The authors examine the association between unionization and non-standard work in terms of coverage and wages. They use data from the master files of Canada’s Labour Force Survey (LFS) between 1997–98 and 2013–14 to define and measure non-standard work and to provide a continuum of vulnerability across work arrangements. The estimated probability of being employed in some form of non-permanent job increased 2.9 percentage points from 1997 to 2014. During that same period, the estimated probability of being in a non-full-time, non-permanent job—another way of capturing non-standard work—increased 2.5 percentage points. Although estimated union wage premiums declined rather precipitously for all groups, the union wage advantage remained highest among non-standard workers. Further, the authors find the union wage premium is largest for the most vulnerable of non-standard workers. In terms of estimates that look across the earnings distribution, the union wage premium among non-standard workers is larger for workers higher up the earnings profile.
BoothAlison L.FrancesconiMarco. 2003. Union coverage and non-standard work in Britain. Oxford Economic Papers55(3): 383–416.
2.
BrysonAlex. 2007. The effect of trade unions on wages. Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Economique46(2): 33–45.
3.
BüchtemannChristoph F.QuackSigrid. 1990. How precarious is “non-standard” employment? Evidence for West Germany. Cambridge Journal of Economics14(3): 315–29.
4.
BurgessJohnConnellJuliaWintertonJonathan. 2013. Introduction: Vulnerable workers, precarious work and the role of trade unions and HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management24(22): 4083–93.
5.
BusbyColinMuthukumaranRamya. 2016. Precarious positions: Policy options to mitigate risks in non-standard employment. Commentary No. 462. Toronto: CD Howe Institute.
6.
CampolietiMichele. 2018. Matching and inverse propensity weighting estimates of the union wage premium: Evidence from Canada, 1997–2014. Industrial Relations57(1): 101–27.
7.
CardDavidLemieuxThomasRiddellCraig W.2004. Unions and wage inequality. Journal of Labour Research25(4): 519–59.
8.
CranfordCynthiaVoskoLeahZukewichNancy. 2003. Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: A statistical portrait. Just Labour3(Fall): 6–22.
9.
DaleAngelaBamfordClaire. 1988. Temporary workers: Cause for concern or complacency?Work, Employment and Society2(2): 191–209.
10.
DiNardoJohnFortinNicoleLemieux.Thomas1996. Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: A semi-parametric approach. Econometrica64(5): 1001–44.
11.
DorigattiLisa. 2017. Trade unions in segmented labour markets: Evidence from the German metal and chemical sectors. ILR Review70(4): 919–41.
12.
DoucouliagosHristosFreemanRichard B.LarochePatrice. 2017. The Economics of Trade Unions: A Study of a Research Field and Its Findings. London: Routledge.
13.
FelsteadAlanKrahnHarveyPowellMarcus. 1999. Young and old at risk: Comparative trends in “non-standard” patterns of employment in Canada and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Manpower20(5): 277–97.
14.
FirpoSergioFortinNicoleLemieuxThomas. 2007. Unconditional quantile regressions. NBER Technical Working Paper Series, Technical Paper No. 339. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed at http://www.nber.org/papers/t0339 (April5, 2018).
FortinNicoleLemieuxThomasFirpoSergio. 2011. Decomposition methods in economics. In AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A, pp. 1–102. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17.
FoxAlan. 1975. Collective bargaining, Flanders, and the Webbs. British Journal of Industrial Relations13(2): 151–74.
18.
FreemanRichard B.1980. Unionism and the dispersion of wages. Industrial and Labor Relations Review34(1): 3–23.
19.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L.1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
20.
GallagherDaniel G.TanskyJudith W.WetzelKurt W.1997. Peripheral employment contracts: The relationship between part-time employment and union attachment. In SverkeMagnus (Ed.), The Future of Trade Unionism: International Perspectives on Emerging Union Structures, pp. 327–46. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
21.
GomezRafaelGundersonMorley. 2005. Non-standard and vulnerable workers: A case of mistaken identity. Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal12(2): 267–83.
22.
GomezRafaelLambDanielle. 2016. Unions and traditionally disadvantaged workers: Evidence from union wage premiums in Canada, 2000 to 2012. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies5(3): 1–21.
23.
GoslingaSjoerdSverkeMagnus. 2003. Atypical work and trade union membership: Union attitudes and union turnover among traditional vs. atypically employed union members. Economic and Industrial Democracy24(2): 290–312.
24.
GreenFrancisKrahnHarveySungJohnny. 1993. Nonstandard work in Canada and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Manpower14(5): 70–86.
25.
HalvorsenRobertPalmquistRaymond. 1980. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review70(3): 474–75.
26.
HeeryEdmund. 2009. Trade unions and contingent labour: Scale and method. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2(3): 429–42.
27.
———. 2010. Worker representation in a multiform system: A framework for evaluation. Journal of Industrial Relations52(5): 543–59.
28.
HirschBarry T.AddisonJohn T.1986. The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence. London: Allen and Unwin.
29.
HoqueKimKirkpatrickIan. 2003. Non-standard employment in the management and professional workforce: Training, consultation and gender implications. Work, Employment and Society17(4): 667–89.
30.
KallebergArne L.2000. Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology26(1): 341–65.
31.
———. 2009. Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review74(1): 1–22.
32.
KimSeongsuFeldmanDaniel C.2000. Working in retirement: The antecedents of bridge employment and its consequences for quality of life in retirement. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1195–210.
33.
KoevoetsWim. 2007. Union wage premiums in Great Britain: Coverage or membership?Labour Economics14(1): 53–71.
34.
KrahnHarvey. 1995. Non-standard work on the rise. Perspectives on Labour and Income. Statistics Canada Catalogue 75-001E (winter): 35–42.
35.
KretsosLefteris. 2011. Union responses to the rise of precarious youth employment in Greece. Industrial Relations Journal42(5): 453–72.
36.
MetcalfDavidHansenKristineCharlwoodAndy. 2001. Unions and the sword of justice: Unions and pay systems, pay inequality, pay discrimination and low pay. National Institute Economic Review176: 61–75.
37.
MorissetteReneHouFengSchellenbergGrant. 2015. Economic insights: Full-time employment, 1976 to 2014. Cat. No. 11-626-X – No.049. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, Social Analysis and Modeling Division, Minister of Industry.
38.
NoackAndreaVoskoLeah. 2011. Precarious jobs in Ontario: Mapping dimensions of labour market insecurity by workers’ social location and context. Law Commission of Ontario: Vulnerable Workers and Precarious Work, November.
39.
OlsenKaren. 2006. The role of nonstandard workers in client-organizations. Industrial Relations/Relations industrielles61(1): 93–117.
40.
OlsenKarenKallebergArne. 2004. Non-standard work in two different employment regimes: Norway and the United States. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 321–48.
41.
OlsonMancur. 1965. Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
PooleMichael. 1981. Theories of Trade Unionism: A Sociology of Industrial Relations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43.
PulignanoValeriaGervasiLuis OrtizFranceschiFabio de. 2016. Union responses to precarious workers: Italy and Spain compared. European Journal of Industrial Relations22(1): 39–55.
44.
SargeantMalcolmTuckerEric. 2009. Health and safety of vulnerable workers: Case studies from Canada and the UK. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety7(2): 51–73.
45.
Statistics Canada. 2014. Guide to the Labour Force Survey 2014. Cat. No. 71-534-G. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey Program, Labour Statistics Division.
VoskoLeah. 2000. Temporary Work: The General Rise of a Precarious Employment Relationship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
49.
WrightChris. 2013. The response of unions to the rise of precarious work in Britain. Economic and Labour Relations Review24(3): 279–96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
