Researchers’ interest in monopsony has increased in recent years. This article reviews the accumulating evidence that employers have considerable monopsony power. It summarizes the application of this idea to explaining the impact of minimum wages and immigration, in anti-trust, and in understanding how to model the determinants of earnings in matched employer–employee data sets and the implications for inequality and the labor share.
AbowdJohn M.KramarzFrancisMargolisDavid N.1999. High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica67(2): 251–333.
3.
AmiorMichaelManning.Alan2020. Monopsony and the wage effects of migration. CEP LSE Discussion Paper. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
AzarJoséHuet-VaughnEmilianoMarinescuIoana ElenaTaskaBlediVon WachterTill. 2019. Minimum wage employment effects and labor market concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 26101. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
AzarJoséMarinescuIoanaSteinbaumMarshall I.2017. Labor market concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 24147. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
AzarJoséMarinescuIoanaSteinbaumMarshall I.2019. Measuring labor market power two ways. AEA Papers and Proceedings109: 317–21.
8.
AzarJoséMarinescuIoanaSteinbaumMarshall I.TaskaBledi. 2018. Concentration in US labor markets: Evidence from online vacancy data. NBER Working Paper No. 24395. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9.
BalasubramanianNatarajanChangJin WooSakakibaraMarikoSivadasanJagadeeshStarr.Evan2019. Locked in? The enforceability of covenants not to compete and the careers of high-tech workers. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-17-09, Ross School of Business Paper No. 1339, and forthcoming at Journal of Human Resources.
10.
BanfiStefanoVillena-RoldánBenjamín. 2019. Do high-wage jobs attract more applicants? Directed search evidence from the online labor market. Journal of Labor Economics37(3): 715–46.
11.
BelmanDaleWolfsonPaul J.2014. What does the minimum wage do? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
12.
BelotMichèleKircherPhilippMullerPaul. 2019. Providing advice to jobseekers at low cost: An experimental study on online advice. Review of Economic Studies86(4): 1411–47.
13.
BenmelechEfraimBergmanNittaiKimHyunseob. 2018. Strong employers and weak employees: How does employer concentration affect wages? NBER Working Paper No. 24307. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
BergerDavidHerkenhoffKyleMongeySimon. 2019. Labor market power. NBER Working Paper No. 25719. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
BoalWilliam M.RansomMichael R.1997. Monopsony in the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature35(1): 86–112.
16.
BorjasGeorge J.2003. The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4): 1335–74.
17.
BosslerMarioGernerHans-Dieter. 2019. Employment effects of the new German minimum wage: Evidence from establishment-level microdata. ILR Review, OnlineFirst, November. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919889635.
18.
BrenčičVera. 2012. Wage posting: Evidence from job ads. Canadian Journal of Economics45(4): 1529–59.
19.
BrenzelHannahGartnerHermannSchnabelClaus. 2014. Wage bargaining or wage posting? Evidence from the employers’ side. Labor Economics29: 41–48.
20.
BronfenbrennerMartin. 1956. Potential monopsony in labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review9(4): 577–88.
21.
BuntingRobert L.1962. Employer Concentration in Local Labor Markets. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
BurdettKennethMortensenDale T.1998. Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. International Economic Review39(2): 257–73.
CaliendoMarcoSchröderCarstenWittbrodtLinda. 2019. The causal effects of the minimum wage introduction in Germany: An overview. German Economic Review20(3): 257–92.
26.
CardDavid E.KruegerAlan B.1995. Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
CardDavidCardosoAnn RuteHeiningJorgKlinePatrick. 2018. Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labor Economics36: S13–S70.
28.
CardDavidCardosoAna RuteKlinePatrick. 2016. Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women. Quarterly Journal of Economics131(2): 633–86.
29.
CardDavidHeiningJorgKlinePatrick. 2013. Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics128(3): 967–1015.
30.
CengizDorukDubeArindrajitLindnerAttilaZippererBen. 2019. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. Quarterly Journal of Economics134(3): 1405–54.
31.
Dal BóErnestoFinanFredericoRossiMartín A.2013. Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Quarterly Journal of Economics128(3): 1169–218.
32.
De LoeckerJanEeckhoutJan. 2017. The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. NBER Working Paper No. 23687. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
DepewBriggsNorlanderPeterSorensenTodd. 2017. Inter-firm mobility and return migration patterns of skilled guest workers. Journal of Population Economics30(2): 681–721.
35.
DepewBriggsSørensenTodd A.2013. The elasticity of labor supply to the firm over the business cycle. Labour Economics24: 196–204.
36.
DeyMatthewHandwerkerElizabeth Weber. 2019. Megafirms and monopsonists: Not the same employers, not the same workers. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
37.
DoranKirkGelberAlexanderIsenAdam. 2014. The effects of high-skilled immigration policy on firms: Evidence from H-1B visa lotteries. NBER Working Paper No. 20668. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
38.
DubeArindrajitGiulianoLauraLeonardJonathan. 2019. Fairness and frictions: The impact of unequal raises on quit behaviour. American Economic Review109(2): 620–63.
39.
DubeArindrajitJacobsJeffNaiduSureshSuriSiddharth. 2020. Monopsony in online labor markets. American Economic Review: Insights2(1): 33–46. doi:10.1257/aeri.20180150.
40.
DubeArindrajitLesterT. WilliamReichMichael. 2016. Minimum wage shocks, employment flows, and labor market frictions. Journal of Labor Economics34(3): 663–704.
41.
DubeArindrajitManningAlanNaiduSuresh. 2020. Monopsony and employer mis-optimization account for round number bunching in the wage distribution, NBER Working Paper No. 24991. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
FalchTorberg. 2010. The elasticity of labor supply at the establishment level. Journal of Labor Economics28(2): 237–66.
44.
GibbonsEricGreenmanAllieNorlanderPeterSorensenTodd. 2019. Monopsony power and guest worker programs. Antitrust Bulletin64(4): 540–65.
45.
HallRobert E.KruegerAlan B.2012. Evidence on the incidence of wage posting, wage bargaining, and on-the-job search. American Economic Journal: Macro4(4): 56–67.
HirschBorisJahnElke. 2015. Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants?ILR Review68(3): 501–28.
48.
HirschBorisJahnElkeManningAlanOberfichtnerMichael. 2019. The urban wage premium in urban labor markets. CEP Discussion Paper. Accessed at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1608.pdf. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
49.
HirschBorisJahnElkeSchnabelClaus. 2017. Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labor markets?ILR Review71(3): 676–704.
50.
HuntJenniferXieBin. 2019. How restricted is the job mobility of temporary work visa holders?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management38(1): 41–64.
JaroschGregorNimczikJan SebastianSorkinIsaac. 2019. Granular search, market structure and wages. NBER Working Paper No. 26239. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
54.
KahnLawrence M.2000. The sports business as a labor market laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives14(3): 75–94.
55.
KarabarbounisLoukasNeimanBrent. 2013. The global decline of the labor share. Quarterly Journal of Economics129(1): 61–103.
56.
KlinePatrickPetkovaNevianaWilliamsHeidiZidarOwen. 2019. Who profits from patents? Rent-sharing at innovative firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics134(3): 1343–1404.
57.
KreinerClaus ThustrupReckDanielSkovPeer Ebbesen. 2019. Do lower minimum wages for young workers raise their employment? Evidence from a Danish discontinuity. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00825.
58.
KruegerAlan B.AshenfelterOrley. 2017. Theory and evidence on employer collusion in the franchise sector. Princeton University Working Paper. Accessed at DataSpace: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014f16c547g.
LamadonThibautMogstadMagneSetzlerBradley. 2019. Imperfect competition, compensating differentials and rent sharing in the US labor market. NBER Working Paper No. 25954. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
ManningAlan. 2003. Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
ManningAlan. 2010. The plant size-place effect: Monopsony and agglomeration. Journal of Economic Geography10(5): 717–44.
64.
ManningAlan. 2011. Imperfect competition in labor markets. In AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4, pp. 976–1041. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
65.
ManningAlanPetrongoloBarbara. 2017. How local are labor markets? Evidence from a spatial job search model. American Economic Review107(10): 2877–907.
66.
MarinescuIoana ElenaHovenkampHerbert J.2019. Anticompetitive mergers in labor markets. Indiana Law Journal94(3), Article 5.
67.
MarinescuIoana ElenaPosnerEric A.2019. Why has antitrust law failed workers?Cornell Law Review, forthcoming.
68.
MarinescuIoana ElenaWolthoffRonald. 2019. Opening the black box of the matching function: The power of words. Journal of Labor Economics38(2): 535–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/705903.
69.
MarxMatt. 2011. The firm strikes back: Non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. American Sociological Review76(5): 695–712.
70.
MolloyRavenSmithChristopher L.TrezziRiccardoWozniakAbigail. 2016. Understanding declining fluidity in the U.S. labor market. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity47(1): 183–259.
71.
NaiduSureshNyarkoYawWangShing-Yi. 2016. Monopsony power in migrant labor markets: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Political Economy124(6): 1735–92.
72.
NaiduSureshPosnerEric A.WeylE. Glen. 2018. Antitrust remedies for labor market power. Harvard Law Review132: 256.
RinzKevin. 2018. Labor market concentration, earnings inequality, and earnings mobility. CARRA Working Papers 2018-10. Washington, DC: Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications, U.S. Census Bureau.
80.
RobinsonJoan. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.
SongJaePriceDavid J.GuvenenFatihBloomNicholasvon WachterTill. 2019. Firming up inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics134(1): 1–50.
83.
StaigerDouglas O.SpetzJoannePhibbsCiaran S.2010. Is there monopsony in the labor market? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Labor Economics28(2): 211–36.
84.
StarrEvan. 2019. Consider this: Training, wages, and the enforceability of covenants not to compete. ILR Review72(4): 783–817.
85.
StarrEvanBalasubramanianNatarajanSakakibaraMariko. 2018. Screening spinouts? How noncompete enforceability affects the creation, growth, and survival of new firms. Management Science64(2): 552–72.
StarrEvanPrescottJ.J.BisharaNorman. 2018. Noncompetes in the U.S. labor force. University of Michigan Law & Economics Research Paper No. 18-013. Accessed at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2625714.
88.
SyversonChad. 2019. Macroeconomics and market power: Facts, potential explanations, and open questions. Journal of Economic Perspectives33(3): 23–43.
