This article examines the colonial representation of Kuki raids in nineteenth century Northeastern India as, at best, ‘lawlessness’ and, at worst, ‘predatory habits of the savage hill tribes’ whose ‘natural love of plunder’ took of it as an ‘amusement’ for procuring human heads or captives for sacrificial purposes. From the hill perspective, it argues that raiding was mainly made to procure human labour forces, and was an expression of hill politics. Essentially, it was a function of newly emerging notions of kingship and authority. Since the early nineteenth century Kuki country witnessed the emergence of some powerful rajahs. The ensuing warfare, death, subjugation and displacement changed the political and demographic landscape of the hills. The new regimes depended mostly on coerced labour power, which now transformed into wealth, not only to construct, enforce and sustain its authority but also to overcome the constraints generated by the non-state practices. The scarcity of labour power in the hills induced them to acquire it from the plains or other hostile tribes through the in-strument of raid.
Blum, S.D.Portraits of ‘Primitives’: Ordering Human Kinds in the Chinese Nation. Oxford, 2001.
2.
Brown, R.Statistical Account of the Native State of Manipur, Delhi, [1873] 2001.
3.
Carey, B.S. and H.N. Tuck. The Chin Hills: A History of the people, British dealings with them, their Customs and Manners, and a Gazetteer of their Country, Delhi, [1895] 1987.
4.
Chatterjee, Indrani. ‘Slavery, Semantics, and the Sound of Silence’, in Indrani Chatterjee and R.M. Eaton, eds, Slavery and South Asian History, Bloomington, 2006, pp. 287–315.
5.
Chatterjee, S. Mizoram under the British Rule. Delhi, 1985.
6.
Dalton, E.T.Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal, Calcutta, [1872] 1960.
7.
Diamond, N. ‘Defining the Miao: Ming, Qing, and Contemporary Views’, in S. Harrell, ed., Cultural Encounters on China’s Ethnic Frontiers, Seattle, 1995, pp. 92–119.
8.
Dun, E.W.Gazetteer of Manipur, Delhi, [1886] 1992.
9.
Faure, David. ‘The Yao Wars in the Mid-Ming and Their Impact on Yao Ethnicity’, in P.K. Crossley, Helen F. Siu and Donal S. Sutton, eds, Empire at the Margins: Culture and Frontier in Early Modern China, Charlottesville, 2006, pp. 171–89.
10.
Fiskesjo, M. ‘On the “Raw” and the “Cooked” Barbarians in Imperial China’, Inner Asia, Vol. I (2), 1999, pp. 139–68.
11.
Fryer, G.E. ‘On the Khyeng People of the Sandoway District, Arakan,’ Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1875 (1), pp. 39–82.
12.
Gordon, S. Marathas, Marauders and State Formation in Eighteenth Century. Delhi, 1994.
13.
Grierson, G.A.Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. iii, Part iii, Delhi, [1904] 1994.
14.
Johnstone, J.Manipur and the Naga Hills, Delhi, [1896] 1987.
15.
Kuper, A.The Reinvention of Primitive Society: Transformation of a Myth. London, 2005.
16.
Lalthangliana, B.History of Mizo in Burma. Aizawl, 1977.
17.
Lehman, F.K.The Structure of Chin Society. Urbana, 1963.
18.
Lewin, T.H.Wild Races of South-Eastern India, Aizawl, [1870] 1978.
19.
Mackenzie, A.The North-East Frontier of India, New Delhi, (1884) 2007.
20.
Macrae, J. ‘Account of the Kookies or Lunctas’, Asiatick Researches, Vol. vii, 1801, New Delhi, 1919, reprint.
21.
McCulloch, W.An Account of the Valley of Manipore and of the Hill Tribes, Delhi, [1859] 1980.
22.
Mills, A.J.M.Report on Assam, Guwahati, [1853] 1984.
23.
Parry, N.E.The Lakhers, Delhi, [1931] 1988.
24.
Pemberton, R.B.The Eastern Frontier of India, Delhi, [1835] 2000.
25.
Pudaite, R.The Education of the Hmar People: With Historical Sketch of the People. Sielmat, 1963.
26.
Reid, A.S.Chin-Lushai Land, including a Description of the Various Expeditions into the Chin-Lushai Hills and the Final Annexation of the Country, Aizawl, [1893] 1976.
27.
Rennel, J. ‘On the Manners, Religion, and Laws of the Cucis, or Mountaineers of Tipra’, Asiatick Researches, Vol. 2, 1790, Routledge, 2000, reprint, pp. 187–93.
28.
Roychowdhury, N.R. ‘Kuki Disturbances in Tripura, 1860–61’, Social Scientist, Vol. 4(9), 1976, pp. 60–65.
29.
Scott, James C.The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, 2009.
Shakespear, L.W.History of the Assam Rifles, Aizawl, [1929] 1977.
32.
Sharma, M.History and History Writing in Northeast India. New Delhi, 1998.
33.
Shaw, W.Notes on the Thadou Kukis. Government of Assam, 1929.
34.
Shulman, D. ‘On South Indian Bandits and Kings’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 17(3), 1980, pp. 283–306.
35.
Skaria, A.Hybrid Histories: Forests, Frontiers and Wildness in Western India. Delhi, 1999.
36.
Skaria, A. ‘Being Jangli: The Politics of Wildness’, Studies in History, Vol. 14 (2), 1998, pp. 193–215.
37.
Soppit, C.A.A Short Account of the Kuki’Lushai Tribes of the North’East Frontier, Aizawl, [1887] 1976.
38.
Stewart, R. ‘Notes on Northern Cachar’, Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal, Vol. xxiv (3), 1855, pp. 582–701.
39.
van Schendel, W. (ed.). Francis Buchanan in Southeast Bengal (1780): His journey to Chittagong, the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Noakhali and Comilla. Dhaka, 1992.
40.
Vumson, Zo History. Aizawl, 1986.
41.
Waddel, L.A.The Tribes of the Brahmaputra Valley, Delhi, [1901] 2000.
42.
Watt, G. ‘The Aboriginal Tribes of Manipur’, The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 16, 1887, pp. 346–70. (www.jstor.com, accessed 31 January 2007).
43.
Wiens, Herold J.China’s March toward the Tropics: A Discussion of the Southward Penetration of China’s Culture, Peoples, and Political Control in relation to the Non’Han’Chinese Peoples of South China in the Perspective of Historical and Cultural Geography. Hamden, 1954.
44.
Zou, David V. ‘Raiding the Dreaded Past: Representations of Headhunting and Human Sacrifice in Northeast India’, Contributions to Indian sociology, (n.s.), Vol. 39 (1), 2005, pp. 75–105.
