A few centuries before the onset of colonial rule in South India, the focus of historical narratives underwent a gradual shift from the affairs of courts and temples to those of rural communities—migrations, land settlements and the political life of local chiefs. These narratives, referred to as ‘social documents’ in this article, evolved through a range of social institutions and found expression across diverse literary genres. Building on modern historical scholarship on this subject and focusing on the Kongu uplands of South India, this article explores three interrelated processes: socio-economic transformations in a frontier peasant society; shifts in the ‘social framework’ that shaped diverse modes of remembering the past; and the intersecting roles of bards, poets and scribes in recording and transmitting social memory at the local level. The opening sections examine the social function of the past in upland society, focusing on Pulavars as genealogists and custodians of peasant memory, and on the social negotiations that shaped collective and localised pasts. The subsequent sections discuss the processes of transmission and textualisation of social memory.
AssmannJ.‘Communicative and Cultural Memory’, in ErllAstrid and NünningAnsgar, eds, Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, Berlin and New York, 2008, pp. 109–18.
3.
BeckB. E. F.Peasant Society in Kongu, Vancouver, 1972.
4.
BeckB. E. F.Elder Brother’s Story (on Oral Epic of Tamil), Madras, 1992.
5.
BergerS., and NivenB., eds, Writing the History of Memory, London, 2014.
6.
BoerW. den. ‘Greco-Roman Historiography in its Relation to Biblical and Modern Thinking’, History and Theory, Vol. 7, 1968, pp. 60–75.
7.
BurkeP.Varieties of Cultural History, New York, 1997.
ChampakalakshmiR.Trade, Ideology, and Urbanization: South India, 300 BC to AD 1300, New Delhi, 1996.
10.
ChampakalakshmiR.Religion, Tradition, and Ideology, New Delhi, 2011.
11.
ChatterjeeI.‘Genealogy, History and the Law: The Case of the Rajamala’, in ChatterjeePartha and GhoshAnjan, eds, History and the Present, Delhi, 2006, pp. 108–43.
12.
ChatterjeeK.‘The Persianization of Itihasa: Performance Narratives and Mughal Political Culture in Eighteenth Century Bengal’, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 67(2) 2008, pp. 513–43.
13.
ChattopadhyayaB.The Making of Early Medieval India, New Delhi, 1994.
14.
ChettiyarC. M. R.Kongu Dēca Rājākkaḷ, Madras, 1950.
FentressJ., and WickhamC.. Social Memory, Oxford, 1992.
22.
GoffJ. L.History and Memory, New York, 1992.
23.
GuhaS.‘Speaking Historically: The Changing Voices of Historical Narration in Western India, 1400–1900’, American Historical Review, Vol. 1092004, pp. 1084–1103.
24.
GunasekaranS.‘Cattle Raiding and Heroic Tradition: Sedentary Pastoralism in Upland Tamil Nadu (Sixth to Tenth Century CE)’, The Indian Historical Review, Vol. 34(1) 2007.
25.
GunasekaranS.‘Migration and Mobility: The Social Memory of Kongu Vellalar Peasantry of South India’, in RamaswamyVijaya, ed., Migrations in Medieval and Early Colonial India, New York, 2016.
26.
HalbwachsM.On Collective Memory, Chicago, 1992.
27.
HuttonP. H.The Memory Phenomenon in Contemporary Historical Writing, New York, 1993.
28.
KaulS.‘“Seeing” the Past: Text and Question of History in Rajatarangini’, History and Theory, Vol. 532014, pp. 194–211.
PurkayasthaS.‘Restructuring the Past in Early-twentieth-century Assam’, in AquilRaziuddin and ChatterjeePartha, eds, History in the Vernacular, Delhi, 2010, pp. 172–208.
33.
RajanK.‘Recent Advances in Early Historic Archaeology of Tamil Nadu’, in Rajagopal, ed., Kaveri: Studies on Epigraphy, Archaeology, and History, Chennai, 2001, pp. 229–47.
