor market impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. ILR Review76(1):30–55.
11.
CouchKenneth A.FairlieRobert W.2010. Last hired, first fired? Black-white unemployment and the business cycle. Demography47(1):227–47.
12.
CouchKenneth A.FairlieRobert W.XuHuanan. 2020. Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment. Journal of Public Economics192:104287.
13.
DeyMatthewFrazisHarleyLoewensteinMark A.SunHugette. 2020. Ability to work from home: Evidence from two surveys and implications for the labor market in the COVID-19 pandemic. Monthly Labor Review, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, June.
14.
DiasFelipe A.2021. The racial gap in employment and layoffs during COVID-19 in the United States: A visualization. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World8:1–3.
15.
DobbinsTonyJohnstoneStewartKahancovaMartaLamareJ. RyanWilkinsonAdrian. 2023. Comparative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on work and employment—Why industrial relations institutions matter. Industrial Relations (Advance online publication).
16.
DrakeThomas M.DochertyAnnemarie B.WeiserThomas G.YuleStevenSheikhAzizHarrisonEwan M.2020. The effects of physical distancing on population mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. The Lancet2(8):E385–E387.
17.
EgedeLeonard E.WalkerRebekah J.2020. Structural racism, social risk factors, and Covid 19—A dangerous convergence for Black Americans. New England Journal of Medicine383(12):e77.
FloresAlexandraColeJennifer C.DickertStephanEomKiminJiga-BoyGabriela M.KogutTehilaLoriaRiley, et al. 2022. Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries. PNAS119(3):1–7.
23.
ForsytheElizaKahnLisa B.LangeFabianWiczerDavid. 2020. Labor demand in the time of COVID-19: Evidence from vacancy postings and UI claims. Journal of Public Economics189:104238.
24.
FreemanRichard B.1973. Changes in the labor market for Black Americans, 1948–1972. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1: 67–131.
25.
GauchatGordon. 2012. Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review77(2):167–87.
26.
GeziciArmaganOzayOzge. 2020. An intersectional analysis of COVID-19 unemployment. Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy3(4):270–81.
27.
HartP. SolChinnSedonaSorokaStuart. 2020. Politicization and polarization in COVID 19 news coverage. Science Communication42(5):679–97.
HooperMonica WebbNapolesAnna MariaPerez-StableEliseo J.2020. COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities. JAMA323(24):2466–67.
30.
KaneJoseph W.TomerAdie. 2021. Valuing human infrastructure: Protecting and investing in essential workers during the COVID-19 era. Public Works Management & Policy26(1):34–46.
31.
KramerGerald H.1983. The ecological fallacy revisited: Aggregate- versus individual-level findings on economics and elections, and sociotropic voting. American Political Science Review77(1):92–111.
32.
LeKienNguyenMy. 2021. The psychological consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns. International Review of Applied Economics35(2):147–63.
33.
LeeTamara L.TapiaMaite. 2021. Confronting race and other social identity erasures: The case for critical industrial relations theory. ILR Review74(3):637–62.
34.
MasonPatrick L.2023. The Economics of Structural Racism: Stratification Economics and US Labor Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
McLamoreQuinnehtukqutSyropoulosStylianosLeidnerBernhardHirschbergerGiladYoungKevinZeinRizqy AmeliaBaumertAnna, et al. 2022. Trust in scientific information mediates associations between conservatism and coronavirus responses in the U.S., but few other nations. Scientific Reports12(1):1–15.
MongeySimonPilossophLauraWeinbergAlexander. 2021. Which workers bear the burden of social distancing?Journal of Economic Inequality19:509–26.
38.
MooneyChris. 2005. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
39.
MundasadSmitha. 2020. Black people “twice as likely to catch coronavirus.”BBC News, November12. Accessed February 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54907473
[NCLC] National Consumer Law Center. 2020. A looming crisis: Black communities at greatest risk of COVID-19 foreclosure. July. Accessed February 2023, https://www.nclc.org/news-archive/issue briefs.html
PhelanJo C.LinkBruce G.2015. Is racism a fundamental cause of inequalities in health?Annual Review of Sociology41: 311–30.
44.
PintoSanjay. 2022. Racial capitalism at work: Evidence from a COVID-era survey. In LeeTamara L.Davis-FaulknerSheriWilliamsNaomi R.TapiaMaite (Eds.), A Racial Reckoning in Industrial Relations: Storytelling as Revolution from Within, Ch. 6, pp. 83–109. Champaign, IL: Labor and Employment Relations Association, published as an imprint of Cornell University Press.
RayVictor. 2019. A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review84(1):26–53.
47.
RhoHye JinRiordanChristineIbsenChristian LyhneLamareJ. RyanTapiaMaite. 2023. Do workers speak up when feeling job insecure? Examining workers’ response to precarity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Work and Occupations50(1):97–129.
48.
RussoLuana. 2017. The use of aggregate data in the study of voting behavior: Ecological inference, ecological fallacy and other applications. In FisherJustinFieldhouseEdwardFranklinMark N.GibsonRachelCantijochMartaWlezienChristopher (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion, Ch. 38, pp. 485–95. London: Routledge.
49.
ScovilleCalebMcCumberAndrewAmironeseiRazvanJeonJune. 2022. Mask refusal backlash: The politicization of face masks in the American public sphere during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius8:1–22.
50.
SeghanNeil J.YueDahaiPopeElleWangRen HaoRobyDylan H.2022. The association between COVID-19 and the county-level partisan divide in the United States. Health Affairs41(6):853–63.
StroebeWolfgangvanDellenMichelle R.AbakoumkinGeorgiosLemay Jr.Edward P.Jr.SchiavoneWilliam M.AgostiniMaximilianBélangerJocelyn J., et al. 2021. Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence. PLoS ONE16(10):1–22.
53.
WassmerRobert W.2023. Past structural racism and present home prices. Journal of Urban Affairs (Advance online publication).
54.
YancyClyde W.2020. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA323(19):1891–92.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
