This study investigates the reactions of men from minority groups and White women who were selected through preferential treatment. The selection procedure allowed for group membership to be taken into account only after the qualifications of candidates were successfully established. Participants, 76 men from minority groups and 170 White women, worked as bus drivers or maintenance workers, which were the two job categories targeted by the affirmative action program in place. Contrary to previous studies, it was found that men and women did not differ in their reactions. Moreover, this study revealed that work related self-evaluations, work motivation, and satisfaction were contingent upon one's beliefs about affirmative action, and emotional reactions to discrimination against one's group. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.
DUBE, L. , & GUIMOND, S.Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue . In J. M. Olson , C. P. Herman , and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison. The Ontario symposium Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986, pp. 158-179 .
GRAVES, L. M. , & POWELL, G. N.Effects of sex-based preferential selection and discrimination on job attitudes . Human Relations, 1994, 47, 133-157 .
6.
GUIMOND, S. , & DUBE-SIMARD, L.Relative deprivation theory the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group, deprivation issue . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 526-535 .
7.
HEILMAN, E. E. , SIMON, M. C. , & REPPER, D. P.Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? The impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 62-68 .
8.
HEILMAN, M. E. , LUCAS, J. A. , & KAPLOW, S. R.Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990, 46, 202-216 .
9.
HEILMAN, M. E. , RIVERO, J. C. , & BRETT, J. F.Skirting the competence issue: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on task choices of women and men . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 99-105 .
10.
LENNEY, E.What's fine for the gander isn't always good for the goose: Sex differences in self-confidence as a function of ability area and comparison with others . Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 905-923 .
11.
LEONARD, J. S.Antidiscrimination or reverse discrimination: The impact of changing demographics. Title VII, and affirmative action or productivity . Journal of Human Resources, 1984, 19, 145-174 .
12.
LIND, E. A. , & TYLER, T. R.The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press , 1988.
13.
LIND, E. A. , KURTZ, S. , MUSANTE, L. , & THIBAUT, J. W.Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 643-653 .
14.
LOURY, G.Beyond civil rights. In J. D. William (Ed.), The state of Black America-1986New York: National Urban League , 1986, pp. 163-174.
15.
LOVRICH, N. P. , STEEL, B. S. , & HOOD . Equity versus productivity: Affirmative action and municipal police services . Public Productivity Review, 1986, 39, 61-72 .
16.
MACCOBY, E. E. , & JACKLIN, C. N.The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 1974.
17.
McMAHON, I. D.Expectancy of success on sex-linked tasks . Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 949-958 .
18.
NACOSTE, R. W.But do they care about fairness? The dynamics of preferential treatment and minority influence . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1987, 8, 77-191 .
19.
NACOSTE, R. W.Affirmative action and self-evaluation. In F. A. Blanchard and F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag , 1989, pp. 103-109.
20.
NACOSTE, R. W.Toward a psychological ecology of affirmative action . Social Justice Research, 1992, 5, 269-289 .
21.
NACOSTE, R. W. , & LEHMAN, D.Procedural stigma . Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1987, 17, 25-38 .
22.
ROBERTS, L. W.Understanding affirmative action. In W. E. Block and M. A. Walker (Eds.), Discrimination, affirmative action and equal opportunity. Vancouver, B.C.: The Fraser Institute , 1981, pp. 147-182.
23.
STEEL, B. S. , & LOVRICH, JR., N. P.Equality and efficiency tradeoffs on affirmative action-Real or imagined? The case of women in policing . The Social Science Journal, 1987, 24, 53-70 .
24.
TOUGAS, F. , & VEILLEUX, F.The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1988, 20, 16-29 .
25.
TOUGAS, F. , & VEILLEUX, F.Male acceptance of affirmative action programs for women: The result of altruistic or egotistical motives?International Journal of Psychology, 1989, 24, 485-496 .
26.
TOUGAS, F. , DUBE, L. , & VEILLEUX, F.Privation relative et programmes d'action positive . Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 1987, 19, 167-177 .
27.
TOUGAS, F., VEILLEUX, F., CERE, M., & BOUDREAULT, L L'effet de l'information sur la privation relative collective dans une situation d'évaluation de candidat-e-s. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 1989, 10(3), 1-12.
28.
TOUGAS, F. , CROSBY, F. , JOLY, S. , & PELCHAT, D.Men's attitudes toward affirmative action: Justice and intergroup relations at the cross-roads . Social Justice Research, 1995, 8, 57-71 .
29.
TOUGAS, F. , BROWN, R. , BEATON, A. M. , & JOLY, S.Neo-sexism: Plus ça change plus c'est pareil . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. (In press).
30.
TURNER, M. E. , PRATKANIS , & HARDAWAY, T.Sex differences in reactions to preferential selection: Towards a model of preferential selection as help . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1991, 6, 797-814 .
31.
U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics . Research summaries: Occupational segregation by race and sex, 1940-88 . Monthly Labor Review, 1992, 115, 30-38 . (a)
32.
U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics . Trends in wage and salary inequality, 1967-88 . Monthly Labor Review, 1992, 115, 23-39 . (b)
