The current study investigates the multidimensional relationship between the Indian food sector and environmental deterioration spanning from 1990 to 2023. By employing a robust econometric framework, the autoregressive distributed lag bounds test, vector error correction model approach and the impulse response analysis, the study uncovers an environmentally sensitive sector in India. The findings reveal an inverted U-shaped curve existing between trade and environment, considering the complex relationship between economic growth and sustainability. Beyond significant statistical analysis, the present study highlights the valuable insights for policymakers that play a crucial role in India’s dynamic landscape, guiding the path of sustainable development. By examining the interrelationships between trade, environment and economic growth, the study offers a substantial tool for sustainable policy formulation in India.
AlnourM., & AliM. (2021). Are renewable energy and globalization vital for environmental sustainability in India? Evidence from VECM and time frequency analyses. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültes iDergisi, (61), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.991060
2.
AnserM. K., KhanM. A., NassaniA. A., AldakhilA. M., Hinh VooX., & ZamanK. (2021). Relationship of environment with technological innovation, carbon pricing, renewable energy, and global food production. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(8), 807–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1787000
3.
Awaworyi ChurchillS., InekweJ., IvanovskiK., & SmythR. (2020). The environmental Kuznets curve across Australian states and territories. Energy Economics, 90, 104869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104869
4.
AydinM., KocP., & SahpazK. I. (2023). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with nanotechnology, renewable energy consumption, economic growth and ecological footprint in G7 countries: panel data analyses with structural breaks. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 18(1), 2163724.
5.
BasT., KaraF., & AlolaA. A. (2021). The environmental aspects of agriculture, merchandize, share, and export value-added calibrations in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(44), 62677–62689.
6.
BernsteinL., & IPCC(Eds.). (2008). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report: a report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC.
7.
BibiF., & JamilM. (2021). Testing Environment Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 13581–13594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11516-2
8.
CopelandB. R., & TaylorM. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 70–71.
9.
DalinC., & Rodríguez-IturbeI. (2016). Environmental impacts of food trade via resource use and greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 11(3), 035012.
10.
DickeyD. A., & FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.
HaldarA., & SethiN. (2022). Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology—Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754
13.
HarrisR., & SollisR. (2003). Applied time series modelling and forecasting. Wiley.
14.
HishanS. S., Sasmoko, KhanA., AhmadJ., HassanZ. B., ZamanK., & QureshiM. I. (2019). Access to clean technologies, energy, finance, and food: Environmental sustainability agenda and its implications on Sub-Saharan African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16503–16518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05056-7
15.
HoveS., & TursoyT. (2019). An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117628.
16.
HumbatovaS. I., & HajiyevN. G.-O. (2020). The relationship between oil prices and real estate loans and mortgage loans in Azerbaijan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 1(1), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10532
17.
INCCA (Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment), Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.iitr.ac.in/wfw/web_ua_water_for_welfare/water/WRDM/MOEF_India_GHG_Emis_2010.pdf
18.
JhaR., & MurthyK. B. (2003). An inverse global environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(2), 352–368.
19.
KangH.-S. (2017). Food security, international agricultural trade, and economic growth in China(SSRN Scholarly Paper 3065194). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3065194
20.
MahajanA., & MajumdarK. (2021a). Environmental policy stringency and comparative advantage of environmental sensitive goods: A study of textile exports in G20 countries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(9), 2924–2951. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2021-0304
21.
MahajanA., & MajumdarK. (2021b). Impact of environmental tax on comparative advantage of food and food products: A study of G20 countries in light of environmentally sensitive goods. The Indian Economic Journal, 69(4), 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662211035273
22.
MahmoodH., & AlkhateebT. T. Y. (2017). Trade and environment nexus in Saudi Arabia: An environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(5), 291–295.
23.
MajeedM. T., & AsgharN. (2021). Trade, energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental quality: An empirical evidence from D-8 and G-7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(43), 61302–61316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15066-z
24.
MughalN., ArifA., JainV., ChupraditS., ShabbirM. S., Ramos-MezaC. S., & ZhanbayevR. (2022). The role of technological innovation in environmental pollution, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from South Asian economies. Energy Strategy Reviews, 39, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100745
25.
NassaniA. A., AbroM. M. Q., BatoolR., ShahS. H. A., HyderS., & ZamanK. (2021). Go-for-green policies: The role of finance and trade for sustainable development. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 1409–1423.
26.
NayagaP., Adusah-PokuF., DramaniJ. B., & TakyiP. O. (2021). The threshold effect of electricity consumption and urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in Ghana. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(3), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2021-0229
27.
PataU. K. (2018). The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy, 160, 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095
28.
PhillipsP. C. B., & HansenB. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with i(1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
29.
PhillipsP. C., & PerronP. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
30.
PooreJ., & NemecekT. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992.
31.
QiangL., JianminH., WenruiW., & XuerongW. (2021). Interpretation of economic growth and water pollution intsity based on EKC model. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 292, p. 03045). EDP Sciences.
32.
RanaR., & SharmaM. (2019). Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2018.1542451
33.
RasliA. Md, QureshiM. I., Isah-ChikajiA., ZamanK., & AhmadM. (2018). New toxics, race to the bottom and revised environmental Kuznets curve: The case of local and global pollutants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 3120–3130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.092
34.
SharmaS., & MajumdarK. (2021). Efficiency of rice production and CO2 emission: A study of selected Asian countries using DDF and SBM-DEA. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(12), 2133–2153, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1859997
35.
SternD. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.
