The Inner Line remains one of the most contentious yet enduring legacies of colonial rule in the erstwhile British India’s northeast frontier. However, there is a major disconnect between the popular conception of the Inner Line as a legal shield protecting ‘vulnerable’ communities, and the scholarly deconstruction of the Inner Line as a colonial instrument designed for the exploitation of resources and the policing of hill communities. This article traces the historical trajectory of the Inner Line in India’s northeast and highlights the significant moments when the Inner Line was subjected to varying interpretations. It argues that the history of the Inner Line was characterised by flexibility and instability not only in its physical manifestation as a geographical marker but more particularly in its perceived intent and purpose. Delineating the shifts in the roles and functions that were ascribed to the Inner Line at different historical junctures, this article attempts to reconcile the varied and even contradictory understandings of the Inner Line that continue to persist in postcolonial Northeast India.
Arunachal Pradesh State Archives, Itanagar. File No. 797/1902, Abolition of the Portion of the Inner Line in the Sibsagar District Which Lies Between the Rivers Dikhu and Doyang, 1902.
2.
Arunachal Pradesh State Archives, Itanagar. File No. 915/1907, Modification of the Inner Line of Sibsagar District, 1907.
3.
Arunachal Pradesh State Archives, Itanagar. File No. 1568/1929, Inner lines of the Sadiya and Lakhimpur Frontier Tracts and Naga Hills Districts, 1929.
4.
BahnDivya. ‘Naga Organisations Miffed Over BJP Leader’s Anti-ILP Petition’, 25June2019. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/jun/25/naga-organisations-miffed-over-bjp-leaders-anti-ilp-petition-1995142.html (accessed on 23January2023).
5.
BarehHamlet. Gazetteer of India: Nagaland, Kohima District, Kohima, 1970.
6.
BarpujariH. K.Problem of the Hill Tribes: Northeast Frontier, 1873–1962; Vol. III, Inner Line to McMahon Line, Guwahati, 1981.
7.
BaruaTaz. ‘Return of the Frontier: Understanding the Demands for Inner Line in Northeast India’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 42(3) 2017, pp. 107–20.
8.
BaruahSanjib. Postfrontier Blues: Towards a New Policy Framework for Northeast India, Washington, 2007.
9.
BaruahSanjib. ‘Territoriality, Indigeneity and Rights in the North-East India’, Economic & Political Weekly (henceforth EPW), Vol. 43 (12/13) 2008, pp. 15–19.
10.
BaruahSanjib. In the Name of the Nation: India and its Northeast, Stanford, 2020.
11.
BaruahSanjib, ed. Beyond Counter-Insurgency: Breaking the Impasse in Northeast India, New Delhi, 2009.
12.
BezbaruahRanju. The Pursuit of Colonial Interest in India’s North East, Guwahati, 2010.
13.
ClarkMary Mead. A Corner in India, Philadelphia, 1907.
14.
Constituent Assembly of India. North East Frontier (Assam) Tribal and Excluded Areas Sub-Committee; Vol. 1 (Report), New Delhi, 1947.
15.
Constituent Assembly of India. North East Frontier (Assam) Tribal and Excluded Areas Sub-Committee; Vol. 2 (Evidence), Part I, Lushai, North-Cachar, Garo, Mikir and Naga Hills, New Delhi, 1947.
16.
DasDebojyoti. ‘Colonial Construction of a Frontier: Debating the Inner line Regulation in Sibsagar-Naga Hills’, EPW, Vol. 53(7) 2018, pp. 52–61.
17.
ElwinVerrier. Nagaland, Shillong, 1962.
18.
GualnamAndrew Kap Lian and BabuChalluri. ‘Revisiting the Inner Line Permit: With Reference to Contemporary Issues in Manipur’, Indian Journal of Dalit and Tribal Studies and Action, Vol. 3(3) 2018, pp. 42–53; http://www.ticijournals.org/revisiting-the-inner-line-permit-system-with-reference-to-contemporary-issues-in-manipur/ (accessed on 27Jan2023).
19.
HaimendorfChristoph von Fürer. The Naked Nagas, London, 1939.
20.
HussainImdad. ‘Inner Line’, in WoutersJelle J. P. and SubbaTanka B, eds, The Routledge Companion to Northeast India, New Delhi, 2023, pp. 268–72.
21.
HuttonJ. H.‘Anthropology and Administration’, in ChatterjeeRamananda, ed, The Modern Review: A Monthly Review and Miscellany, Vol. 41 (1–3), Calcutta, 1927, pp. 221–30.
22.
Indian Statutory Commission. Report of the Indian Statutory Commission, Vol. 14, Memorandum Submitted by the Government of Assam to the Indian Statutory Commission, London, 1930.
23.
Joint Committee on Indian Constitutional Reform. Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Sub-Committee D of the Joint Committee on Indian Constitutional Reform, London, 1933.
24.
KarBodhisattva. ‘When was the Postcolonial? A History of Policing Impossible Lines’, in ‘Historia Elastica: A Note on the Rubber Hunt on the North-Eastern Frontier of British India’, Indian Historical Review, Vol. 36(1) 2009, pp. 139–50.
25.
KarBodhisattva. ‘Nomadic capital and Speculative Tribes: A Culture of Contracts in the Northeastern Frontier of British India’, The Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 53(1) 2016, pp. 41–67.
26.
Kuosevo Casavi Private Collection, Mezoma Village, Kohima, Nagaland, Files on Naga Students’ Federation.
27.
MackenzieAlexander. History of the Relations of the Government with the Hill Tribes on the Northeast Frontier of Bengal, Calcutta, 1884.
28.
MichellJohn F.Report (Topographical, Political, and Military) on the Northeast Frontier of India, Calcutta, 1883.
29.
MyrbohBatskhem. ‘Is Inner Line Permit Needed in the Era of Globalisation? Capturing Current Politico-Historical Contestations in Meghalaya’, The Journal of Tribal Intellectual Collective India, Vol. 2(2) 2014, pp. 30–47.
30.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-53, Assam Cachar Boundary Application of Act XXXIII to the Whole of that Part of the Country, 1871.
31.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-39, Application of Act XXXIII, 1872.
32.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-115, Correspondence Regarding Issue of Inner line Regulation between Southern District of Sibsagar and Naga Territory, 1874.
33.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-205, Inner Line Between the Doyang and the Dikhu, 1902.
34.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-208, Proposal to Abolish the Inner Line Between the Mokokchung Sub-Division of this District and Sibsagar, 1902–2003.
35.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-1227, Abolition of the Cachar Inner Line and Prescription of an Inner Line for the Lushai Hill District, 1930.
36.
Nagaland State Archives. Index No. PR-843, Lungshim Shaiza Expulsion from Naga Hills Under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation 1873, 1954.
37.
NaoremDeepak. ‘A Contested Line: Inner Line in Manipur’, Raiot, 29September2015, https://raiot.in/a-contested-line-inner-line-permit-in-manipur (accessed on 23January2023).
38.
National Archives of India. Foreign, Political-A, October, File Nos. 205–211, Dispute Between Mr Minto and Chief of Namsang Nagas, 1873.
39.
National Archives of India. Foreign, Revenue-A, September, File Nos. 14–21, Survey Work in Assam, 1874.
40.
National Archives of India. Foreign, External-A, October, File Nos. 389–394, Relations of the British Government with the Naga Tribes Adjacent to the Boundary of the Lakhimpur, Sibsagar, and Naga Hills Districts, 1884.
41.
National Archives of India. Foreign & Political, External, File No. 63-2/X, Regulation 1925: Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation (Amendment), 1923.
42.
NgaihteThangkhanlal. ‘The Inner Line Permit System will cause more trouble in Manipur, not less’, Scroll.in, 1September2015, https://scroll.in/article/752485/the-inner-line-permit-system-will-cause-more-trouble-in-manipur-not-less (accessed on 27January2023).
43.
PhanjoubamPradip. The Northeast Question: Conflicts and Frontiers, New Delhi, 2016.
44.
ReidRobert. History of the Frontier Areas Bordering on Assam from 1883–1941, Delhi, 1983.
45.
Report on the Administration of the Province of Assam for the Year 1901–1902, Shillong, 1903.
46.
SimpsonThomas. The Frontier in British India: Space, Science, and Power in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, 2022.
47.
Thejalhoukho. ‘The Sikkim-Tibet Convention of 1890 and the Younghusband Mission of 1904’, China Report, Vol. 57(4) 2021, pp. 451–65.
48.
ThoudamNatasa. ‘Divisive Politics of the Inner Line Permit in Three Stories from Manipur in India’s Northeast India’, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 44(4) 2021, pp 790–806.
49.
TunyiZhoto and WoutersJelle J. P.. ‘India’s Northeast as an Internal Borderland: Domestic Borders, Regimes of Taxation, and Legal Landscapes’, The NEHU Journal, Vol. 14(1) 2016, pp. 1–17.
50.
YonuoAsoso. The Rising Nagas: A Historical and Political Study, Delhi, 1974.
51.
ZahlunaJ.‘Inner line Regulation and Mizoram’, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 72(1) 2011, pp. 221–25.
52.
Zapuvisie Lhousa Private Collection, Mezoma village, ‘Government of Nagaland, Home Department, Notification No. con.94/66, 30 September 1966’.
53.
ZouDavidandM.KumarSatish. ‘Mapping a Colonial Borderland: Objectifying the Geo-Body of India’s Northeast’, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 70(1) 2011, pp. 141–70.
