The authors study the effect of corporate board gender quotas on firm performance in France, Italy, and Spain. The identification strategy exploits the exogenous variation in mandated gender quotas within country and over time and uses a counterfactual methodology. Using firm-level accounting data and a difference-in-difference estimator, the authors find that gender quotas had either a negative or an insignificant effect on firm performance in the countries considered with the exception of Italy, where they find a positive impact on productivity. The authors then focus on Italy. Using a novel data set containing detailed information on board members’ characteristics, they offer possible explanations for the positive effect of gender quotas. The results provide an important contribution to the policy debate about the optimal design of legislation on corporate gender quotas.
AbadieAlbertoDrukkerDavidHerrJane LeberImbensGuido. 2004. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal4(3): 290–311.
2.
AckerbergDaniel A.CavesKevinFrazerGarth. 2015. Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica83(6): 2411–51.
3.
AdamsRenée B.FerreiraDaniel. 2007. A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance62(1): 217–50.
4.
AdamsRenée B.FerreiraDaniel. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics94(2): 291–309.
5.
AdamsRenée B.de HaanJacobTerjesenSirivan EesHans. 2015. Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Editorial. Corporate Governance: An International Review23(2): 77–82.
6.
AhernKenneth R.DittmarAmy K.2012. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics127(1): 137–97.
7.
AndersonRonald C.ReebDavid M.UpadhyayArunZhaoWanli. 2011. The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management40(1): 5–38.
8.
BiancoMagdaCiavarellaAngelaSignorettiRossella. 2015. Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review23(2): 129–44.
9.
BøhrenØyvindStauboSiv. 2016. Mandated gender balance and board independence. European Financial Management22(1): 3–30.
10.
CappellariLorenzoDell’AringaCarloLeonardiMarco. 2012. Temporary employment, job flows and productivity: A tale of two reforms. Economic Journal122(562): F188–F215.
11.
CarterDavid A.D’SouzaFrankSimkinsBetty J.SimpsonW. Gary. 2010. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review18(5): 396–414.
12.
CrosonRachelGneezyUri. 2009. Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature47(2): 448–74.
13.
DemsetzHaroldLehnKenneth. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy93(6): 1155–77.
14.
[EC] European Commission. 2012. Women in economic decision-making in the EU: Progress report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
15.
[EC] European Commission. 2014. Gender balance on corporate boards: Europe is cracking the glass ceiling. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
16.
[ECGS] Expert Corporate Governance Services. 2014. ECGS Survey: Composition and remuneration of boards of directors. Paris. Accessed at http://www.ecgs.net.
17.
ErhardtNiclas L.WerbelJames D.ShraderCharles B.2003. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review11(2): 102–11.
18.
FaccioMaraLangLarry H. P.2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics65(3): 365–95.
19.
FaccioMaraMarchicaMaria-TeresaMuraRoberto. 2016. CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance39: 193–209.
20.
FerreiraDaniel. 2015. Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy?Corporate Governance: An International Review23(2): 108–11.
21.
FrancoeurClaudeLabelleRéalSinclair-DesgagneBernard. 2008. Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics81(1): 83–95.
22.
Gregory-SmithIanMainBrian G. M.O’ReillyCharles A.2014. Appointments, pay and performance in UK boardrooms by gender. Economic Journal124(574): F109–F128.
23.
HillmanAmy J.2015. Board diversity: Beginning to unpeel the onion. Corporate Governance: An International Review23(2): 104–7.
24.
HillmanAmy J.DalzielThomas. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integration agency and resource dependence perspective. Academy of Management Review28(3): 383–96.
25.
HuangJiekunKisgenDarren J.2013. Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives?Journal of Financial Economics108(3): 822–39.
JensenMichael C.1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review76(2): 323–29.
28.
KimDaehyunStarksLaura T.2016. Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills?American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings106(5): 267–71.
29.
LincianoNadiaCiavarellaAngelaSignorettiRossella. 2015. Report on corporate governance of Italian listed companies. CONSOB publication. Rome: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa.
30.
LincianoNadiaCiavarellaAngelaSignorettiRossellaLiberaEugenia Della. 2017. Report on corporate governance of Italian listed companies. CONSOB publication. Rome: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa.
31.
MarinovaJoanaPlantengaJannekeRemeryChantal. 2010. Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. Discussion Paper Series 10-03. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute–Utrecht School of Economics.
32.
MasselotAnnickMaymontAnthony. 2014. Balanced representation between men and women in business law: The French “quota” system to the test of EU legislation. Centre for European Law and Legal Studies (CELLS) Working Papers No 2. Leeds, UK: Centre for European Law and Legal Studies.
33.
MatsaDavid A.MillerAmalia R.2013. A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics5(3): 136–69.
34.
MillikenFrances J.MartinsLuis L.1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Journal21(2): 402–33.
35.
Minguez-VeraAntoniaMartinAdina. 2011. Gender and management on Spanish SMEs: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(4): 2853–73.
36.
MuralidharanKarthikPrakashNishit. 2017. Cycling to school: Increasing secondary school enrollment for girls in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics9(3): 321–50.
37.
NiederleMuriel. 2016. Gender. In KagelJohn H.RothAlvin E. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, 2nd edition, pp. 481–553. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Niessen-RuenziAlexandraRuenziStefan. 2018. Sex matters: Gender bias in the mutual fund industry. Management Science. Published online April30.
39.
[OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2015. OECD Corporate Governance Factbook. Paris: OECD Publication.
40.
PostCorinneByronKris. 2015. Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal58(5): 1546–71.
41.
RoseCaspar. 2007. Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review15(2): 404–13.
42.
RossiFabrizioCebulaRichard J.BarthJames R.2017. Female representation in the boardroom and firm debt: Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Economics and Finance42(2): 315–38.
43.
SmithNina. 2014. Gender quotas on boards of directors. IZA World of Labor7: 1–10.
44.
SmithNinaSmithValdemarVernerMette. 2006. Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management55(7): 569–93.
45.
SraerDavidThesmarDavid. 2007. Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association5(4): 709–51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
