Occupational communities represent bounded cultures populated by people with similar work identities that transcend organizational settings. In this paper, I examine the relationship between an occupational community's culture and its ability to control strategic resources that advantage its members. Drawing on an empirical examination of the Canadian forensic accounting, I argue that reputation acts as a strategic resource, not only for individual members, but for the community as a whole. The community's practice standards and membership rules work to heighten the importance of individual practitioners' reputations, which in turn benefits client communities by conferring legitimacy on their claims, and restricts entry into forensic accounting. The role of reputation in Canadian forensic accounting serves to illuminate the importance of resources that, rather than being held in some proprietary fashion, are shared among actors who are, ostensibly, in competition with one another.
ABBOTT, A.The order of professionalization: An empirical analysis. Work and occupations, 1991, 18(4), 355-384.
2.
ANLEU, S. L. R.The professionalisation of social work? A case study of three organizational settings. Sociology, 1992, 26(1), 23-43.
3.
BARBER, B.Some problems in the sociology of professions. In K. S. Lynn (Ed.), The professions in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965.
4.
BARLEY, S. R.Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(3), 404-441.
5.
BEAVER, W. H.Financial reporting. In G. E. Germane (Ed.), The executive course. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1986, pp. 123-148.
6.
BENSON, J. K.The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 201975, 229-249.
7.
CALLON, M., & LATOUR, B.Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975, pp. 277-303.
8.
DiMAGGIO, P. J.Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920-1940. In W. W. Powell and P J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 267-292.
9.
ELLISON, G., & FUDENBERG, D.Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(1), 93-125.
10.
FALCONBRIDGE, C. J.Rice v. Sockett. O.L.R., 1912, 27, 410-410.
11.
FRENZEN, J., & NAKAMOTO, K.Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 1993, 20(3), 360-375.
12.
GAETZ, S.Planning community-based youth services in Cork, Ireland: The relevance of the concepts 'youth' and 'community."'Urban Anthropology, 1992, 21(1), 91-113.
13.
GALASKIEWICZ, J., & MARSDEN, P.Interorganizational resource networks: Formal patterns of overlap. Social Science Research, 1978, 7, 89-107.
14.
GASTON, S. J., CALLAGHAN, C., & SOUTH, S.Matters of interest. CA Magazine, 1992, 125(5), 19-31.
15.
GEPHART, R. P.The textual approach: risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(6), 1465-1514.
16.
GLASER, B. G., & STRAUSS, A. L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine, 1967.
17.
GRANOVETTER, M. S.The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6), 1360-1380.
18.
GREENWOOD, R., COOPER, D. J., HININGS, C. R., & BROWN, J. L.Biggest is best? Strategic assumptions and actions in the Canadian audit industry. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 1993, 10(4), 308-321.
19.
GREENWOOD, R., ROSE, T., COOPER, D., HININGS, C. R., & BROWN, J.The global management of professional services: The example of accounting. In S. Clegg, E. Ibarra, and L. Bueno (Eds.), Theories of management process: Making sense through difference. London: Sage Publications. Forthcoming.
20.
HALL, R.A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14607-618.
21.
KARP, D., STONE, G., & YOELS, W.Being Urban: A social psychological view of city life. Lexington: Heath and Company, 1977.
22.
KILDUFF, M., & KRACKHARDT, D.Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37(1), 87-108.
23.
LANG, G. E., & LANG, K.Recognition and renown: The survival of artistic reputation. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(1), 79-109.
LINCOLN, Y. S., & GUBA, E. G.Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.
27.
MacDONALD, K. M.The Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage, 1995.
28.
MARX, K.Capital: A critique of political economy. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1976.
29.
MIES, M., & SHIVA, V.Ecofeminism. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood, 1993.
30.
O'CARROLL, J. P.Community programmes and the traditional view of community. Social Studies, 1984, 8(3), 137-149.
31.
PETERAF, M. A.The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14179-191.
32.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G.The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
33.
PLANT, S.The most radical gesture: The situationist international in a postmodern age. New York: Routledge, 1992.
34.
POWELL, W. W.Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell and P J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1991.
35.
POWELL, W. W., KOPUT W. W., & SMITH-DOERR, L.Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1), 116-145.
36.
RAUB, W., & WEESIE, J.Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 1990, 96(3), 626-654.
37.
REDDING, S. G.The spirit of chinese capitalism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.
38.
SHRUM, W., & WUTHNOW, R.Reputational status of organizations in technical systems. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 93(4), 882-912.
39.
SI Gnpost. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. 1, 1992.
40.
SOPINKA, J., LEDERMAN, S. N., & BRYANT, A. W.The law of evidence in Canada. Toronto, Canada: Butterworths, 1992.
41.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. Measuring the grapevine: Consumer response and word-of-mouth. Atlanta, GA: The Coca-Cola Co., 1981.
42.
VAN MAANEN, J., & BARLEY, S. R.Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press), 1984, 6, 287-365.
43.
WARING, M.If women counted: A new feminist economics. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1988.
44.
WOOTTON, C. W., TONGE, S. D., & WOLK, C. M.From the big eight to the big six accounting firms. Ohio CPA JournalSpring 1990, 19-23.
