The authors provide a comprehensive overview of codetermination, that is, worker representation in firms’ governance and management. The available micro evidence points to zero or small positive effects of codetermination on worker and firm outcomes and leaves room for moderate positive effects on productivity, wages, and job stability. The authors also present new country-level, general-equilibrium event studies of codetermination reforms between the 1960s and 2010s, finding no effects on aggregate economic outcomes or the quality of industrial relations. They offer three explanations for the institution’s limited impact. First, existing codetermination laws convey little authority to workers. Second, countries with codetermination laws have high baseline levels of informal worker voice. Third, codetermination laws may interact with other labor market institutions, such as union representation and collective bargaining. The article closes with a discussion of the implications for recent codetermination proposals in the United States.
AdamJulian. 2019. Voluntary quits: Do works councils matter? An analysis of the reform of the German Works Constitution Act 2001. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik239(1): 67–109.
2.
AdamsZoeBishopLouiseDeakinSimon. 2016. CBR Labor Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
3.
AddisonJohn T.2009. The Economics of Codetermination: Lessons from the German Experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
AddisonJohn T.SchankThorstenSchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2007. Do works councils inhibit investment?Industrial and Labor Relations Review60(2): 187–203.
5.
AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 1997. On the determinants of mandatory works councils in Germany. Industrial Relations36(4): 419–45.
6.
AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2001. Works councils in Germany: Their effects on establishment performance. Oxford Economics Papers53(4): 659–94.
7.
AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2004. The course of research into the economic consequences of German works councils. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(2): 255–81.
8.
AndersonElizabeth. 2017. Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
ArnoldDanielBrändleTobiasGoerkeLaszlo. 2018. Sickness absence and works councils: Evidence from German individual and linked employer-employee data. Industrial Relations57(2): 260–95.
10.
AumayrChristineStavroulaDemetriadesFodenDavidScepanovicsVeraWolf.Felix2011. Employee representation at establishment level in Europe: European Company Survey 2009. Eurofound Report. Dublin, Ireland.
11.
BaumsTheodorFrickBernd. 1998. Codetermination in Germany: The impact of court decisions on the market value of firms. Economic Analysis1(2): 143–62.
12.
BefortStephen. 2004. A new voice for the workplace: A proposal for an American works councils act. Missouri Law Review69(3): 607–52.
13.
BermigAndreasFrickBernd. 2010. Board size, board composition, and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Germany. Working Paper. Accessed at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1623103. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
14.
BéthouxElodieMiasArnaud. 2021. How does state-led decentralization affect workplace employment relations? The French case in a comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(1): 5–21.
15.
BjorheimLars. 1974. The development of industrial democracy in Norway. Conference Paper. International Conference on Manpower Training and Development. Oslo, Norway.
16.
BlandholChristineMogstadMagneNilssonPeterVestadOla. 2020. Do employees benefit from worker representation on corporate boards?NBER Working Paper No. 28269. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
BorusyakKirillJaravelXavierSpiessJann. 2021. Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Working Paper. Accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12419.
18.
BuddJohn W.2004. Employment with a Human Face: Balancing Efficiency, Equity, and Voice. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.
19.
Bundestag. 2001. Begründung zum Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Reform des Betriebsverfassungsgesetzes [Justification for the draft law to reform the Works Constitution Act]. Government Document.
20.
BurdínGabrielDeanAndrés. 2009. New evidence on wages and employment in worker cooperatives compared with capitalist firms. Journal of Comparative Economics37(4): 517–33.
21.
BurdínGabrielDeanAndrés. 2012. Revisiting the objectives of worker-managed firms: An empirical assessment. Economic Systems36(1): 158–71.
22.
CameronColinGelbachJonahMillerDouglas. 2008. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics90(3): 414–27.
23.
CardDavidHeiningJörgKlinePatrick. 2013. Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics128(3): 967–1015.
24.
CarmichaelLorne. 1983. Firm-specific human capital and promotion ladders. Bell Journal of Economics14(1): 251–58.
CompaLance. 2014. An overview of collective bargaining in the United States. In HernándezJuan Gorelli (Ed.), El derecho a la negociación colectiva: Monografías de temas laborales, pp. 91–98. Seville, Spain: Consejo Andaluz de Relaciones Laborales.
27.
ConchonAline. 2011. Board-level employee representation rights in Europe: Facts and trends. European Trade Union Institute Report 121. Brussels: ETUI.
28.
DammannJensEidenmuellerHorst. 2021. Codetermination: A poor fit for U.S. corporations. Columbia Business Law Review2020(3): 870–941.
29.
DillVerenaJirjahnUwe. 2017. Foreign owners and the quality of industrial relations in Germany. Economic and Industrial Democracy38(1): 5–25.
30.
DoellgastVirginiaHoltgreweUrsulaDeeryStephen. 2009. The effects of national institutions and collective bargaining arrangements on job quality in front-line service workplaces. Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(4): 489–509.
FrandsenBrigham. 2021. The surprising impacts of unionization: Evidence from matched employer-employee data. Journal of Labor Economics39(4): 861–94.
33.
FreemanRichard B.LazearEdward P.1995. An economic analysis of works councils. In RogersJoelStreeckWolfgang (Eds.), Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pp. 27–52. NBER Comparative Labor Markets Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L.1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
FregeCarolaGodardJohn. 2014. Varieties of capitalism and job quality: The attainment of civic principles at work in the United States and Germany. American Sociological Review79(5): 942–65.
37.
FriedmanMilton. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September13, section SM, p. 17.
38.
FurubotnEirik. 1988. Codetermination and the modern theory of the firm: A property rights analysis. Journal of Business61(2): 165–81.
39.
GaricanoLuisLelargeClaireVan ReenenJohn. 2016. Firm size distortions and the productivity distribution: Evidence from France. American Economic Review106(11): 3439–79.
40.
GoldMichaelKlugeNorbertConchonAline (Eds.). 2010. “In the Union and on the Board”: Experiences of Board-Level Employee Representatives across Europe. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
41.
GoldMichaelWaddingtonJeremy. 2019. Board-level employee representation in Europe: State of play. European Journal of Industrial Relations25(3): 205–18.
42.
GortonGarySchmidFrank. 2004. Capital, labor, and the firm: A study of German codetermination. Journal of the European Economic Association2(5): 863–905.
43.
GrallaRafaelKraftKornelius. 2018. Separating introduction effects from selectivity effects: The differences in employment patterns of codetermined firms. Labour32(1): 93–111.
44.
GreenwaldDaniel L.LettauMartinLudvigsonSydney C.2018. How the wealth was won: Factor shares as market fundamentals. NBER Working Paper No. 25769. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
45.
GregoricAleksandraRappMarc Steffen. 2019. Board-level employee representation (BLER) and firms’ responses to crisis. Industrial Relations58(3): 376–422.
46.
Gumbrell-McCormickRebeccaHymanRichard. 2013. Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
HammerTove H.CurrallSteven C.SternRobert N.1991. Worker representation on boards of directors: A study of competing roles. Industrial and Labor Relations Review44(4): 661–80.
HansmannHenryKraakmanReinier. 2000. The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal89: 439–68.
50.
HarjuJarkkoJägerSimonSchoeferBenjamin. 2021. Voice at work. NBER Working Paper No. 28522. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
51.
HaydenGrant M.BodieMatthew T.2021. Codetermination in theory and practice. Florida Law Review73(2): 1–42.
52.
HirschBorisMuellerSteffen. 2020. Firm wage premia, industrial relations, and wage sharing in Germany. ILR Review73(5): 1119–46.
53.
HirschBorisSchankThorstenSchnabelClaus. 2009. Works councils and separations: Voice, monopoly, and insurance effects. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4126. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
54.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
HörischFelix. 2012. The macro-economic effect of codetermination on income equality. SSRN Electronic Journal. Accessed at https://10.2139/ssrn.2187264.
57.
JacksonGregory. 2005. Employee representation in the board compared: A fuzzy sets analysis of corporate governance, unionism and political institutions. Industrielle Beziehungen12(3): 1–28.
58.
JägerSimonNoyShakkedSchoeferBenjamin. 2021. Codetermination and power in the workplace. Working Paper. Accessed at http://economics.mit.edu/files/21791.
59.
JägerSimonSchoeferBenjaminHeiningJörg. 2021. Labor in the boardroom. Quarterly Journal of Economics136(2): 669–725.
60.
JensenMichaelMecklingWilliam. 1979. Rights and production functions: An application to labor-managed firms and codetermination. Journal of Business52(4): 469–506.
61.
JirjahnUwe. 2010. Works councils and employment growth in German establishments. Cambridge Journal of Economics34(3): 475–500.
62.
JirjahnUwe. 2017. Works councils and collective bargaining in Germany: A simple theoretical extension to reconcile conflicting empirical findings. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics173(2): 322–46.
63.
JirjahnUweMuellerSteffen. 2014. Non-union worker representation, foreign owners, and the performance of establishments. Economic and Industrial Democracy66(1): 140–63.
64.
JirjahnUweSmithStephen. 2018. Nonunion employee representation: Theory and the German experience with mandated works councils. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics89(1): 201–33.
65.
KeskinenMaija. 2017. Workplace cooperation and firm performance–Evidence from Finland. Master’s Thesis. Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
66.
KimHanMaugErnstSchneiderChristoph. 2019. Labor representation in governance as an insurance mechanism. Review of Finance22(4): 1251–89.
67.
KnudsenHerman. 2006. Workplace representation in Denmark–Structure and role. HIVA-EZA Conference Paper, November 9–10. Research Institute for Work and Society (HIVA)-Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). KU Leuven: Leuven, Belgium.
68.
KochanThomasKimballWilliam. 2019. Unions, worker voice, and management practices: Implications for a high-productivity, high-wage economy. RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences5(5): 88–108.
LazearEdward. 1979. Why is there mandatory retirement?Journal of Political Economy87(6): 1261–84.
71.
LeeDavidMasAlexandre. 2012. Long-run impacts of unions on firms: New evidence from financial markets, 1961–1999. Quarterly Journal of Economics127(1): 333–78.
72.
LevineDavidTysonLaura D’Andrea. 1989. Participation, productivity, and the firm’s environment. In BlinderAlan S. (Ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence, pp. 183–237. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
73.
LevinsonKlas. 2000. Codetermination in Sweden: Myth and reality. Economic and Industrial Democracy21: 457–73.
LinChenSchmidThomasXuanYuhai. 2018. Employee representation and financial leverage. Journal of Financial Economics127(2): 303–24.
76.
LindbeckAssarSnowerDennis. 1989. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Books.
77.
MacLeodW. BentleyNakavacharaVoraprapa. 2007. Can wrongful discharge law enhance employment?Economic Journal117(521): F218–78.
78.
MalcomsonJames. 1983. Trade unions and economic efficiency. Economic Journal93(suppl.): 51–65.
79.
McCraryJustin. 2008. Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 698–714.
80.
McGaugheyEwan. 2016. The codetermination bargains: The history of German corporate and labor law. Columbia Journal of European Law23(1): 1–43.
81.
MuellerSteffen. 2012. Works councils and establishment productivity. ILR Review65(4): 880–98.
82.
MuellerSteffenNeuschaefferGeorg. 2020. Worker participation in decision-making, worker sorting, and firm performance. IWH Discussion Paper No. 11/2020. Halle, Germany: Halle Institute for Economic Research.
83.
MuellerSteffenStegmaierJens. 2017. The dynamic effects of works councils on labour productivity: First evidence from panel data. British Journal of Industrial Relations55(2): 372–95.
84.
Müller-JentschWalther. 1992. Germany: From collective voice to co-management. In RogersJoelStreeckWolfgang (Eds.), Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pp. 53–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
PasterThomas. 2012. Do German employers support board-level codetermination? The paradox of individual support and collective opposition. Socio-Economic Review10(3): 471–95.
86.
PfeiferChristian. 2010. Works councils, union bargaining and quits in German firms. Economic and Industrial Democracy32(2): 243–60.
87.
RedekerNils. Forthcoming. The politics of stashing wealth: The demise of labor power and the global rise of corporate savings. Journal of Politics.
88.
RehderBritta. 2003. Betriebliche Bündnisse für Arbeit in Deutschland: Mitbestimmung und Flächentarif im Wandel [Company alliances for work in Germany: codetermination and area tariffs in transition]. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
89.
RoseCaspar. 2008. The challenges of employee-appointed board members for corporate governance: The Danish evidence. European Business Organization Law Review9(2): 215–35.
90.
SchnabelClaus. 2020. Betriebliche Mitbestimmung in Deutschland: Verbreitung, Auswirkungen und Implikationen [Workplace participation in Germany: Distribution, effects and implications]. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik21(4): 361–78.
91.
SchultenThorsten. 2016. The meaning of extension for the stability of collective bargaining in Europe. ETUI Policy Brief No. 4/2016. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
SilviaStephen J.2013. Holding the Shop Together: German Industrial Relations in the Postwar Era. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.
94.
SilviaStephen J.2018. The United Auto Workers’ attempts to unionize Volkswagen Chattanooga. ILR Review71(3): 600–624.
95.
SilviaStephen J.2020. The UAW attempts to organize Volkswagen Chattanooga: The sequel. Conference Paper, 72nd Annual Meeting of the Labor Employment Research Association.
96.
SippolaMarkku. 2012. Local bargaining and codetermination: Finnish experience in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(1): 53–69.
97.
SmithStephen. 1991. On the economic rationale for codetermination law. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization16(3): 261–81.
98.
StansburyAnnaSummersLawrence H.2020. The declining worker power hypothesis: An explanation for the recent evolution of the American economy. NBER Working Paper No. 27193. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
99.
StettesOliver. 2007. Die Arbeitnehmermitbestimmung im Aufsichtsrat: Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung [Employee participation on the supervisory board: Results of a company survey]. IW-Trends-Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung34(1): 17–30.
100.
StrineLeoJr.2002. The social responsibility of boards of directors and stockholders in charge of control transactions: Is there any “there” there?Southern California Law Review75(5): 1169–88.
101.
StrineLeo E.Jr.KovvaliAneilWilliamsOluwatomi O.2021. Lifting labor’s voice: A principled path toward greater worker voice and power within American corporate governance. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law, No. 2256.
102.
SvejnarJan. 1981. Relative wage effects of unions, dictatorship and codetermination: Econometric evidence from Germany. Review of Economics and Statistics63(2): 188–97.
103.
ThelenKathleen Ann. 1991. Union of Parts: Labor Politics in Postwar Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
104.
UusitaloRoopeVartiainenJuhana. 2009. Finland: Firm factors in wages and wage changes. In LazearEdward P.ShawKathryn L. (Eds.), The Structure of Wages: An International Comparison, pp. 149–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
105.
Van Den BergAnnetteGriftYolandaVan WitteloostuijnArjen. 2000. Collective decision making: Toward a relational perspective. American Behavioral Scientist43(8): 1301–15.
VisserJelle. 2021. OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database: Detailed note on definitions, measurement, and sources. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
