The effects of managerial and professional employees' (N = 188) perceptions of sex-based preferential selection and discrimination on their job attitudes were examined. As expected, men and women had negative job attitudes when they believed that selection practices discriminated against their own sex. Contrary to previous findings, however, both men and women had more positive job attitudes when their own sex was given preferential treatment than when decisions were sex-neutral. Overall, there was no support for the notion that preferential treatment has a negative effect on the job attitudes of its intended beneficiaries.
ADAMS, J. S.Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965, pp. 267-299.
2.
BLUEDORN, A. C.A unified model of turnover from organizations. Human Relations, 1982, 35, 135-153.
3.
CAMMANN, C., FICHMAN, M., JENKINS, G. D., Jr., & KLESH, J. R.Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler III, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1983, pp. 71-138.
4.
CHACKO, T. I.Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 119-123.
5.
COCKBURN, C.In the way of women: Men's resistance to sex equality in organizations. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1991.
6.
COSIER, R. A., & DALTON, D. R.Equity theory and time: A reformulation. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 311-319.
7.
CROSBY, F.Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
8.
CROSBY, F., & CLAYTON, S.Affirmative action and the issue of expectancies. Journal of Social Issues, 1990, 46(2), 61-79.
9.
FARKAS, A. J., & TETRICK, L. E.A three-wave longitudinal analysis of the causal ordering of satisfaction and commitment on turnover decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 855-868.
10.
GREENBERG, J.Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg and R. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1982, pp 389-435.
11.
GREENBERG, J.Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 71, 606-613.
12.
HEILMAN, M. E., LUCAS, J. A., & KAPLOW, S. R.Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990, 46, 202-216.
13.
HEILMAN, M. E., RIVERO, J. C., & BRETT, J. F.Skirting the competence issue: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on task choices of women and men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 99-105.
14.
HEILMAN, M. E., SIMON, M. C., & REPPER, D. P.Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 62-68.
15.
JACCARD, J., TURRISI, R., & WAN, C. K.Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
16.
JASSO, G.A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45, 3-32.
17.
JONES, R. A.Self-fulfilling prophecies: Social, psychological, and physiological effects of expectancies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
18.
KLEIMAN, L. S., & FALEY, R. H.Voluntary affirmative action and preferential treatment: Legal and research implications. Personnel Psychology, 1988, 41, 481-496.
19.
KRAUT, A. I.Predicting turnover of employees from measured job attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 233-243.
20.
LECK, J. D., & SAUNDERS, D. M.Canada's Employment Equity Act: Effects on employee selection. Population Research and Policy Review, 1992, 11, 21-49.
21.
LOCKE, E. A.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1976, pp. 1297-1349.
22.
MAJOR, B. Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver and C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987, pp. 124-148.
23.
MAJOR, B., & DEAUX, K.Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg and R. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1982, pp. 43-76.
24.
MATHIEU, J. E., & ZAJAC, D. M.A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 108, 171-194.
25.
MOWDAY, R. T., PORTER, L. W., & STEERS, R. M.Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
26.
NACOSTE, R. W.Affirmative action and self-evaluation. In F. Blanchard and F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 103-109.
27.
NIEVA, V. F., & GUTEK, B. A.Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 267-276.
28.
NOE, R. A.Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13, 65-78.
29.
NORTHCRAFT, G. B., & MARTIN, J.Double jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries. In B. A. Gutek (Ed.), Sex role stereotyping and affirmative action policy. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute of Industrial Relations, 1982, pp. 81-130.
30.
O'REILLY, C. A., III, CHATMAN, J., & CALDWELL, D. F.People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 487-516.
31.
PEDHAZUR, E.Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1982.
32.
RESKIN, B. F., & HARTMANN, H. I.Women's work, men's work: Sex segregation on the job. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
33.
ROCHE, G. R.Much ado about mentors. Harvard Business Review, 1979, 79(1), 14-28.
34.
ROSEN, B., & JERDEE, T. H.Coping with affirmative action backlash. Business Horizons, 1979, 22(8),15-20.
35.
SEDMAK, N. J., & LEVIN-EPSTEIN, M. D.Primer on equal employment opportunity (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 1991.
36.
SPECTOR, P. E.Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 438-443.
37.
STONE, E. F.Moderator variables in research: A review and analysis of conceptual and methodological issues. In K. Rowland and G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988, pp. 191-229.
38.
TOUGAS, F., & VEILLEUX, F.Who likes affirmative action?: Attitudinal processes among men and women. In F. Blanchard and F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp. 111-124.
39.
WALSTER, E., BERSCHEID, E., & WALSTER, G. W.New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 151-176.
40.
WHITE, M. C., DE SANCTIS, G., & CRINO, M. D.Achievement, self-confidence, personality traits, and leadership ability: A review of the literature on sex-differences. Psychological Reports, 1981, 48, 547-569.
