The Lie of Power: Empowerment as Impotence

Abstract

The arguments in this paper are based upon an ethnographic description of the circumstances surrounding the investigation of a complaint against the Governors of a small rural Primary School. This is an empirical study of a local struggle in which the role of the researcher as a prisoner in a web of power is highlighted. The case is first analyzed using structural and functional understandings of power as described by Hardy and Clegg. However, the voluntary nature of the individual engagement of the actors in the case highlights the role of the individual's interpretative frameworks-both in operation and as explanatory mechanisms. Structural and functional analyses of power do not appear to fully account for aspects of this situation, and therefore Hopfl's distinction between the poetic and the rhetoric is considered as part of the explanatory mechanism. This paper suggests that "power" can be seen as an individually interpreted quality, and that feelings of "empowerment" are evoked by consonance between the poetic and the rhetoric, but that such consonance also signals impotence.

Keywords

power school governance participant research ethnomethodology voluntary workers trade unions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BANKS, I. M. The use of weapons. London: Orbit , 1990.

BASS, B. M. Still's handbook of leadership (rev. ed). New York: Free Press , 1981.

BRADY, l. (Ed). Anthropological poetics. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield , 1991.

CALDER, B. J. An attributional theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw and G. R. Salanick (Eds.), New directions in organisational behaviour. Chicago: St. Clair Press , 1977.

CLEGG, S. Organisation and control . Administrative Science Quarterly 1981, 26, 545-562 .

COBB, A. T. An episodic model of power. Toward an interpretation of theory and research . Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(3), 482-493 .

EVERED, R. , & LOUIS, M. R. Alternative perspectives in the organisational sciences: 'Inquiry from the inside" and 'inquiry from the outside ." Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6, 385-395 .

FOGEL, A. Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self and culture. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf , 1993.

FORESTER, J. Planning in the face of power. Berkely, CA: University of California Press , 1989.

10.

FOUCAULTT. M. Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon , 1980.

11.

FOUCAULT. M. The history of sexuality. Volume 1: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin , 1981.

12.

FRENCH, J. R. P. , & RAVEN, B. The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper and Row , 1959.

13.

FROST D. E. , FIEDLER, F. E. , & ANDERSON, J. W. The role of personal risk-taking in effective leadership . Human Relations, 1983, 36(2), 185-202 .

14.

GRAMSKI, A. Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart , 1971.

15.

HARDY, C. , & CLEG G, S. R. Some dare call it power. In S. R. Clegg , C. Hardy , and W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies. London: Sage , 1996, pp. 622-641.

16.

HATCH, M. J. The role of the researcher: An analysis of narrative position in organisation theory . Journal of Management Inquiry. 1996, 5(4), 359-374 .

17.

HEARN, J. , SHEPPARD, D. L. , TANCRED-SHERIFF, P. , & BURRELL, G. (Eds.). The sexual of organizations. London: Sage , 1989.

18.

HINKIN, T. R. , & SCHRIESHEIM, C. A. Relationships between subordinate perceptions of supervisor influence tactics and attributed bases of supervisory power . Human Relations. 1990, 43(3), 221-238 .

19.

HOPFL, H. Organisational rhetoric and the threat of ambivalence . Studies in Cultures, Organisations and Societies, 1995, 1(2), 175-188 .

20.

JANIS, I. L. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin , 1972.

21.

KNIGHTS, D. , & MORGAN, G. Strategic discourse and subjectivity: Towards a critical analysis of corporate strategy in organisations . Organisation Studies, 1991, 12(3), 251-273 .

22.

KNIGHTS, D. , & WILLMOTT. H. Power and Identity in theory and practice . Sociological Review, 1985, 33, 22-46 .

23.

KOLARSKA, L. , & ALDRICH, H. Exit voice and silence: Consumers' and managers' responses to organisational decline . Organisation Studies, 1980, 1(1), 41-58 .

24.

KRISTEVA, J. Revolution in poetic language. New York: Columbia University Press , 1984.

25.

KUMAR, P. , & GHADIALLY, R. Organisational politics and its effect upon members of organizations . Human Relations, 1989, 42(4), 305-314 .

26.

LEE, M. M. Spirituality in organisations: Empowerment and purpose . Management Education and Development 1991, 22(3), 221-226 .

27.

LEE, M. M. , LETICHE, H. , CRAWSHAW, R. , & THOMAS, M. (Eds.) Management education in the New Europe. London: International Thompson Publishing , 1996.

28.

LOUIS, M. R. , & SUTTON, R. I. Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking . Human Relations, 1991, 44(1), 55-76 .

29.

MACHIAVELLI, N. The prince. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1961.

30.

McCLELLAND, D. C. Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington , 1975.

31.

MILLER, L. E. , POWELL, G. N. , & SELTZER, J. Determinants of turnover among volunteers . Human Relations, 1990, 43(9), 901-917 .

32.

MOORHEAD, G. , & MONTANARI, J. R. An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon . Human Relations. 1986, 39(5), 399-410 .

33.

MORGAN, G. Images of organisation. London: Sage , 1986.

34.

PFEFFER, J. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing , 1981.

35.

RAVEN, J. Toward measures of high-level competencies: A re-examination of McClelland's distinction between needs and values . Human Relations, 1988, 41(4), 281-294 .

36.

ROSE, N. Governing the soul The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge , 1990.

37.

RUS, V. Positive and negative power.Thoughts on the dialectics of power . Organisation Studies, 1980, 1(1), 3-20 .

38.

SCHON, D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books , 1983.

39.

SHAMIR, B. Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation . Human Relations, 1990, 43(4), 313-332 .

40.

TOWNLEY. B. Reframing human resource management: Power; ethics and the subject at work. London: Sage , 1994.

41.

TURNER, J. C. Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press , 1991.

42.

VIDICH, A. J. , & LYMAN, S. M. Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In N. K. Denzin , and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1994, pp. 23-59.

43.

WILSON, D. C. , BUTLER, R. J. , CRAY, D. , HICKSON, D. J. , & MALLORY, G. R. Breaking the bounds of organisation in strategic decision making , Human Relations, 1986,39(4), 309-332 .

44.

WEBER, M. The theory of social and economic organisation. New York: Free Press , 1947.