This paper advances a social ecological perspective on the resources necessary to support workplace diversity. It is based on observations from an ongoing organizational case study which used a collaborative inquiry process. We worked with insiders to establish a project steering team, conducted 36 confidential interviews, and met with work units to assess diversity-related concerns. The complex case portrait that emerged illuminates four lessons about the ecology of workplace diversity: (1) the influential role of organizational history and tradition in shaping current diversity dynamics, (2) the importance of understanding how participants' experiences of events may differ, (3) the power of informal organizational processes, and (4) the connections between individual, organizational, and broader cultural values. We discuss these lessons in the context of a three-part definition of support for effective diversity which includes representational, interactional, and cultural components. The goal is to further our understanding of the factors that support or hinder workforce diversity so we may more effectively create settings that are supportive of diversity.
BARKER, R. G.Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behaviorStanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968.
2.
BARTUNEK, J., FOSTER-FISHMAN, P., & KEYS, C.Using Collaborative Advocacy to Foster Intergroup Cooperation: A Joint Insider-Outsider Investigation. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Los Angeles, CA, August 1994.
BOND, M. A.Prevention and the ecology of sexual harassment: Creating empowering climates. In C. Swift (Ed.), Prevention in Human Services, 1995, 12(2), 147-173.
5.
BOND, M. A., & KEYS, C.Empowerment, diversity and collaboration: Promoting synergy on community boards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1993, 21(1), 37-58.
6.
BOND, M. A., & PYLE, J. L.Workplace Diversity: Status, Controversies and an Interdisciplinary Approach. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meetings, Los Angeles California, 1994.
7.
BRONFENBRENNER, U.The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
8.
CHEMERS, M., OSKAMP, S., & CONSTANZO, M.Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for changing workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.
9.
CLAYTON, S., & CROSBY, E.Justice, gender and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.
10.
COX, T.Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, 1993.
11.
EASTLAND, TEnding affirmative action: The case for color blind justice. New York: Basic Books, 1996.
12.
EBERHARDT J., & FISKE, S.Affirmative action in theory and practice: Issues of power, ambiguity, and gender versus race. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1994, 15(1&2), 201-220.
13.
EISENHARDT, K.Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4), 532-550.
14.
FALUDI, S.Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.1991.
15.
FAMILIES AND WORK INSTITUTE. The national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute, 1993.
16.
FINE, M.Individual and Social Resilience in the Face of Discrimination. Presentation at the American Psychological Association National Convention, New York, New York, 1995.
17.
FINE, M. G., JOHNSON, E. L., & RYAN, M. S.Cultural diversity in the workplace. Public Personnel Management, 1990, 19(3), 305-319.
18.
FISKE, S., & NEUBERG, S.A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1990, pp. 1-74.
19.
FISKE, S.Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 1993, 48, 621-628.
20.
FITZGERALD, L. E., SWAN, S., & FISCHER, K.Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 1995, 51(1), 117-138.
21.
FUEHRER, A., & SCHILLING, K.Sexual harassment of graduate students: The impact of institutional factors. The Community Psychologist, 1988, 21(2), 12-13.
22.
FULLERTON, H. N.Labor force projections: The baby boom moves on. Monthly Labor Review, 1991, 114(11), 31-44.
23.
GILLIGAN, C.In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
HARDING, S.Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
26.
HOLAHAN, C. J., & SPEARLY, J. L.Coping and ecology: An integrative model for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1980, 8, 671-685.
27.
JACKSON, S. E.Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In S. Worchel, W Wood, and J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1991, pp. 138-173.
28.
JACKSON, S. E. (Ed.). Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives. New York: The Guilford Press, 1992.
29.
JACKSON, S. E., & ALVAREZ, E. B.Working through diversity as a strategic imperative. In S. E. Jackson (Ed.), Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives. New York: The Guilford Press, 1992, pp. 13-35.
30.
JACKSON, S., & RUDERMAN, M. (Eds.). Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1996.
31.
JOHNSON, W. B., & PACKARD, A. H.Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute, 1987.
32.
KATZ, D., & KAHN, R.The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
33.
KELLY, J. G.Ecological constraints on mental health services. American Psychologist, 1966, 21, 535-539.
34.
KELLY, J. G.Toward an ecological conception of preventive interventions. In J.W Carter (Ed.), Research contributions from psychology to community mental health. New York: Behavioral Publications, 1968, pp. 75-99.
35.
KELLY, J. G.Content and process: An ecological view of the interdependence of practice and research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1986, 14, 581-589.
36.
KELLY, J. G., AZELTON, S., BURZETTE, R., & MOCK, L.Creating social settings for diversity: An ecological thesis. In T Trickett, D. Birman, and R. Watts (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994, pp. 424-451.
37.
KINGRY-WESTERGAARD, C., & KELLY, J. G.A contextualist epistemology for ecological research. In P H. Tolan, C. Keys, E Chertok, and L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: The integration of theories and methods. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1990, pp. 23-31.
38.
KOSSEK, E., & ZONIA, S.Assessing diversity climate: A field study of reactions to employer efforts to promote diversity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993, 1461-81.
39.
KOSSEK, E.ZONIA, S., & YOUNG, W.The limitations of organizational demography: Can diversity climate be enhanced in the absence of teamwork? In M. Ruderman, M. HughJames, and S. Jackson (Eds.), Selected research on work team diversity. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association & Center for Creative Leadership, 1996.
40.
LEVINE, M., & PERKINS, D.Community psychology: Perspectives and applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
MARABLE, M.Beyond black and white: Transforming African American politics. New York: Verso, 1995.
43.
MILLER, J. B.Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press, 1976.
44.
OGBU, J. U.Difference in cultural frame of reference. International Journal of Behavior Development, 1993, 16(3), 483-506.
45.
PYLE, J. L., & BOND, M. A.Emerging Dilemmas in Supporting Workforce Diversity. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Los Angeles, CA, August 1995.
46.
PYLE, J. L., & BOND, M. A.Workforce diversity: Emerging interdisciplinary challenges. New Solutions, 1997, 7(2), 41-57.
47.
RAPPAPORT, J.From Noah to Babel: Relationships between conceptions, values, analysis levels, and social intervention strategies. In I. Iscoe, B. Bloom, and C. Spielberger (Eds.), Community psychology in transition. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1977, pp. 175-184.
48.
RAPPAPORT, J.Empowerment as a guide to doing research: Diversity as a positive value. In E. Trickett, R. Watts, and D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994, pp. 359-382.
49.
RAPPAPORT, J.Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, and L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1990.
50.
RUDERMAN, M., HUGH-JAMES, M., & JACKSON, S.Selected research on work team diversity. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association & Center for Creative Leadership, 1996.
51.
SARASON, S. B.The creation of settings and the future societies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1972.
52.
TANNEN, D.You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books, 1990.
53.
TANNEN, D.Talking from 9 to 5. New York: William Morrow Press, 1994.
54.
TRICKETT, E.A future for community psychology: The contexts of diversity and the diversity of contexts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1996, 24(2), 209-234.
55.
TRICKETT, E., KELLY, J. G., & TODD, D.The social environment of the high school: Guidelines for organizational change and organizational development. In S. G. Golan and Eisdorfer (Eds.), Handbook of community mental health. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972, pp. 331-406.
56.
TRICKETT E., KELLY, J. G., & VINCENT, T.The spirit of ecological inquiry in community research. In E. Sussking and D. Klein (Eds.), Community research: Methods, paradigms, and applications. New York: Praeger, 1985, pp. 5-38.
57.
TRICKETT, E., WATTS, R. & BIRMAN, D.Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994. (a)
58.
TRICKEIT, E., WATTS, R. & BIRMAN, D.Toward an overarching framework for diversity. In Trickett, E.Watts, R. and Birman, D. (Eds.) Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994, pp. 7-26. (b)
59.
TSUI, A. S., EGAN, T. D., & O'REILLY III, C. A.Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37, 549-579.
60.
VINCENT, T., & TRICKETYT E.Preventive interventions and the human context: Ecological approaches to environmental assessment and change. In R. D. Felner, L. A. Jason, J. Moritsugu, and S. Farber (Eds.), Preventive Psychology: Theory, research and practice. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, pp. 67-86.
61.
WALSH, R.The evolution of the research relationship in community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1987, 15773-788.
62.
YIN, R.Case study research: Designs and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1984.
63.
YIN, R.Applications of case study research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1993.
