Using county-level data, the author evaluates how labor affected the general population's political behavior during the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Voter turnout increased with unionization, but at declining rates with higher levels of unionization. The unionization/voter turnout link was stronger in counties with lower median incomes, higher income inequality, and lower levels of education, suggesting that unions partially closed the political participation gap between low- and high-SES (socioeconomic status) populations. State right-to-work laws, and the absence of collective bargaining rights for public employees, reduced labor's ability to increase voter turnout. The union effect on candidate preference had a positive, curvilinear association with union membership, but this effect was stronger in high-SES regions than in low-SES regions. Overall, these results imply a paradox for organized labor: unions can effectively increase working-class voter turnout, but they have difficulty persuading the working class to vote for pro-labor political candidates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL-CIO. 2005. Winning for Working Families: Recommendations from the Officers of the AFL-CIO for Uniting and Strengthening the Union Movement. April.
AlmondGabriel A.VerbaSidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
4.
AlvarezR. Michael. 1998. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
ARDA. 2007. Religious Congregations and Membership Study 2000 (Counties File). University Park, Pa.: Association for Religious Data Archives. Online at http://www.thearda.com.
6.
AsherHerbert B.HeberligEric S.RipleyRandall B.SnyderKaren. 2001. American Labor Unions in the Electoral Arena. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BennettStephen E.1991. “Left Behind: Exploring Declining Turnout among Noncollege Young Whites.”Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 314–33.
8.
BlaunerRobert. 1964. Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BokDerek C.DunlopJohn T., 1970. Labor and the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
BradyHenry E.SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidney. 1999. “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists.”American Political Science Review, Vol. 93, No. 1 (March), pp. 153–68.
11.
BradyHenry E.VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay Lehman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.”American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 2 (June), pp. 271–94.
12.
ChinoyEli. 1950. “Local Union Leadership.” In GouldnerAlvin W., ed., Studies in Leadership: Leadership and Democratic Action. New York: Harper.
13.
CleggHugh A.1960. A New Approach to Industrial Democracy. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
14.
CommonsJohn R.1919. Industrial Goodwill. New York: McGraw Hill.
15.
CookAlice H.1963. Union Democracy: Practice and Ideal. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
16.
CookStephen L.1978. “AFL-CIO Local Central Body Political Activity: A Case Study.” In RehmusCharles M.McLaughlinDoris B.NesbittFredrick H., eds., Labor and American Politics, pp. 293–307. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
CrottyWilliam. 1991. “Political Participation: Mapping the Terrain.” In CrottyWilliam, ed., Political Participation and American Democracy, pp. 1–22. New York: Greenwood.
18.
DelaneyJohn ThomasMastersMarick F.SchwochauSusan. 1988. “Unionism and Voter Turnout.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 221–36.
19.
DelaneyJohn ThomasMastersMarick F.SchwochauSusan. 1990. “Union Membership Voting for COPE-Endorsed Candidates.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 5 (July), pp. 621–35.
20.
DerberMilton. 1970. The American Idea of Industrial Democracy, 1965–1965. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
21.
EldenJ. Maxwell. 1981. “Political Efficacy at Work: The Connection between More Autonomous Forms of Workplace Organization and More Participatory Politics.”American Political Science Review, Vol. 75, No. 1 (March), pp. 43–58.
22.
FormWilliam. 1995. Segmented Labor, Fractured Politics. New York: Plenum.
23.
FrankThomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Henry Holt.
24.
GoldenClinton S.RuttenbergHarold J., 1942. The Dynamics of Industrial Democracy. New York: Harper.
HeimannEduard. 1937. “Democratic Freedom and the Organization of Labor.” In AscoliMaxLehmannFritz, eds., Political and Economic Democracy. New York: W. W. Norton.
27.
HojnackiMarieBaumLawrence. 1992. “New Style Judicial Campaigns and the Voters: Economic Issues and Unions in Ohio.”Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 921–48.
28.
HoutMichaelManzaJeffBrooksClem. 1999. “Classes, Unions, and the Realignment of US Presidential Voting, 1952–1992.” In EvansGeoffrey, ed., The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
29.
HuckfeldtRobertKohfeldCarol Weitzel. 1989. Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
30.
JuravichTomShergoldPeter. 1988. “The Impact of Unions on the Voting Behavior of Their Members.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 41, No. 3 (April), pp. 374–85.
31.
LaneRobert E.1985. “From Political to Industrial Democracy?”Polity, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Summer), pp. 623–48.
32.
LauckWilliam Jett. 1926. Political and Industrial Democracy, 1776–1926. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
33.
LijphartArend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.”American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No. 1 (March), pp. 1–15.
34.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1954. “The Political Process in Trade Unions: A Theoretical Statement.” In BergerMonroeAbelTheodorePageCharles H., eds., Freedom and Control in Modern Society. Toronto, Ont.: D. Van Nostrand.
35.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1981. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36.
LipsitzLewis. 1964. “Work Life and Political Attitudes.”American Political Science Review, Vol. 58, No. 4 (December), pp. 951–62.
37.
LublinDavidVossD. Stephen. 2001. Federal Elections Project. American University, Washington, D.C., and the University of Kentucky, Lexington.
38.
MasonRonald M.1982. Participatory and Workplace Democracy: A Theoretical Development in Critique of Liberalism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
39.
MichelsRobert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.
40.
MillerWarren E.ShanksJ. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
41.
MillsC. Wright. 1948. The New Men of Power: America's Labor Leaders. New York: Harcourt Brace.
42.
PatemanCarole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RadcliffBenjamin. 2001. “Organized Labor and Electoral Participation in American National Elections.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 405–14.
44.
RadcliffBenjaminDavisPatricia. 2000. “Labor Organization and Electoral Participation in Industrial Democracies.”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 1 (January), pp. 132–41.
45.
RapoportRonald B.StoneWalter J.AbramowitzAlan I., 1991. “Do Endorsements Matter? Group Influence in the 1984 Democratic Caucuses.”American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 1 (March), pp. 193–203.
46.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
47.
ShieldsTodd G.GoidelRobert K., 1997. “Participation Rates, Socioeconomic Class Biases, and Congressional Elections: A Crossvalidation.”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, No. 2 (April), pp. 683–91.
48.
SousaDavid J.1993. “Organized Labor in the Electorate.”Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 4 (December), pp. 741–58.
49.
SouthworthCalebStepan-NorrisJudith. 2003. “The Geography of Class in an Industrial American City: Connections between Workplace and Neighborhood Politics.”Social Problems, Vol. 50, No. 3 (August), pp. 319–47.
50.
TeixeiraRuy A.1987. Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States. New York: Greenwood.
51.
UhlanerCarole J.1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 33, No. 2 (May), pp. 390–422.
52.
VerbaSidneyNieNorman H., 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
53.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E., 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
54.
VoosPaula. 2004. “Democracy and Industrial Relations.” LERA Presidential Address, San Diego, Calif., Jan 3–5, reprinted in the LERA Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting.
WolfeArthur C.1969. “Trends in Labor Union Voting Behavior, 1948–1968.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 1–10.
57.
WolfingerRaymond E.RosenstoneSteven J., 1980. Who Votes?New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
58.
ZulloRoland. 2002. “Revitalizing AFL-CIO Political Outreach: Can a Direct Informational Campaign Do the Trick?”Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. 11, pp. 123–44. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
59.
ZulloRoland. 2003. “Shaping Political Preferences through Workplace Mobilization: Unions and the 2000 Election.”Advances in Labor and Industrial Relations, Vol. 12, pp. 173–96. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
60.
ZulloRoland. 2004. “Labor Council Outreach and Union Member Voter Turnout: A Micro-Analysis from the 2000 Election.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 2 (April), pp. 324–38.
