In this article, the author studies the strategic interaction between employee stakeholders, in particular labor unions, and top management, and he evaluates the effect of the two parties’ inherent competitive rent-seeking behavior on CEO pay. Using a panel of firms listed on the S&P/TSX Composite Index, the author shows that CEO compensation withstood the financial crisis (2008–2011) despite lower and even negative corporate performance. Further, highly unionized companies were associated with higher CEO pay in terms of non-equity elements such as salary and pension allocations. The presence of unions had no observed effect in reducing bonuses, stock options, and restricted stock units. These findings have implications for the debate on income inequality and the power of unions to bring about change.
BronarsStephen G.DeereDonald R.1991. The threat of unionization, the use of debt, and the preservation of shareholder wealth. Quarterly Journal of Economics106(1): 231–54.
6.
ChhaochhariaVidhiGrinsteinYaniv. 2009. CEO compensation and board structure. Journal of Finance64(1): 231–61.
7.
CoreJohn E.GuayW.LarckerDavid F.2008. The power of the pen and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics88: 1–25.
8.
CoreJohn E.HolthausenRobert W.LarckerDavid F.1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics51: 371–406.
9.
DasguptaSudiptoSenguptaKunal. 1993. Sunk investment, bargaining and choice of capital structure. International Economic Review34(1): 203–20.
10.
DavisGerald F.2003. American cronyism. Contexts2(3): 34–40.
11.
DiNardoJohnHallockKevin F.PischkeJorn-Steffen. 2000. Unions and the labor market for managers. CEPR Working Paper No. 2418. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
12.
ErtimurYoncaFerriFabrizioMusluVolkan. 2011. Shareholder activism and CEO pay. Review of Financial Studies24: 535–92.
13.
FinkelsteinSydneyHambrickDonald C.Cannella Jr.Albert A.Jr.2009. Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L.1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
15.
GabaixXavierLandierAugustin. 2008. Why has CEO pay increased so much?Quarterly Journal of Economics123(1): 49–100.
16.
GomezRafaelTzioumisKonstantinos. 2006. What do unions do to CEO compensation?CEP Discussion Paper No. 720. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
17.
HallBrian J.MurphyKevin J.2003. The trouble with stock options. Journal of Economic Perspectives17: 49–70.
18.
HankaGordon. 1998. Debt and the terms of employment. Journal of Financial Economics48(3): 245–82.
19.
HermalinBenjamin. 2005. Trend in corporate governance. Journal of Finance60: 2351–84.
20.
HirschBarry T.1991. Union coverage and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics73(1): 69–77.
HubbardRobert Glenn. 2005. Pay without performance: A market equilibrium critique. Journal of Corporation Law30: 717–20.
23.
JensenMichael C.1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance48(3): 831–80.
24.
JensenMichael C.MurphyKevin J.1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy98(2): 225–64.
25.
KatzHarryBattRosemaryKeefeJeffrey. 2003. The revitalization of the CWA: Integrating collective bargaining, political action, and organizing. Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(4): 573–90.
26.
KuhnPeter. 1985. Union productivity effects and economic efficiency. Journal of Labor Research6(3): 229–48.
27.
KuhnPeter. 1988. Unions and the economy: What we know; what we should know. Canadian Journal of Economics31(5): 1033–56.
28.
LeeDavidMasAlexandre. 2012. Long-run impacts of unions on firms: New evidence from financial markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics127(1): 333–78.
29.
MackenzieHugh. 2011. Recession-proof: Canada’s 100 best-paid CEOs. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Growing GAP Project.
30.
MainBrianO’Reilly IIICharles A.IIIWadeJ.1995. The CEO, the Board of Directors, and executive compensation: Economic and psychological perspectives. Industrial and Corporate Change4: 293–332.
31.
MatsaDavid A.2010. Capital structure as a strategic variable: Evidence from collective bargaining. Journal of Finance65(3): 1197–1232.
32.
MurphyKevin J.1999. Executive compensation. In AshenfelterOrley C.CardDavid (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3B, pp. 2486–563. New York: North- Holland/Elsevier.
NewmanHarry A.MozesHaim A.1999. Does the composition of the compensation committee influence CEO compensation practices?Financial Management28(3): 41–53.
35.
PerottiEnricoSpierKathryn E.1993. Capital structure as a bargaining tool: The role of leverage in contract renegotiation. American Economic Review83(5): 1131–41.
36.
RosenSherwin. 1990. Contracts and the market for executives. NBER Working Paper No. 3542. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
RubackRichard S.ZimmermanMartin B.1984. Unionization and profitability: Evidence from the capital market. Journal of Political Economy92(6): 1134–57.
38.
SinghParbudyalAgarwalNaresh C.2002. Union presence and executive compensation: An exploratory study. Journal of Labor Research23(4): 631–46.
39.
UseemMichael. 1984. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
YermackDavid. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics40: 185–211.
41.
ZajacEdward J.WestphalJ. D.1994. The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better?Strategic Management Journal (Winter Special Issue) 15: 121–42.
