This paper uses linked data on over 1,500 workplaces and 20,000 individuals from the 1998 British Workplace Employee Relations Survey to analyze the relationship between labor unions and the availability of six employer-provided family-friendly policies. Although unions were negatively associated with the availability of work-at-home arrangements and flexible working hours options, they appear to have increased the availability of three other policies designed to help workers balance the demands of work and family: parental leave, special paid leave, and job-sharing options. They did so both by negotiating for additional benefits (monopoly and collective voice effects) and by providing workers with information about existing policies and assisting them in using those policies (facilitation effects).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BailynLotte. 1993. Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World. New York: Free Press.
2.
BailynLotteDragoRobertKochanThomas. 2001. Integrating Work and Family Life: A Holistic Approach. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Work-Family Policy Network. Retrieved October 4, 2001, from http://lsir.la.psu.edu/workfam/WorkFamily.pdf.
3.
BardoelE. AnneMossSimon A.SmyrniosKosmasTharenouPhyllis. 1999. “Employee Characteristics Associated with the Provision of Work-Family Policies and Programs.”International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 563–76.
4.
BevanS.DenchS.TamkinP.CummingsJ., 1999. “Family-Friendly Employment: The Business Case.” DfEE Research Report No. 136. London: Department for Education and Employment.
5.
BravoEllen. 1995. The Job/Family Challenge: A 9to5 Guide. New York: Wiley.
6.
BuchmuellerThomas C.DiNardoJohnVallettaRobert G., 2002. “Union Effects on Health Insurance Provision and Coverage in the United States.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55, No. 4 (July), pp. 610–27.
7.
BuddJohn W.BreyAngela. 2003. “Unions and Family Leave: Early Experience under the Family and Medical Leave Act.”Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 85–105.
8.
BuddJohn W.McCallBrian P., 1997. “The Effect of Unions on the Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Benefits.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 50, No. 3 (April), pp. 478–92.
9.
Bureau of National Affairs. 1986. Work and Family: A Changing Dynamic. Washington, D.C.
10.
CowellSusan. 1993. “Family Policy: A Union Approach.” In CobbleDorothy Sue, ed., Women and Unions: Forging a Partnership. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, pp. 115–28.
11.
CullyMarkWoodlandStephenO'ReillyAndrewDixGill. 1999. Britain at Work: As Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. London: Routledge.
12.
DeitchCynthia H.HuffmanMatt L., 2001. “Family Responsive Benefits and the Two-Tiered Labor Market.” In HertzRosannaMarshallNancy L., eds., Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 103–30.
13.
Department of Trade and Industry. 1999. Workplace Employee Relations Survey: Cross-Section 1998 (computer file). 4th ed.Colchester: The Data Archive (distributor), December 22. SN: 3955.
14.
DragoRobertCostanzaDavidCaplanRobertBrubakerTanyaCloudDarnellHarrisNaomiKashianRussellRiggsT. Lynn. 2001. “The Willingness-to-Pay for Work/Family Policies: A Study of Teachers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 55, No. 1 (October), pp. 22–41.
15.
ForthJohnKirbySimon. 2000. “Guide to the Analysis of the Workplace Employee Relations Survey, 1998.”London: National Institute for Economic and Social Research. Retrieved October 8, 2001, from http://www.niesr.ac.uk/niesr/wers98/Guide.htm.
16.
ForthJohnLissenburghSteveCallenderClareMillwardNeil. 1997. “Family-Friendly Working Arrangements in Britain, 1996.” DfEE Research Report No. 16. London: Department for Education and Employment.
17.
FreemanRichard B.1981. “The Effect of Unionism on Fringe Benefits.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 34, No. 4 (July), pp. 489–509.
18.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L., 1979. “The Two Faces of Unionism.”The Public Interest, No. 57 (Fall), pp. 69–93.
19.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L., 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
20.
GerstelNaomiClawsonDan. 2001. “Unions' Responses to Family Concerns.”Social Problems, Vol. 48, No. 2 (May), pp. 277–97.
21.
GlassJenniferFujimotoTetsushi. 1995. “Employer Characteristics and the Provision of Family Responsive Policies.”Work and Occupations, Vol. 22, No. 4 (November), pp. 380–411.
22.
GrundyLeaBellLissaFiresteinNetsy. 1999. “Labor's Role in Addressing the Child Care Crisis.”New York: Foundation for Child Development. Retrieved February 21, 2003, from http://www.ffcd.org/pdfs/labor.pdf.
23.
GuthrieDougRothLouise Marie. 1999. “The State, Courts, and Maternity Policies in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional Mechanisms.”American Sociological Review, Vol. 64, No. 1 (February), pp. 41–63.
24.
HaleyHeather-LynPerry-JenkinsMaureenArmeniaAmy. 2001. “Workplace Policies and the Psychological Weil-Being of First-Time Parents.” In HertzRosannaMarshallNancy L., eds., Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 227–50.
25.
HeymannJody. 2000. The Widening Gap: Why America's Working Families Are in Jeopardy and What Can Be Done about It. New York: Basic Books.
26.
HirschBarry T.MacphersonDavid A.DuMondJ. Michael. 1997. “Workers' Compensation Recipiency in Union and Nonunion Workplaces.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 50, No. 2 (January), pp. 213–36.
27.
KellyErinDobbinFrank. 1999. “Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity Leave Policies.”American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2 (September), pp. 455–92.
28.
MillerPaulMulveyCharles. 1992. “Trade Unions, Collective Voice, and Fringe Benefits.”Economic Record, Vol. 68, No. 201 (June), pp. 125–41.
29.
MillwardNeilWoodlandStephenBrysonAlexForthJohnKirbySimon. 2001. “A Bibliography of Research Based on the British Workplace Industrial Relations Survey Series.”London: National Institute for Economic and Social Research. Retrieved October 8, 2001, from http://www.niesr.ac.uk/niesr/wers98/Bib2001.pdf.
30.
OstermanPaul. 1995. “Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4 (December), pp. 681–700.
31.
SchwartzRobert M.1996. The FMLA Handbook: A Practical Guide to the Family and Medical Leave Act for Union Members and Stewards. Boston: Work Rights Press.
32.
ThompsonCynthia A.BeauvaisLaura L.LynessKaren S., 1999. “When Work-Family Benefits Are Not Enough: The Influence of Work-Family Culture on Benefit Utilization, Organizational Attachment, and Work-Family Conflict.”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 54, No. 3 (June), pp. 392–415.
33.
WaldfogelJane. 1998. “The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference?”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 16, No. 3 (July), pp. 505–45.
34.
WeilDavid. 1996. “Regulating the Workplace: The Vexing Problem of Implementation.” In LewinDavidKaufmanBruce E.SockellDonna, eds., Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. 7. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 247–86.
35.
WilliamsJoan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
WoodStephen J.de MenezesLilian M.LasaosaAna. 2003. “Family-Friendly Management in Great Britain: Testing Various Perspectives.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 42, No. 2 (April), pp. 221–50.
