This article examines the link between development outcomes and both political concentration and religious polarisation, analysing how the state’s decision-making process operates within the framework of fiscal federalism, with a focus on the Indian states. To evaluate the effects of religious diversity, coalition governments and political concentration on human development, composite indices such as the ‘fractionalisation index’ and ‘polarisation index’ have been constructed. A dynamic panel-data model is applied to explore the causal relationship between political concentration and development outcomes. The results demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between religious polarisation, diversity and human development, along with a notable influence of political concentration on human development.
ArellanoM., & BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
4.
ArellanoM., & BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
5.
BesleyT., & BurgessR. (2002). The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1415–1451. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935061
6.
BesleyT., PandeR., RahmanL., & RaoV. (2004). The politics of public good provision: Evidence from Indian local governments. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247604323068104
7.
BesleyT., PerssonT., & SturmD. M. (2010). Political competition, policy and growth: Theory and evidence from the US. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1329–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00606.x
8.
BlanchardO., & ShleiferA. (2000). Federalism with and without centralization: China versus Russia(NBER Working Paper 7616).
9.
BoadwayR. W., & ShahA. (Eds.). (2007). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: Principles and practices. World Bank Publications.
10.
BrzezinskiM. (2013). Income polarization and economic growth. National Bank of Poland Working Paper No. 147; SSRN: Rochester, NY, USA
11.
ChhibberP., & NooruddinI. (2004). Do party systems count? The number of parties and government performance in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), 152–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003260981
12.
DamaniaR., & YalcýnE. (2008). Corruption and political competition (No. 2008–7). Economics Discussion Papers.
13.
DashB. B., & MukherjeeS. (2015). Political competition and human development: Evidence from the Indian states. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.947280
14.
EnyediZ. (2008). The social and attitudinal basis of political parties: Cleavage politics revisited. European Review, 16(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798708000264
15.
EnyediZ. (2016). Populist polarization and party system institutionalization: The role of party politics in de-democratization. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(4), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1113883
16.
EstebanJ., & RayD. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 62(4), 819–851.
17.
EstebanJ., & RayD. (2008). Polarization, fractionalization and conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 45(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307087175
18.
GhoshS. (2010). Does political competition matter for economic performance? Evidence from sub-national data. Political Studies, 58(5), 1030–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00823.x
19.
GiniC. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità. Reprinted in E. Pizetti & A. O. Hirschman (Eds.) (1958), Memorie di metodologica statistica. Strategy of Economic Development Yale University Press.
20.
Hirschman. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade 1980 expanded ed. University of California Press.
21.
JadhavV., & MukherjeeS. (2024). Nexus between political federalism, social diversity and human development in India. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 31(1), 187–200.
22.
Jong-A-PinR. (2009). On the measurement of political instability and its impact on economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.09.010
23.
KeeferP., & KhemaniS. (2005). Democracy, public expenditures, and the poor: Understanding political incentives for providing public services. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lki002
24.
KelkarV. (2019). Towards India’s new fiscal federalism. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17(1), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-019-00159-x
25.
LaaksoM., & TaageperaR. (1979). ‘Effective’ number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407901200101
26.
LeBasA. (2011). From protest to parties: Party-building and democratization in Africa. Oxford University Press.
27.
LeBasA. (2018). Can polarization be positive? Conflict and institutional development in Africa. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218756923
28.
McDoomO. S., & GisselquistR. M. (2016). The measurement of ethnic and religious divisions: Spatial, temporal, and categorical dimensions with evidence from Mindanao, The Philippines. Social Indicators Research, 129(2), 863–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1145-9
29.
MontalvoJ. C., & Reynal-QuerolM. (2003). Religious polarization and economic development. Economics Letters, 80(2), 201–210.
30.
MukherjeeS., & ChakrabortyD. (2011). Is there any interdependence between economic growth and human development? Evidence from Indian states. Indian Journal of Human Development, 5(2), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020110208
31.
PandeR. (2003). Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? Theory and evidence from India. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1132–1151.
32.
PapyrakisE., & MoP. H. (2014). Fractionalization, polarization, and economic growth: Identifying the transmission channels. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 1204–1218.
33.
PoloM. (1998). Electoral competition and political rents [Mimeo]. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.143851
34.
RaoM. G. (2002). Fiscal decentralization in Indian federalism. Managing Fiscal Decentralization, 286.
35.
RaoM. G. (2005). Changing contours in federal fiscal arrangements in India. Readings in Public Finance, 440–441.
36.
RaoM. G. (2017). The effect of intergovernmental transfers on public services in India, 218(Working Paper). National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
37.
Reynal-QuerolM. (2002). Ethnicity, political systems, and civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046001003
38.
SvenssonJ. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357860
